LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » first confirmed report of transplacental Babesia infection

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: first confirmed report of transplacental Babesia infection
riversinger
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4851

Icon 1 posted      Profile for riversinger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"This is the first confirmed report of transplacental Babesia infection in any animal species."

Abstract

* *Int J Parasitol. 2005 Jun 23; [Epub ahead of print]
*Fatal experimental transplacental Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs.*

Fukumoto S, Suzuki H, Igarashi I, Xuan X.

Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan.

A Babesia gibsoni infected ***** was mated with an uninfected dog in order to determine whether this parasite could be vertically transmitted. The ***** delivered a litter of four live and one stillborn pup. The four pups died from congenital babesiosis between 14 and 39 days post-birth. Babesia gibsoni DNA was detected in tissue from all five pups. These results show that vertical transmission occurred by the uterine route and not via the transmammary route. This is the first confirmed report of transplacental Babesia infection in any animal species.

PMID: 15979628 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

------------------
Sonoma County Lyme Support
[email protected]


Posts: 2142 | From California | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Melanie Reber
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 3707

Icon 10 posted      Profile for Melanie Reber   Author's Homepage         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks Riversinger,

I am so pleased that at last something is in writing that can be pointed to for vertical transmission.

Melanie


Posts: 7052 | From Colorado | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
riversinger
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4851

Icon 1 posted      Profile for riversinger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Melanie!

Yes,

I think it's critical that this info get out. Of course, it doesn't give us any feedback on what happens with treatment, but this is a pretty sobering rate of transmission in this study.

When you think how many people with Lyme may have seronegative Babesia as well, it makes you think pretty hard.

------------------
Sonoma County Lyme Support
[email protected]


Posts: 2142 | From California | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pippy
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6005

Icon 9 posted      Profile for pippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
sobering yet very sad they used dogs.

Why can't they use mice or something else?

this is important, co-infections are so important to understand...
thanks for the info River!

[This message has been edited by pippy (edited 21 July 2005).]


Posts: 446 | From California | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mo
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2863

Icon 3 posted      Profile for Mo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow -

Has anyone sent a copy to Doctor Jones?

I mean - he knows this already..but it would be of interest, I bet.

Mo


Posts: 8337 | From the other shore | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ICEiam
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7519

Icon 9 posted      Profile for ICEiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My Daughter has Lyme plus 4 coinfections, little 3 year old has Lyme are waiting for coinfection test results.........We already suspect she has coinfections. This is a child that has NEVER been bit by a tick, she was born with Lyme. We have seen LLMD in CA. but he referred us on to Dr. J and he will do follow up and work with Dr. J on her case since CA. is much closer for us than CT.

------------------
ICEY

IDAHO LYME SUPPORT GROUP
[email protected]


Posts: 468 | From Las Vegas NV | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
riversinger
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4851

Icon 1 posted      Profile for riversinger   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pippy, I know it is bad that the animals have to suffer. Though I'm not sure it is better for mice to suffer than dogs. I think they choose the animal that is closest to us in terms of how the body functions, so maybe dogs are like us in childbearing?

Mo, I don't know if Dr. Jones has seen this. I got it from a list some of the doctors are on. If anybody knows how to get it to him, that would be very good. At least if the animals had to suffer, there will be some benefit from it.

I think everybody should be sure to give it to their doctors!!!

------------------
Sonoma County Lyme Support
[email protected]

[This message has been edited by riversinger (edited 05 July 2005).]


Posts: 2142 | From California | Registered: Nov 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Biting Back
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6018

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Biting Back     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you for posting this!
Posts: 703 | From Almost Heaven | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.