LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » WB results

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: WB results
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IGG
18 -
23 -
28 -
30 +
39 -
41 -
45 -
58 -
66 +
93 -

IGM
23 -
39 -
41 -

These are Quest reults. Can anyone give me any information on this. I just had bloodwork done that went to Igenex.

[This message has been edited by coach (edited 31 August 2005).]

[ 07. September 2005, 08:58 AM: Message edited by: coach ]

Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jloisu
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7538

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jloisu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As far as test results go, wait for the IgeneX results, the Quest results aren't worth your time (or your blood for that matter). I tested negative multiple times w/Quest. If you want to analyze what you have, I believe that the 30 kDa band is specific for lyme, but I'm not the best person to ask...Lymetoo, are you out there?

As far as the rest goes, if you think you have Lyme, hopefully the Dr. that is testing you is a LLMD. If not, post on here and someone will help you find one, but I would get that ball rolling as the IgeneX results take 2-3 weeks.

Best wishes,

jloisu

[This message has been edited by jloisu (edited 31 August 2005).]

[This message has been edited by jloisu (edited 31 August 2005).]


Posts: 197 | From Seeing Lyme Green in Iowa | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 6 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi coach....yep, Quest is pathetic for lyme testing.

According to the following link, band 30 is "possibly a variant of outer surface protein A." [not Lyme-specific]

Band 60...?? never heard of it

This is a very informative link on interpreting the Western Blot. Read it now, but read it again when your "real test" comes back!!

Western Blot explanation: http://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/022767.html

------------------
Do not take anything I say as medical advice. I am not a doctor, but I DID stay at a Holiday Inn Express!
oops!
Lymetutu


Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
groovy2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6304

Icon 1 posted      Profile for groovy2   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Coach

I just got my test results back
from Igenix today--
Results were indeterminet--

I definatilly have lyme--
I had perfect Lyme bruse on
back of my leg 20 years ago--
I have been sick ever sence--
I have or have had almost every
symptom --
I think I may also have Babs--
test came back indeterminate also--

If the test could not find Lyme
in my blood--It sucks perty bad--

I have a friend who used to preform
these tests--Very compulcated--
many steps--I can see why they
dont work---


Do not use test to rule out lyme
--only to conferm--Jay--


Posts: 2999 | From Austin tx USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 6 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jay, which bands were positive? That's the important thing.

------------------
Do not take anything I say as medical advice. I am not a doctor, but I DID stay at a Holiday Inn Express!
oops!
Lymetutu


Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jloisu
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7538

Icon 3 posted      Profile for jloisu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jay,

Don't throw out the IGeneX test quite yet. It is the best lab we have for doing the Western Blot. I came back indeterminate too, but this is based on the CDC screening standards set up a long time ago to track epidemiology and not for diagnostic purposes.

As Lymetoo says, the bands that are positive and or indeterminate make a big difference.

But yes, there are many reasons why the WB can be inaccurate....too many to even list, from timing of the test, to test procedures, to antibody levels, to lyme changing forms like the cyst form, to antibody-antigen complexes formed when the antibody finds the lyme and binds to it like a lock and key. Then the test looking for the antibody doesn't see many if any of them because of all of the antigens (lyme) floating around binding to the antibodies...many other reasons....

BUT the point is LYME IS A CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS. The testing is merely a piece of the puzzle to support the diagnosis made by a qualified LLMD.

Best wishes,

jloisu


Posts: 197 | From Seeing Lyme Green in Iowa | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
30 + = According to CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 1995;
44 (31):590-591, an IgM immunoblot is considered positive if two of the
following three bands are present:

24 kDa (OspC)*
39 kDa (BmpA)
41 kDa (Fla)

An IgG immunoblot is considered positive if five of the following 10
bands are present:

18 kDa
21 kDa (OspC)*
28 kDa
30 kDa
39 kDa (BmpA)
41 kDa (Fla)
45 kDa
58 kDa (not GroEL)
66 kDa
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::

66 + kDa = *66-kDa P66 Oms66 Hsp outer/integral membrane protein
P66, P60, P41 which are dominant immunogens of (all) types of borrelias
PMID: 9162453 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?uid=9162453&form=6&db=m&Dopt=b

I wouldn't put a lot of weight on quests WB http://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/026659.html


Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisianthus
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6631

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lisianthus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Where are all the rest of the bands on the IGM? Quest is nortorious for NOT testing for all the bands.

I would not trust any Lyme test from Quest. Post your results from Igenex when you receive them.

Lisi


Posts: 986 | From Michigan | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
that is all they tested. I will post the Igenex results when I get them.
Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BJG
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 4723

Icon 1 posted      Profile for BJG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi
A site that I found was helpful is from Dr Charles Ray Jones.


HE states that there are 9 known Bb genuus specie specific.

He staes that if you have ONE of these bands pos you have Bb-Lyme.

they are 18, 23, 30, 34, 37, 39, 83, 93


Good Luck
Peace,
B


Posts: 468 | From IL | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bg
Junior Member
Member # 46416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bg     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Call your blood lab asking them to CALL IGENEX and request they FAX your results as well as MAIL the results to you.

Mine were lost for 5 wks!

bettyg, Iowa


Posts: 1 | From US | Registered: Aug 2015  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 6 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

REASONS WHY A SERONEGATIVE TEST RESULT MIGHT OCCUR

1. Recent infection before immune response
2. Antibodies are in immune complexes
3. Spirochete encapsulated by host tissue (i.e. lymphocytic cell walls)
4. Spirochetes are deep in host tissue
5. Only blebs in body fluid; no whole organisms needed for PCR
6. No spirochetes in body fluid on day of test
7. Genetic heterogeneity (300 strains in U.S.)
8. Antigenic variability
9. Surface antigens change with temperature
10.Utilization of host protease instead of microbial protease
11.Spirochete in dormancy phase
12.Recent antibiotic treatment
13.Recent anti-inflammatory treatment
14.Concomitant infection with babesia may cause immunosuppression
15.Other causes of immunosuppression
16.Lab with poor technical capability for Lyme disease
17.Lab tests not standardized for late stage disease
18.Lab tests labeled "for investigational use only"
19.CDC criteria is epidemiological, not a diagnostic criteria

FDA bulletin on testing: http://www.fda.gov/medbull/summer99/Lyme.html

------------------
Do not take anything I say as medical advice. I am not a doctor, but I DID stay at a Holiday Inn Express!
oops!
Lymetutu


Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
BJG, do have the site for Dr. Charles Ray Smith?
Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BugBit
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7829

Icon 6 posted      Profile for BugBit     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just got mone back from Igenex: I have been ill over 30 years, probably bitten in childhood. I am 49.

IgM Results:

18kDa IND
22kDa -
23-25kDa +
28kDa ++
30kDa +
31kDa +
34kDa IND
37kDa -
39kDa +
41kDa +
45kda IND
58kDa IND
66kDa +
73kDa -
83kDa -
93kDa +

This is marked POSITIVE and the explanation of that is that my results meet both CDC and Igenex criteria.
I shudder to think what the results might have been if my blood sample hadn't sat in the postoffice all weekend. My Duc's office didn't send it overnight. :-0
*Bit*


Posts: 116 | From Bisbee, AZ USA | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
BugBit, what type of symptoms are/were you having?
Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
groovy2
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6304

Icon 1 posted      Profile for groovy2   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi all

the WB test has to be preformed perfectily
to even get slightly reliable results-
The test has many complucated steps

And even if test is preformed perfectly
all the things Lymetoo listed
come into play also.

My friend is writing a paper that
explanes how the test is preformed--
and I will post it .
I think you will be surprised how
it is done --
I will give you a short discription-
the termonaligy is not correct

Blood is seperated into differnt parts
one part is used for test-
A slide is made up with a thin film
of a substance (subtrate)
that is devided into sections(bands)

In each section(band) a substance
that attracts certian things is placed-
Each section is different-

Then the part of your blood that was
seperated is placed on the bottom
of the slide -

The slide is then tilted so that
the things that are in the blood
that test is looking for has to
climb up the slide against gravity
to each section--

To make the blood climb up the
slide a eletric current is applied-

Then after a certian amount of time
the slide are examened-dye is
applyed to help see results on some
tests--

The slide is examened by a med tech
who inturpts results--

The tech has to inturped results
because the test dose not give
yes-no results--

The test dose not look for the germs-
it looks for your bodies responce to
the germs--

The amount of the stuff the med tech
sees in each section(band)
is what determins the test results-

The tech may not see anything in band
and this would be( -- )
If tech sees alittle of the stuff
it will be marked ( - )
If tech sees a little more
it will be marked ( + )
Tech sees a even more
it will be marked ( ++ )
and so on-

The tec may only look at
certian bands

Keep in mind that the slide is being
examened under a fairily high power
microscope-- not a easy task

The procedure each lab uses is
slightly differnt (Igenx-Quest ect)

And each lab also has its own critera
for what equals a ( ++ ) ect.

Also each med tech is also going
to inturpet tests differently --

The conditions in the lab have to
be perfect threw out test--
Tempature- humidity- light ect-
Im not sure but I think test takes
several days to preform.

The only way the test can be
preformed at price that we can
afford is threw doing test in
large numbers--so the med tech
dose not get to spend much time
on your test.

Also after you have been infected
for awhile the effectivness of
the test drops a bunch.

The WB test is also used to DX
anthrax--Remember the anthrax letters-
The government did not trust the test
eather and gave Everyone large doses
of ABX.

Aperantily the WB test can find some
deseases fairly accuratilly
but Lyme is not one of them--

I did find several good sites that
explained how WB test is preformed
in fairly plain english by googleing
wester blot--I will see if I can
find again and post--Jay--




Posts: 2999 | From Austin tx USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Coach:

Band 30 is OspA binding protein and is specific for Lyme.
Band 66 is also specific for Lyme (and they say "not 60" to differentiate it from a heat shock protein.

While you tested overall negative on the Quest test - most Lyme Dr.s treat if you have symptoms and ANY specific bands...

What is very unusual is that you did not show antibodies to band 41, which is a non specific band (cross reactive with other spirochete bacteria- even mouth bacteria) but is almost always present as positive.
You might have been just belwo the intensity cut - off level....

It'll be interesting to see your igenex results- they report the "inderterminant" bands- meaning you have antibodies - just not very many.

Barb


Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mathias
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5298

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mathias     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Was the IgM for band 41 positive or negative?

--------------------
Mathias

Posts: 1242 | From New Jersey | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
negative
Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 6 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is what Dr C has to say about band 66

66: Heat shock protein. This is the second most common borrelia

Western Blot explanation:
http://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/Forum1/HTML/022767.html

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96223 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lyme too:

As far as I know band 66 is *not* a heat shock protein - but rather an outer membrane protein of
borrelia. It's just not strain specific.
See reference 1 & 2

If you have more recent data showing 66 kDa isn't specific for borrelia, please post it.

Thanks,
Barb


Reference 1
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=8945554&query_hl=4

Surface exposure and species specificity of an immunoreactive domain of a 66-kilodalton outer membrane protein (P66) of the Borrelia spp. that cause Lyme disease.

Ref 2
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Sep 1;131(2):139-45.
Molecular analysis of a 66-kDa protein associated with the outer membrane of Lyme disease Borrelia.

Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mathias
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5298

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Mathias     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Some things on hsp 66 kDa:

------
Ensgraber, M., and M. Loos. 1992.

A 66-kilodalton heat shock protein of Salmonella typhimurium is responsible for binding of the bacterium to intestinal mucus. Infect. Immun. 60:3072-3078[Abstract].

----------------------

Cell Biochem. 1996 Oct;63(1):51-60. Related Articles, Links


Characterization of a new high-temperature-induced 66-kDa heat-shock protein, antigenically related to heat-shock protein 72.

Delpino A, Mileo AM, Lapenta V, Piselli P, Verdina A, Polenzani L.

Laboratory of Biophysics, Regina Elena Institute for Cancer Research, Rome, Italy.

M-14 human melanoma cells, following severe hyperthermic exposures, synthesized a heat-shock protein of 66 kDa (hsp 66), in addition to the major "classic" heat-shock proteins. This hsp 66 was not expressed following mild hyperthermic exposures sufficient to trigger the synthesis of the other heat-shock proteins. The induction of hsp 66 was observed also in Li human glioma cells treated at 45 degrees C for 20 min. By contrast, hsp 66 was not induced in seven other human cell lines (both melanoma and nonmelanoma) when they were subjected to the same hyperthermic treatment. Immunological recognition experiments showed that hsp 66 cross-reacted with the inducible hsp 72, but not with the constitutive hsp 73. The possibility that hsp 66 is a breakdown product of hsp 72 was ruled out by the fact that Poly(A)+ RNA extracted from cells treated at 45 degrees C for 20 min was able to direct the synthesis of hsp 66 (together with hsp 72) in a message-dependent rabbit reticulocyte lysate, as well as in microinjected Xenopus oocytes. By contrast, only the hsp 72 was expressed using Poly(A)+ RNA extracted from cells heated at 42 degrees C for 1 h. Affinity chromatography experiments on ATP-agarose showed that hsp 66 did not bind ATP in vitro. hsp 66 was localized both in the cytoplasm (cytosol, mitochondria, and microsome fraction) and in the nuclei of cells recovered from a severe heat shock: this intracellular distribution closely corresponded to that of hsp 72. The nuclear-associated hsp 66 was found to be tightly bound to nuclear structures and could not be extracted by incubation in ATP-containing buffer.

--------------------
Mathias

Posts: 1242 | From New Jersey | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am a little confused. Is band 66 a outer membrane protein of borrelia or not?

Coach

Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mathias:

None of molecular weight proteins on a Lyme western Blot are heat shock proteins to my knowledge.

Check out the authors on this 1996 paper.
This paper differentiates it from hsp66 you cite in the 1992 paper you noted.

If there was any way Gary Barbour could say a 9Lyme) protein was cross-reactive with a heat shock protein or close to the molecular weigh of one the body's own proteins (which would bolster their autoimmune or molecular mimicry theory) - beleive me he'd be screaming it from the roof-tops -

Barb


Infect Immun. 1996 Dec;64(12):5111-6.

Surface exposure and species specificity of an immunoreactive domain of a 66-kilodalton outer membrane protein (P66) of the Borrelia spp. that cause Lyme disease.

Bunikis J, Noppa L, Ostberg Y, Barbour AG, Bergstrom S.

Department of Microbiology, Umea University, Sweden.

A chromosomally encoded 66-kDa protein (P66) of Borrelia spp. that cause Lyme disease has previously been shown to be associated with the spirochetal outer membrane. A topological model of P66 predicts a surface-exposed fragment which links the N- and C-terminal intramembranous domains of the protein (J. Bunikis, L. Noppa, and S. Bergstrom, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 131:139-145, 1995).

In the present study, an immunogenic determinant of P66 was identified by a comparison of the immunoreactivities of different fragments of P66 generated either by proteolytic treatment of intact spirochetes

or as recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli.

The immune response to P66 during natural infection was found to be directed against the predicted surface domain which comprises amino acids at positions 454 through 491. A sequence comparison revealed considerable polymorphism of the surface domains of P66 proteins of different Lyme disease-causing Borrelia species. Five sequence patterns of this domain were observed in the B. garinii strains studied. In contrast, sequences of the relevant part of P66 of the B. afzelii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto isolates studied were identical within the respective species. In immunoblotting, 5 of 17 (29.4%) sera from North American patients with early disseminated or persistent Lyme disease reacted against P66 of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto B31. These sera, however, failed to recognize P66 of B. afzelii and B. garinii, as well as an analog of P66 in the relapsing fever agent, B. hermsii. In conclusion, the topological model of P66 is supported by the demonstration of an apparent surface localization of an immunoreactive domain of this protein. Furthermore, analogous to the plasmid-encoded borrelial outer surface proteins, the predicted surface-exposed portion of chromosomally encoded P66 appears to be antigenically heterogenous.

PMID: 8945554 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
coach
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7539

Icon 1 posted      Profile for coach     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IgeneX Western blot results

IgG
18 -
22 -
23-25 ++
28 ++
30 +
31 ++++
34 +
37 -
39 IND
41 +
45 -
58 ++
66 -
73 -
83 -
93 -

IgM
18 +
22 -
23-25 IND
30 +
31 -
34 IND
37 -
39 +
41 IND
45 -
58 +
66 IND
73 -
83 -
93 -

Posts: 146 | From New Jersey | Registered: Jun 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
David95928
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3521

Icon 1 posted      Profile for David95928     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Your results look pretty darned positive to this layman.
David

--------------------
Dave

Posts: 2034 | From CA | Registered: Jan 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
livinlyme
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3773

Icon 1 posted      Profile for livinlyme   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey Coach.
I think you will be surprised how different the Igenex results are from QUest... please post us as to the results when you get them..

I personally do not care for QUest.. and I would be interested in how they compare to Igenex.... the truth begins to unravel....
[Smile]

--------------------
"Hatred paralyzes life; love releases it. Hatred confuses life; love harmonizes it. Hatred darkens life; love illuminates it."

Posts: 1389 | From who knows, who cares, but somewhere over the rainbow | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
selbyl
Junior Member
Member # 6997

Icon 1 posted      Profile for selbyl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I work at Quest. They use Mardex for Lyme WB. It is good for early stage Lyme but not for chronic. I tested negative by Quest Mardex & positive by IGeneX, which I highly recommend. I've had conversations w/ Dr Harris at IGeneX & feel very comfortable w/ their testing accuracy, specificity, sensitivity & diagnostic criteria. Quest uses CDCs survellience criteria which was never intended to be used as diagnostic criteria like Quest uses it. I've emailed the medical director for some explanation as to why but haven't rec'd a response.

--------------------
Alz Daughter

Posts: 6 | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Positive results
IgG
23-25 ++ = Outer surface protein C (osp C). 25-kDa OspC [specific for Bb]
28 ++ = An outer surface protein. Oms28 [specific for Bb]
30 + = Possibly a variant of outer surface protein A. *30-kDa OspA substrate binding protein
31 ++++ = definitely Outer surface protein A (osp A). 31-kDa OspA [specific for Bb]
34 + = Outer surface protein B (osp B). OspB [specific for Bb]
41 + = Flagella or tail. This is how Borrelia burgdorferi moves around, by moving the flagella. Many bacteria in conjunction with these other bands yep
58 ++= Heat shock protein.yep
39 IND = saw something but not enough Unknown what this antigen is, but based on research at the National Institute of Health (NIH), other
Borrelia (such as Borrelia recurrentis that causes relapsing fever), do not even have the genetics to code
for the 39 kDa antigen, much less produce it. It is the most specific antibody for borreliosis of all. *39-kDa BmpA [specific for Bb]

IgM
18 + = An outer surface protein. *18-kDa p18 flagellin fragment
23-25 IND = saw something but not enough, Outer surface protein C (osp C).
30 + = Possibly a variant of outer surface protein A. *30-kDa OspA substrate binding protein yep
34 IND = saw something but not enough Outer surface protein B (osp B).
39 + = Unknown what this antigen is, but based on research at the National Institute of Health (NIH), other
Borrelia (such as Borrelia recurrentis that causes relapsing fever), do not even have the genetics to code
for the 39 kDa antigen, much less produce it. It is the most specific antibody for borreliosis of all.yep *39-kDa BmpA [specific for Bb]
41 IND = saw something but not enough Flagella or tail. This is how Borrelia burgdorferi moves around, by moving the flagella. Many bacteria
have flagella. This is the most common borreliosis antibody.
58 + = Heat shock protein.
66 IND = saw something but not enough Heat shock protein. This is the second most common borrelia antibody.

It is a clinical decision with all the positives and the bands you have and the symptoms too. I would say get treated and keep treating until all symptoms are gone. Then treat six months more after symptoms are gone this is what I would do and did treat six months more.

Depending how long you were infected if a couple weeks treat a couple months unless symptoms are there.
If sicker longer' treat longer'a lot longer. [Frown]

Rule of thumb
Bands specific for Borrelia burgdorferi:
14-kDa ?
21-kDa
22-kDa OspC
25-kDa OspC
28-kDa OspD
31-kDa OspA
34-kDa OspB
35-kDa
37-kDa
39-kDa
47-kDa
50-kDa
83-kDa
93-kDa
94-kDa


Cross-reacting bands:
19-kDa
22-kDa ??
20-kDa
30-kDa
33-kDa
34-kDa ??
36-kDa
40-kDa
41-kDa
60-kDa
66-kDa
72-kDa


--------------------
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Remember Iam not a Doctor Just someone struggling like you with Tick Borne Diseases.

Newbie Links

Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.