LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » THANKS for great letters!!!

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: THANKS for great letters!!!
lymelady
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6207

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lymelady   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Date published: 1/12/2006

Your article on Lyme disease was fantastic.

I've read many articles about Lyme disease and have even struggled through writing a few myself, trying to get the word out to the public before they, too, fall victim to the fastest-growing infectious disease in the country.

Unfortunately, as Lyme disease spreads throughout the country, many doctors and health departments are not recognizing the problems caused by tick-borne infections until many have been seriously affected.

The Free Lance-Star's article will truly help people who have unknowingly been suffering from a "tick attack," as Frances Bishopp did years ago.

It will also go a long way in educating the public about the consequences of a delayed diagnosis and improper treatment.


Name withheld


Terrific job by FLS in reporting Lyme disease

Date published: 1/12/2006

I read with appreciation your article about "Tin Cup" and her Lyme disease battle ["Ticked off," Jan. 8].

I grew up in Spotsylvania and now live in California. It was a thrill last weekend to not only see "The Free Lance-Star"--the paper I cut my teeth on--but even better to see an article on Lyme disease that was well-written and accurate.

I eluded Lyme despite many tick bites while growing up, only to move to sunny California and contract it several years ago on my wooded mountain property.

Like Tin Cup, doctors refused to consider I might have Lyme, in spite of blinding headaches, multiple brain lesions, a known bite and rash, and a host of other red flags.

A western blot was refused because the initial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was negative. A subsequent western blot was positive for Lyme.

One part of the problem is doctors' refusal to learn, and dogged reliance on dated medical texts.

They rely on the ELISA for Lyme "screening" and will not give the more sensitive western blot, despite evidence that the ELISA misses up to half of chronic Lyme cases.

Almost every doctor's standard of care includes this foolish and dangerous protocol, leading to the underreporting of Lyme and the misdiagnoses your article cites.

The typical Lyme patient is forced to educate himself far beyond what any other patient would just to get treatment.

It's a pervasive problem to which education is the answer. Your article goes a long way toward helping.


name withheld

Date published: 1/13/2006

Thanks for the great story about Frances Bishopp and Lyme disease.

It is important for people to know that this can be a serious disease and that so many people struggle daily with it.

Kudos to you for sharing her story.

Scott Forsgren
San Jose, Calif.

Date published: 1/13/2006


Thank you for the excellent article about Lyme disease and helping to raise awareness ["Ticked off," Jan. 8].

Lyme disease is a devastating illness that is under-diagnosed and under-treated. Cases are increasing throughout the country, yet patients must still fight for testing and treatment.

Immediate treatment is the only way to cure it quickly. Anyone who is bit by a tick needs to start antibiotics immediately.

Name witheld

[ 13. January 2006, 07:11 AM: Message edited by: lymelady ]

Posts: 484 | From Fredericksburg, Va USA | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lymelady
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6207

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lymelady   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
up, more letters, thanks and thanks
Posts: 484 | From Fredericksburg, Va USA | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lymelady:
Date published: 1/12/2006


Date published: 1/12/2006

I read with appreciation your article about "Tin Cup" and her Lyme disease battle ["Ticked off," Jan. 8].

I grew up in Spotsylvania and now live in California. It was a thrill last weekend to not only see "The Free Lance-Star"--the paper I cut my teeth on--but even better to see an article on Lyme disease that was well-written and accurate.

I eluded Lyme despite many tick bites while growing up, only to move to sunny California and contract it several years ago on my wooded mountain property.

Like Tin Cup, doctors refused to consider I might have Lyme, in spite of blinding headaches, multiple brain lesions, a known bite and rash, and a host of other red flags.

A western blot was refused because the initial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was negative. A subsequent western blot was positive for Lyme.

One part of the problem is doctors' refusal to learn, and dogged reliance on dated medical texts.

They rely on the ELISA for Lyme "screening" and will not give the more sensitive western blot, despite evidence that the ELISA misses up to half of chronic Lyme cases.

Almost every doctor's standard of care includes this foolish and dangerous protocol, leading to the underreporting of Lyme and the misdiagnoses your article cites.

The typical Lyme patient is forced to educate himself far beyond what any other patient would just to get treatment.

It's a pervasive problem to which education is the answer. Your article goes a long way toward helping.


name withheld

HEY!!!! That's MY letter!!! They printed it?? WAY COOL! And I did NOT withhold my name - wonder why they didn't put my name? Nevertheless, excellent!!!
[woohoo]

Michelle

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.