LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » very weak IGENX RESULTS HELP

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: very weak IGENX RESULTS HELP
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
rhumatologist was questioning why the IGG was neg. Looks like I had 4 bands not 5 which they say is needed for pos result?? They where thinking I may have a Motor neuron disease
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It sounds really likely that Lyme is the issue. Negative IgG is by CDC standards which is not the standard used by most doctors that are Lyme-literate. I would definitely get a LLMD before you do anything else. It is critical and this is your life....

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
WHAT SCOTT SAID!

That same rheumie would look at positive bands on IgM (the test for current infection) and make a stupid claim that having bands 31 and 34 positive aren't enough. Guaranteed. 'Cause it's not "CDC positive" -- therefore it must be something else.

Run away! He doesn't know what he's talking about.

Read the Newbie Links on Western Blot testing.

Then stop seeing this doctor, who is clueless. Find an LLMD.

Specific bands on western blot CANNOT react or turn positive to anything else other than the presence of borrelia burgdorferi. Doesn't matter how many bands you've got if they're certain bands and they match up with your symptoms.

Good luck.

Michelle

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mlkeen
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1260

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mlkeen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
you can't have just a little lyme, just like you can't be a little pregnant.
Posts: 1572 | From Pa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Thomas Parkman
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3669

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Thomas Parkman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Which Bands. The CDC are a pack of total idiots. Nobody with a grain of understanding of this disease takes them seriously any more. If you have four positive bands are they perhaps 34, 39 or 31. If one is 39 you do not need anything else. As an earlier writer has noted certain of these bands can be created only as a response to an infection of borrelia. What in the world are you doing with four positive bands and a test still be negative. That makes no sense. Further which bands, if any, were equivocal? You may e mail me privately if you wish. Also consult Dr. Charles Crist's essay on Western Blot. hope this helps. The ducks sure aren't. Cheers. Thomas Parkman

--------------------
Thomas Parkman

Posts: 341 | From Columbia SC 29206 | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry somehow my post got put into 2 sections. My results were

23-25 ++
31 ++
34 ++ IND
39 ++
41 ++
66 +
93 +
The IGG was Neg except for band 41 which was ind. THANKS FOR THE HELP

Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SAK
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7387

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SAK     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Check out http://www.personalconsult.com/articles/drjonesapproach.html

Dr. Jones says: "There are nine known [Lyme] Borrelia burgdorferi Genus species specific KDA Western Blot antibodies (bands): 18, 23, 31, 34, 37, 39, 83 and 93.

Only one of these Borrelia burgdorferi genus specific bands is needed to confirm that there is serological evidence of exposure to the Borrelia burgdorferi spirochete and can confirm a clinical diagnosis of Lyme Disease."

So, looks like you're positive for Lyme!
Hope this helps.

--------------------
Be well,
SAK
 -

Posts: 371 | From Up North | Registered: May 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
BostonLyme2005
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Here is a copy of my Igenex WB results as well.

Hi Guys,

I needed to do this again, so please bare with me, ok.

What do you think on these results? I have read some articles and know what others think, but always love to hear your voices.

If I was suffering from CFS/Fibro, would I have results like these from the WB testing?

Please remember I worked in a Humane Society wher we were informed about the presence of ticks. Some dogs had Lyme Disease, they were in seperate rooms.

I went there for 6-7 weeks in a row, always brushing off insects of all kinds, all over me, my clothes, in my car, hair, ears, etc.

I would on a daily basis brush them off me and the dogs..We would walk through the woods, Deers in the area as well.

Placing all this info together, I feel it is Lyme Disease!

Igenex IGM Result IND
CDC/NYS Result NEG

18 KDa +
41 KDa +
58 KDa +
66 KDa +
30 KDa IND

All other bands are -

Igenex IGG Result Neg
CDC/NYS Result NEG

41 KDa ++
58 KDa +
39 KDa IND
23-25 KDa IND

All other bands are -

PCR's are -
Serum -
Whole Blood -
Both Plasmid & Genomic

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HEATHERKISS
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6789

Icon 3 posted      Profile for HEATHERKISS     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry,

That ruemy definately does not know about Lyme. Investigate your Lyme option before this duck puts you on steriods.

I went to the top ruemy on Long Island in Great Neck. What an *** !!!!! This was a waste of time and $20.00 copay.

I still to this day hate him. Just my opinion.

He didn't do any tests. and proclaimed that I didn't have Lyme becuase I had already had a few months of Biaxin. Laughing in my face. Jerk.

Are you in NYC, Long Island or upstate?
http://www.lymeinfo.net

--------------------
HEATHER

 -

Posts: 1974 | From ABERDEEN, NJ 07747 | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Upstate Rockland area
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Troup Brazelton
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6297

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Troup Brazelton     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Please understand the difference between "surveillence" and "diagnostic".

The CDC issued standards for surveillance at 3 or 4 out of 5 IGM and 5 out of 10 for IGG or some such, to get an idea of where the disease was located. NOT TO BE USED FOR DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES

The standard for the CDC diagnoses is "clinical", meaning the doctor may begin treatment based of his findings during the examination in his office of the symptom presented.

Blood testing is then done to confirm clinical dx.

Any doctor you visit that does not know this should be informed. If he doesn't accept it, report him to your health board.

The CDC issued this correction of information in early 2001 after Bush signed an executive order requesting the SG to make this change public.

Posts: 219 | From Aubur,Al. USA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
5dana8
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7935

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 5dana8   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey 6t5frane

Like someone stated earlier. There is no such thing as having a little lyme.

You have lyme disease whether or not your uninformed rhumy will admitt it or not.

Times a tickin and the sooner you get a LLD and start treatment the sooner you will get better.

Lyme doesn't go away with time. It will only get worse.

If you need help finding a LLD , you can post the question here and people can pm you with referals,

Take care and for goodness sake get your lyme treated. Please do the right thing now,
the rest of your life is at stake.
dana

--------------------
5dana8

Posts: 4432 | From some where over the rainbow | Registered: Sep 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks Dana, Right now I have twitching in my calves and foot?? I have been diagnosed with Rhematoid Arthritis for 16 years, but since July new symptoms have arrived. My legs feel like jello
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
NP40
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6711

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NP40     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by 6t5frlane:
Thanks Dana, Right now I have twitching in my calves and foot?? I have been diagnosed with Rhematoid Arthritis for 16 years, but since July new symptoms have arrived. My legs feel like jello

Your tests are "off the chart" positive for lyme. Post over in the "Seeking a doctor" area of the forum and someone will PM you a knowledgeable doc contact info.

Bostonlyme, your tests show Bb bacteria is active as well.

Posts: 1632 | From Northern Wisconsin | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks to all. Just curious. Why Igenx " off the charts and 2 otherv tests local were neg??
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Gretchen P
Member
Member # 8403

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Gretchen P     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Igenex is a lyme-reputable lab which only tests for tick borne illnesses, therefor are more knowledgable in how to test for lyme.

My local lab tested me twice only to say I was negative, Igenex tested me positive on 10 bands.

--------------------
I'm gonna get that lyme !!!

Posts: 61 | From Erie, PA | Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by 6t5frlane:
Sorry somehow my post got put into 2 sections. My results were

23-25 ++
31 ++
34 ++ IND
39 ++
41 ++
66 +
93 +
The IGG was Neg except for band 41 which was ind. THANKS FOR THE HELP [/qb]

You're way more pregnant than I was!!

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You say more knowledgeable but isn't a Western Blot test the same anywhere???
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
6t5frlane (nice car by the way):

No- western blots are not standardized across the country, or for that matter from lab to lab. The sensitivity and specificity are not the same lab to lab either.

Very few conventional Dr.s will accept the results from a "reference" lab (Igenex).
Dr.s working for large teaching hospitals or Universities all have their blood contacts with one specific lab and won't accept the results from any other lab.

But remember this: The positive conventional criteria is set SO TIGHT for a positive
that it's VERY hard for someone who's had Lyme for a long time to satisfy this critera becuase Lyme supresses the immune system in some people.

Medicine is a business- and a pretty shoddy business in my opinion.

You're in for a rough ride- as the conventional Docs will tell you you don't have Lyme and you'll be confused and scared every time you buck them.

I would see a good Lyme literate Dr. Your tests clearly show you have Lyme.
Good Luck.
Barb

Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
After looking at fax from Dr it looks like band 31 is neg not pos. Crappy fax copy...sorry. does this cahnge anything?
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry the copy was bad. Band 31 is NEG not POS, everything else is the same as posted. Does this change anything. Thanks. Sorry for all the ?'s
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
NP40
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6711

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NP40     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by 6t5frlane:
Sorry the copy was bad. Band 31 is NEG not POS, everything else is the same as posted. Does this change anything. Thanks. Sorry for all the ?'s

Does it change anything ? Yes. You need to put new ink in your fax.

As far as being infected with lyme ? It doesn't change a thing, you have it.

Posts: 1632 | From Northern Wisconsin | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
6t5frlane
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8628

Icon 1 posted      Profile for 6t5frlane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
NP40 LOL......Thanks for the info
Posts: 355 | From NY | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.