I'm curious about how effective it is at crossing the blood brain barrier with a 800 mg/d dose.
Any info would be greatly appreciated. I've been searching for this info for a while with little success. There doesn't appear to be much data out there.
posted
I am taking Ketek and would like to know this also. Thanks for the post.
Posts: 560 | From PA | Registered: Apr 2001
| IP: Logged |
lla2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 2364
posted
I don't think there is any info yet because it's a fairly new abx, and the FDA has only approved it for use for a 10 day period...not for how we are taking it...
so no one knows yet how it affects the tissues long term, especially if taken for longer than the 10 period they tested it on....
we'll just have to wait and see. It also has not been approved for use on children yet, because their receptors for this particular medication is not fully developed yet, but as i understand some kids are doing great on it..so go figure...
Lisa
Posts: 4713 | From saunderstown, ri Usa | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
posted
My daughter-the-nurse forbade me to take Ketek after reading the fine print. She said it poses a strong risk for heart attacks and vascular problems. And I had such high hopes! love dharma
Posts: 731 | From NH | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
lla2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 2364
posted
this is one of the reasons the fda has not recommedned it for longer than a 10 day period..they do not have the research to back it up for longer than that, adn that is why these sheets say things like this....
I'm a nurse, and I did not take ketek because of what my pharmacist told me about it not being proven to be safe for longer than 10 days...I know we take chances every day, but the abx we stay on usually have longer track records ..this one is new...I didn't want to be a guinea pig...
but I hear it's doing goodthings for people..so I'm keeping my fingers crossed...it just won't be me trying it ....
Lisa
Posts: 4713 | From saunderstown, ri Usa | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
Mathias
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5298
posted
I guess we are in uncharted territory. I've already been on it for 8 weeks. No adverse side effects what so ever. Posts: 1250 | From New Jersey | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
liz28
Unregistered
posted
I've been on it four weeks, and its effects are far-reaching and not easily given up. This might be my cure.
IP: Logged |
posted
There is so little out there on the ketolides. Here's a clip from one study:
The Ketolides: a critical review, Dec 2002 Ketolides such as telithromycin display excellent pharmacokinetics allowing once daily dose administration and extensive tissue distribution relative to serum. Evidence suggests the ketolides are primarily metabolised in the liver and that elimination is by a combination of biliary, hepatic and urinary excretion.
Pharmacodynamically, ketolides display an element of concentration dependent killing unlike macrolides which are considered time dependent killers.
This article offers the best ketolide tissue-concentration info vis-a-vis borelliosis I could find:
Based upon our findings, however, the ketolides were superior in vitro on a micrograms-per-milliliter basis when tested alongside classical macrolides under identical test conditions in BSK. This is further substantiated by our time-kill experiments (Fig. 1A to C) and by electron microscopy.
Moreover, maximum concentrations of ketolides in plasma after regular oral dosage (1, 6, 27) are 90 to 270 times higher than the MIC90s against borreliae in our study, and tissue concentrations exceed by 10-fold the maximum plasma concentrations of both drugs in controls (1, 6, 27). Therefore, the potential role of ketolides in the treatment of LD merits further evaluation.
The regular oral dosage referred to in that study is 800mg/d, so it looks like you're right on target, Mathias. (For what that's worth. )
Please holler if you find more info on this; I'm considering switching from my cephalosporin to a ketolide like Ketek.
peanut
Posts: 67 | From Dutchess Co., NY | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
lla2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 2364
posted
I don't think anyone is arguing the effeciveness of hte ketolide, but rather the LENGTH of time people are staying on it...the fda has only approved of it's use for a 10 day period at 800mg...not the 30 or more days that lymies are using it for...
that was the concern..not it's effectiveness..
Lisa
Posts: 4713 | From saunderstown, ri Usa | Registered: Apr 2002
| IP: Logged |
Mathias
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5298
posted
Effectiveness is my concern.
I want to know if I have any bactericidal activity with Ketek in my CNS. From what I've read you need concentrations (MBC) of 2ug/ml or greater.
Where did you find the 2ug/ml figure? The table of findings in the study I linked above rates the ketolides as the most potent borrelicide on a ug/ml basis - from 0.06ug/ml to 0.2ug/ml to kill 90% of the isolates.
Is that just blood concentration (and in vitro), and not necessarily reflective of tissue penetration? (I'd love to learn more, just starting to research this stuff).
peanut
[This message has been edited by circuspeanut (edited 11 October 2004).]
Posts: 67 | From Dutchess Co., NY | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
liz28
Unregistered
posted
So you're saying it actually takes a much smaller amount than we thought, and the high doses are meant to increase tissue penetration?
If that's the case, do we ever run out of bugs to kill, or do we have to keep flushing them out with exercise, stress, beer, etc.?
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/