LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Can high Epstein-Barr titers ever cause positive IGenex bands?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Can high Epstein-Barr titers ever cause positive IGenex bands?
Pika
Member
Member # 38414

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pika     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I wrote a negative review of the doctor who had ignored my positive Lyme test and misdiagnosed me with fibro/CFS only. Someone responded with this:

"I (the respondent) had a positive IgeneX test, but the bands I had can be positive because of high Epstein-Barr titers."

She didn't specify WHICH bands she had on IGeneX, of course.

I was IGeneX and Labcorp positive for 39, which is Lyme specific, and 41, so I am not wondering about my own results. However, are there really any bands that can be made positive by the Epstein-Barr virus, or was this person just trying to discredit IGeneX?

--------------------
Went through five years of hell because an IDSA doc ignored a CDC-positive Western blot in 2009. Started Lyme treatment in early 2014. Trying to wrap my foggy brain around the intricacies of this disease. I also have Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

Posts: 30 | From NY | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
-
Q: "Can high Epstein-Barr titers ever cause positive IGenex bands?"

No. No. No. No.

The bands are noting reaction to a spirochete . . . not a virus, not any other bacteria.

Only one band (maybe two) might cross reference with another spirochetal infection.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
susank
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 22150

Icon 1 posted      Profile for susank     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think 30 and 31 can - hence the epitope tests for them. Not sure about other bands and crossreactions. Would like to know my self - viruses and bacterial.

--------------------
Pos.Bb culture 2012
Labcorp - no bands ever
Igenex - Neg. 4 times
With overall bands:
IGM 18,28,41,66 IND: 23-25,34,39
IGG 41,58 IND: 39
Bart H IGG 40

Posts: 1613 | From Texas | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Judie
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 38323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Judie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'd call Igenex. They might be able to tell you if no one here knows.

39 is a bacterial membrane protein specific for Bb
41 is specific for a flagella

I think your doctor who said it wasn't Lyme is an idiot and the person who responded to you is a doubter. Neither person is helpful.

Since you're CDC positive though, I'd put my money on the virus bands being an excuse to tell people it's a false positive or (more likely) the person can be infected with both Lyme and Epstein-Barre.

These threads might be helpful:

http://forums.phoenixrising.me/index.php?threads/igenex-lyme-tbd-testing-different-interpretations.18649/

"Igenex offers a test that can separate out whether or not this is a cross reaction or not. It is called the 31 kda epitope test."

http://www.roadback.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=10664

Posts: 2839 | From California | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If you really want to know, call Igenex as Judie suggested.

but your test is clearly from Lyme

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pika
Member
Member # 38414

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pika     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No, I know my test was Lyme; I was just wondering if that person was right about any of the non-borrelia-specific bands.

I will check the links Judie provided (Judie, you are a Link Goddess) and call IGeneX.

Thanks, Lymies!

--------------------
Went through five years of hell because an IDSA doc ignored a CDC-positive Western blot in 2009. Started Lyme treatment in early 2014. Trying to wrap my foggy brain around the intricacies of this disease. I also have Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

Posts: 30 | From NY | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LilaLee*
Member
Member # 43649

Icon 1 posted      Profile for LilaLee*     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is really interesting to me as that i have issues with these same questions. I had previously posted that i have a +anti-ccp, an antibody very specific to RA, and was dumped in the RA lane (with massive immune suppressant drugs) for 3 years.

In the midst of that i had a Labcorp Lyme test that was +39 but ignored due to "cross-reactivity" with RA. Eventually i got to a LLMD and had an Igenex test which was +39, +41, IND 83-93. Btw, is this considered CDC+ and reported?...

Additionally, i have high EPV, Mycoplasma, CMV as well as low CD47. The Rheumy insists that 1) "the lab isn't totally reliable (what lab is? hence the need for clinical diagnosis, right?) 2) "these bands can be cross reactive."

I emailed Igenex about this issue and didn't get a response. This seems to be one of those questions where there are conflicting opinions.

For me, the +CCP remains a big question as to if the Lyme infection has created the antibody (this is what my LLMD...that it will go down with treatment) or, that i possibly have both RA and Lyme (but fact is i failed 5 different major RA meds).

I am going to post a new discussion re +CCP but anyone who has experience with this i would love to hear from. THis is pretty much unchartered territory as far as i can tell.

Back to the EBV, i have the same questions as you and have been unable to get a consensus.

--------------------
LL

Posts: 79 | From Rocky Mountains | Registered: Apr 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Judie
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 38323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Judie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
LilaLee - Yes, you're CDC positive. Get a copy of the tests if you don't have them already.

One band is suspicious. It's like saying you're a little pregnant. You have Lyme-specific bands on 2 tests.

Igenex is a good lab. Your rheumy is wrong.

More info:
http://www.anapsid.org/lyme/wb.html

I also got in an argument with a doc about testing. This doc had diagnosed my EM rash as a spider bite. I had been seeing this doc for 10 years and trusted her.

I got a second opinion and a Labcorp test. CDC positive on that one.

I talked to my old doc about it and she immediately snapped at me and asked if it was "that lab where everyone tests positive."

I said it wasn't and she didn't have much to say after that. There's so much denial about Lyme.

This whole "it might be Epstein Barr" just sounds like more confusion being thrown out there.

I've had 3 tests from Igenex after being reinfected. I am CDC negative on those, so it all depends on how the tests are interpreted.

I even have 4 pluses on a band and am still considered negative even with 2 known ticks bites and several bands that aren't counted by the CDC because they were part of the lymerix vaccine (which I never had, they are Lyme specific).

These test were NEVER meant for complete diagnosis.

Lyme messes up the immune system and sets you up to collect infections. I have 15 coinfections.

Here's more info on testing:

http://flash.lymenet.org/scripts/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=127210;p=0#000000

Posts: 2839 | From California | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LilaLee*
Member
Member # 43649

Icon 1 posted      Profile for LilaLee*     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks Judie. I appreciate this info.

btw, i also have Hypercoagulation but the test i was given that established that was Prothrombin Time. Is this part of the 'Fibrin Monomer' (sp) test you refer to?

Also, re CDC+, what i meant was am i a reported case? Does IGENEX report?? Or does the DR report....

--------------------
LL

Posts: 79 | From Rocky Mountains | Registered: Apr 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Judie
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 38323

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Judie     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't know who reports to the CDC.

I've had two tests for hypercoagulation. Both were drawn from Labcorp.

One said my fibrin monomer was abnormal. That's all it said, no other details.

I then treated with boluoke for several months.

Labcorp then did a blood draw for an ISAC test (Labcorp is suppose to do these for free without issue, but the tech wasn't informed and that was a whole other ordeal). Esoterix is the lab it's sent to for analysis.

The ISAC test showed my fibrin activity was now in normal range, however on the high side. This had way more detail than just the fibrin monomer test.

Posts: 2839 | From California | Registered: Jul 2012  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LilaLee*
Member
Member # 43649

Icon 1 posted      Profile for LilaLee*     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
great info, thanks:)

--------------------
LL

Posts: 79 | From Rocky Mountains | Registered: Apr 2014  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Robin123
Moderator
Member # 9197

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Robin123     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We can also contact IGeneX by calling them at 1-800-832-3200 -

No, IGeneX doesn't report cases - that's done, or not done, by doctors to counties, who report to the state, who reports to the CDC - it's a long chain which can get broken at any link, unfortunately.

Posts: 13171 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Keebler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
-
Adding to Robin's note about reporting cases to the CDC. That's usually done by the diagnosing doctor to the county / state health department and they report it to the CDC.

In Oregon, the various health departments have sometimes called naturopathic doctors who report a case of lyme and try to talk them OUT of it. I know this first hand. Actually "try to talked them out of it" is putting it quite mildly. In the end, the report was just not accepted.

When I had a CDC positive Igenex, my MD at the time would not even accept it. Tossed it into the trash can right there in the office visit (along with Dr. B's guidelines I had taken to discuss with her). I asked if she would at least report the case and her face just about blew off her head. I got the official state motto tossed back at me.

By the time someone actually has a CDC defined positive, that seems like enough hurdles to have to jump over. But, in Oregon, the official motto is "no lyme here" and they intend to stay under that cover.

Every now and then, though, a case or two do seem to trickle in to one or the other of the report graphs comparing state lyme cases, somehow, though so many are not counted, or treated. Those charts are just a joke. I think the realtors and tourism folks are in on the joke, too.
-

Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.