I read a review on the Rife web site about the F Scan. They labeled it the F Scam because after taking it apart, they concluded that there is no way for this machine to do what it claims. It is also way overpriced. This is what was written.Those who are actually using the F-Scan to help others are seeing remarkable things happen. It is necessary to use it correctly, however, and it is not difficult. And sometimes the needed MOR will be above 2,000,000 Hz.
One afternoon a lady came in for a consultation. Her MD had told here that she had a high sedimentation rate (sticky blood). I jokingly suggested that he should have fixed it for her! Sticky blood can be caused by dehydration and other things including pathogens. A look at the blood confirmed that it was very sticky with a lot of fibrin suggesting excess clotting factors and excess risk for heart disease and strokes. Hydration was adequate and the F-Scan found high peaks at 62,000 and 63,000. A 2.5 minute application of each of these frequencies result in an almost ideal looking sample. Later that afternoon I had a second client with the same problem and result. Sometimes there are also peaks in the 73,000-74,000 area that are related to sticky blood. Do most people get hits at 62,000-63,000? The majority of my clients (who all have health problems) do. The people who do not have sticky blood do not.
Richard Loyd, Ph.D.
I did dozens of tests on the F-scan, I took it apart and traced its circuitry. It doesn't have any capability to measure what it claims to. I took a plain ordinary resistor and tested it on a commercial frequency impedance analyser accurate to 1 part in 100 million and found it had a perfectly flat response in the range 80Khz to 100Khz. I then put it on the F-scan which gave me peaks at 81-82,000. Do you seriously expect me to believe that somehow my resistor miraculously ingested some colloidal silver somewhere between removing it from the analyser and connecting it to the F-scan?
I'm sorry, I'm not out to shatter anyone's illusions, but the fact is that the F-scan does not, and cannot measure MOR's, metals or anything else. If you want to kid yourself that it does, fine. Personally I don't care either way. What I DO care about is that sick people are being parted from a LOT of money for a device that makes false and misleading claims. And it's only for the sake of those people I feel obliged to tell the truth. If anyone wants a device that can do what the F-scan does then I would advise them to buy a simple signal generator, they can get one for less than 1/40th of what the F-scan costs.
Aubrey Scoon. Read Aubrey Scoon's test report, here!