LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » I have to wonder why . . .

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: I have to wonder why . . .
elle
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7721

Icon 1 posted      Profile for elle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The CDC endorses ISDA treatment guidelines and states on their website that "Most cases of Lyme disease can be treated successfully with a few weeks of antibiotics. "

The guidelines put forth by the CDC as the guide that your doctor and mine should follow and adhere to has resulted in no treatment and undertreatment of a desease that has been problematic, painful, debilitating, expensive and deadly in several cases.

So I have to wonder why there are no class action law suit against the CDC? How can they recommend 2000 guidelines for physicians to treat lyme? Haven't they learned anything new since 2000?

I travel too far, spend too much money to see a doctor that ignores what the CDC has to say. Why? Because the CDC isn't being held responsible to do their JOB.

If they are going to stand by the inaccurate information that they put out and it causes harm (which it has) then they are responsible - which they are.

Why isn't anyone holding them responsible?

I unstand they are a giant but even giants are required to "DO NO HARM" in the medical profession -

elle

--------------------
When I feel blue . . . . . . its time to take another breath

Posts: 296 | From East Coast | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
elle
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7721

Icon 1 posted      Profile for elle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by elle:
The CDC endorses ISDA treatment guidelines and states on their website that "Most cases of Lyme disease can be treated successfully with a few weeks of antibiotics. "

The guidelines put forth by the CDC as the guide that your doctor and mine should follow and adhere to has resulted in no treatment and undertreatment of a desease that has been problematic, painful, debilitating, expensive and deadly in several cases.

So I have to wonder why there are no class action law suit against the CDC? How can they recommend 2000 guidelines for physicians to treat lyme? Haven't they learned anything new since 2000?

I travel too far, spend too much money to see a doctor that ignores what the CDC has to say. Why? Because the CDC isn't being held responsible to do their JOB.

If they are going to stand by the inaccurate information that they put out and it causes harm (which it has) then they are responsible - which they are.

Why isn't anyone holding them responsible?

I unstand they are a giant but even giants are required to "DO NO HARM" in the medical profession -

elle

Hmmmmm . . . . ISDA guidelines have been withdrawn

http://www.guideline.gov/browse/gawithdrawn.aspx?st=I

Item 9

--------------------
When I feel blue . . . . . . its time to take another breath

Posts: 296 | From East Coast | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tickedntx
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 5660

Icon 1 posted      Profile for tickedntx     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure, but I don't think that you can sue the USG.

Any lawyers out there?

--------------------
Suzanne Shaps
STAND UP FOR LYME Texas (www.standupforlyme.org)
(Please email all correspondence related to protecting Texas LLMDs to [email protected] with copy to [email protected])

Posts: 977 | From Austin, TX, USA | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They have been withdrawn, probably because a new version is coming out soon from IDSA. Worse than ever too.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
elle
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7721

Icon 1 posted      Profile for elle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey Lou - What do you think the CDC is referring to in the meantime and have they notified the physicians that are relying on the OLD guidelines that they have been withdrawn? Somehow I can't imagine my BC ID primary memorizing a new paragraph anytime soon.

elle

--------------------
When I feel blue . . . . . . its time to take another breath

Posts: 296 | From East Coast | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
melerle
Junior Member
Member # 8658

Icon 5 posted      Profile for melerle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Elle,
I am a newbie from MN. Diagnosed in Aug but feel that I have had LD for many years.

I just visited the LDF website and read "Topic #1" on the site which gives the same info you are questioning.

Mind you the Dr.s I have been dealing with are well aware of LD, but I feel that I am being undertreated rather than overtreated.

Do you think that because of the CDC and the ISDA stand on Chronic Lyme Disease (it does not exist) that Dr.s and the general medical community tend to ingnore our maladys because they need to stay within the medical guidelines, thus we are undertreated and made to believe we are imaging our physical problems?

Just wondering what others think.

Posts: 4 | From Minnesota | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
elle
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7721

Icon 1 posted      Profile for elle     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well I can't answer that in total but I'd be willing to provide a personal story that you may draw from. . . .


I have a friend who has had LD for 8 years, cdc positive, labcorp (almost impossible). She has seen several docs, neuros and even had surgery on her tendons by the top east coast hospital. She remains ill with LD.

She waited for an appointment with a well known BC ID doc in our area that sets the tone for ID in our community. He examined her records saw her new labs confirming her old CDC positive lyme diagnosis, took her hand and explained to her how she really needed a good psychotherapist because she had become obsessed with this "lyme" idea. He further explained she had received 6 weeks of doxy, 100mg 2x @ day 8 years ago and she was cured. The current tests were just showing residual antibodies in the blood.

So where do you think he got this bit of mis-information from?

--------------------
When I feel blue . . . . . . its time to take another breath

Posts: 296 | From East Coast | Registered: Aug 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DamnTics
Member
Member # 8667

Icon 1 posted      Profile for DamnTics     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by tickedntx:
I'm not sure, but I don't think that you can sue the USG.

Any lawyers out there?

I think you have to call your state's attorney general's office and have them investigate, they usually bring the suits against the feds... then you will see congressional hearings and such. But I think if "Joe Schmoe" brings a suit against the CDC (without the support of a AG) it will most likely get squashed.


**I am not an attorney nor claim to be, any information is not legal advice and should not be taken as such ** [Wink]

Posts: 19 | From Connecticut | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tequeslady
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6832

Icon 1 posted      Profile for tequeslady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It sure would be interesting though if we could file some kind of class action suit, if that's possible.
Posts: 856 | From Texas | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
5dana8
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7935

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 5dana8   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lets say that all the people that ended up with chronic lyme who got the lyme shuffle,swept under the rug,under treated ect...and basically left on the vine to die.

Where to file a case against the CDC or any of the medical establishments,ID's,GP's,Neuro ducks and all the other ducks,with their tired old saying "lyme is hard to get and easy to cure" stance.And two weeks doxy is will cure everyone.

Some day the real truth will come out and I think this is what scares them is the thought of being sued by hundred's of thousands of people that became chronic because of their ignorance,pride,and selfish self interests.

I think this is what really scares them,being sued and left penniless and in disgrace.

Their time will come for them to be held accountable.
Some day...the sooner the better before thousand more suffer.

Sorry for the long rant,Just had to get it out of my system [rant]

--------------------
5dana8

Posts: 4432 | From some where over the rainbow | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MizMo
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8389

Icon 1 posted      Profile for MizMo   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That same website lists 2004 guidelines from the
International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society

http://www.guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=4836&nbr=003481&string=lyme

We'd stand a better chance if these were being used here [Frown]

--------------------
http://scottsbt.com/maureen/mo2.htm

Posts: 145 | From Mystic Island, NJ 08087 | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
imanurse
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7022

Icon 4 posted      Profile for imanurse     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 


--------------------
**Eat Chocolate**

Posts: 942 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
5dana8
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7935

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 5dana8   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Cave76
Very good point.
Can't sue if we can't prove beyond a doubt that we have an active infection.Catch 22.

--------------------
5dana8

Posts: 4432 | From some where over the rainbow | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.