LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Labs - Quest vs Labcorp

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Labs - Quest vs Labcorp
AliG
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for AliG     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Can anyone recommend one lab over the other?

Quest Diagnostics & Labcorp of America are covered by my insurance.

I was not positive enough at Quest and was thinking LabCorp might have different results.

I'm wondering if someone might have had experience with both.

--------------------
Note: I'm NOT a medical professional. The information I share is from my own personal research and experience. Please do not construe anything I share as medical advice, which should only be obtained from a licensed medical practitioner.

Posts: 4881 | From Middlesex County, NJ | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Both are lousy!!!!!!

Try MDL ...some LLMD's use that and sometimes it is covered by ins.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96227 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mlkeen
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1260

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mlkeen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
my llmd prefers quest, but why I do not know.
Posts: 1572 | From Pa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree that both are lousy... If your insurance covers any portion of IGeneX or MDL, I would go for those - or maybe just pay for it yourself if that is possible. I don't think Quest or LabCorp report IND bands on a WB for example.

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
mlkeen
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1260

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mlkeen     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Scott-

When you say IND do you mean individual bands when referring to quest?

yes, they do send a complete band break down.

If testing is used to confirm a or track the disease as our llmd uses it and not to deny treatment then using a lab that you insurance pays for isn't a problem. Our llmd was testing every two months when we started. This would have been a huge bill using MDL and cost nothing at quest.

I have tested positive for bart, RMSF, mycoplasma, ELISA and lyme specfic bands with quest. My son WB and mycoplasma. SO positive for WB, babs and mycoplasma. All with quest.

I was also positive with MDL.

It is really un-fair to get on here and bash labs or specific treatments.

Detailed pros and cons are more useful to newbies.

Posts: 1572 | From Pa | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymied
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6704

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymied     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I went through LabCorp twice here in the South - I was negative both times. In my circumstance they ran only the ELISA first...since that didn't come back positive they did not even do a Western Blot.

I then went through Quest at John's Hopkins...all tests were negative - not sure if they did a Western Blot because I never got to see my test results. When I called my doctor back a year later he said because I was not a regular patient my results were no longer on file (hmm?) Anyway, I was tested for Ehrlichia, Babesia, and Bartonella...along with a bunch of other stuff...all negative...

This JH doc gave me a script for two months of doxy though and urged me to get home and find another physician who specialized in Tick borne illness. Clinically he felt certain I had Ehrlichia.

Went through IgeneX - I was positive for IgM and IgG's for lyme - hme and hge of Ehrlichia and my Babesia FISH test was positive.

So there are my 'detailed pros and cons' ;0) You can imagine how I feel about LabCorp and Quest. I think their typical protocol is to run an ELISA first and if it isn't positive they do not go on to run a Western Blot. For someone like me that had been sick for at least two years that protocol doesn't work.

Go through IgeneX is my advice.

--------------------
�Pride is concerned with who is right. Humility is concerned with what is right.� - Ezre Taft Benson

Posts: 655 | From NC, Exit 88 on the Deer SuperHighway | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Western Blot explanation:
http://tinyurl.com/ffn3x

The IND or "equivocal" is explained in the above link.

I didn't mention that Igenex is my first choice as well.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96227 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686

Icon 1 posted      Profile for SForsgren         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IND means indeterminate. It means that if Quest sees "something" but not strongly enough to be a positive, they will not even tell you that they saw "something". IGeneX will and sometimes that is important.

--------------------
Be well,
Scott

Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Curley911
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 2205

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Curley911     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I see a focus on which lab to use but I'm focused on which test to use. I think the figure quoted to me was that 1 and 200 actually get a positive on the Elisa and the WB is grossly inaccurate no matter which lab you use.

Igenex surely has the best lab of all for the WB but even it can miss lyme. The Bowen test is $$ out of your own pocket but for me I couldn't waste any more time dinking around w/these tests. The Bowen tests for babs and ehrlichia, it picked up lyme and babesia on me.

I was already neg. from labcorp w/the WB and neg. with the PCR from Labcorp. It's five years after treatment now and I am working a full schedule and enjoying a rewarding life.

I hope you can get an answer soon.

Good Luck,
Curly

Posts: 982 | From Florida | Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeFighter
Member
Member # 9354

Icon 1 posted      Profile for LymeFighter     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In my personal opinion Igenex is the best out of all of them. If I had to pick a different one it would be Quest.

The most accurate test (in my opinion) is the Western Blot. Sometimes some of your "bands" will come back "indeterminant" or negative, but you could definitely still have Lyme and other co-infections!

Make sure you get tested for all of the Lyme co-infections...if you miss those you won't get better.

Ummm...Good luck and keep on keeping on...
Best wishes,
~LymeFighter

--------------------
"...Celebrate the bitter, the tart, the sweet of the here and now, all before it succumbs to the pull of what was and vanishes into a fog of what might have been." ~Susan R. Norton

Posts: 21 | From Northern California | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.