LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » IGENEX-YOUR THOUGHTS

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: IGENEX-YOUR THOUGHTS
wrthster
Member
Member # 11126

Icon 1 posted      Profile for wrthster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi,

I am new to Lyme, but what strikes me to be very strange is that this is that this is the only lab in the US that is considered reliable? Don't any of you find that strange?

They also have a very close affiliation with the Lyme Disease Association. In fact, I believe someone from Igenex sits on their board of directors.

I am just pointing this out, because without competition it makes it very easy for them to not take insurance, they have the full endorsement of the Lyme Disease Association. I just question, how much does money play into all of this?

Just my opinion and thoughts. It just seems very strange. Maybe some of you can shed some light on this since I am new. Thanks very much.

CA - Nick Harris, PhD Immunology
President IGeneX Reference Labs; Treasurer, ILADS, International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society; Member NCCLS Committee on Lyme; Diplomate, American Board of Medical Laboratory Immunology

Posts: 21 | From Tampa, Fl | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
timaca
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6911

Icon 1 posted      Profile for timaca     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
State University New York at Stonybrook and MDL labs are also considered good labs.

www.path.sunysb.edu/labs/ticklab/TICKLAB.htm

www.mdlab.com


Timaca

Posts: 2872 | From above 7,000 ft in a pine forest | Registered: Feb 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bubbear
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8976

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bubbear   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There are several labs that are considered reliable and are approved to do testing. Check out Central Florida Research Inc.

--------------------
Hugz, Tugz and Health to you!
Greg/bubbear
http://centralfloridaresearch.com
Treasure the love you receive above all. It will survive long after your good health has vanished.Og Mandino

Posts: 109 | From Central Florida | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TerryK
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 8552

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TerryK     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I understand why you would ask, I asked the same questions when I was new to lyme being the skeptical person that I am.

Unlike the other labs, IgeneX is highly specialized since they test only for tick borne diseases. In a nutshell, the IgeneX tests have been specifically designed to identify patients with all stages of lyme disease whereas most labs typically identify early lyme disease. There are currently 300 known strains of Borrelia but only one is typically tested for by most labs. IgeneX uses 2 strains thereby allowing more or less equal representation of all lyme antigens.
http://www.igenex.com/innovations3.htm

In my opinion, they are the best lab and they have earned it. The doctors involved with that lab are very kind and I do not believe they are in it for the money.

Terry

Posts: 6286 | From Oregon | Registered: Jan 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 7 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's your choice..

Prime rib or a hot dog?

[Big Grin]

Keep in mind.. in Maryland alone.. EACH YEAR.. over 2 MILLION dollars are paid for cheap and lousy Lyme tests that aren't even close to being accurate.

Many of those folks with negative tests go on to be classified as having some sort of "autoimmune" disorder rather than ever learning they have a bacterial infection that could be treated.

THAT is the crime of Lyme.

[Big Grin]

Being new to Lyme you sure seem to have an extra ordinary amount of knowledge about a lot of details... and some friends we've seen here before.

--------------------
www.TreatTheBite.com
www.DrJonesKids.org
www.MarylandLyme.org
www.LymeDoc.org

Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by wrthster:
Hi,

I am new to Lyme, but what strikes me to be very strange is that this is that this is the only lab in the US that is considered reliable? Don't any of you find that strange?

Yeah, it's REALLY strange!! You'd think as rotten as testing is, other labs would get better. But they DON'T. They're horrible. For example:

"The Western Blot is merely another antibody test. However, it is more specific than the ELISA. The test can test for 25 possible "bands" that relate to parts of Lyme or other infections.

But the routine Western Blot typically done has massive errors. In one serious test of the Lyme Western Blot testers, there was a stunning finding.

They used nine clearly infected patients and sent their blood to 18 labs. Of the IgG type of antibody, some labs were wrong. They missed 10 of 18 samples. For the IgM type of antibody, the labs were occasionally so bad they falsely reported Lyme as absent in 16 of 18 samples.
(Arch Intern Med 150:761-763, 1990).

I don't know about you but I'M not sending my blood to any of these labs.

quote:
They also have a very close affiliation with the Lyme Disease Association. In fact, I believe someone from Igenex sits on their board of directors.
Nick Harris volunteers a lot of time and expertise to the study of lyme disease and its detection. I think it's a credit that he is on the LDA Board! Thank goodness it's not Steere or Klempner or someone of that persuasion. There wouldn't even BE an LDA if so!

If you want to see a real piece of work of an advisory board, go check out the advisory board of the ALDF. A real treat.


It took me almost a year to pay off the ridiculous and expensive tests pushed on me by my clueless neurologist. By comparison, IGeneX was a bargain, and not only that, they got it right.

IGeneX is certified in New York, one of the toughest states in the country for certification. They scored over 95% in their proficiency tests from 2001-2005. Of 58 labs, only IGeneX had a perfect score on Western blot proficiency.

Perhaps you and Nimzovich think Dr. Harris should operate his lab for free, and all his employees should work for free?

[bonk]

??

Michelle

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wrthster
Member
Member # 11126

Icon 1 posted      Profile for wrthster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is a great group! Thank you all for your comments and suggestions. It is very helpful. Please keep them coming, I think this is a great topic.

And thanks to the poster who said I have a great deal of knowledge. When you have been to 50 doctors over the past 15 years, and one who is an LLMD you learn a heck of a lot. And each one seems to be a bigger idiot and more arrogant than the next, including the LLMD. It is very sad, and I think all of us are suffering, and not being given the attention we deserve.

That is why I have learned so much and pretty much through my own reading and research on the internet. Because if I left it entirely in these docs hands, I would probably be dead by now. Please keep it going, I am learning even more from all of you. I think all of us deserve honerary medical degrees by now.

Posts: 21 | From Tampa, Fl | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Karenelee
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 11044

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Karenelee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
MichelleM wrote:

<>

I'd like to get the citation/ reference for this piece of data. Where & when was it published?

I'd like to show it to a doctor who questions the credibility of the lab.

Also I did notice that the report on the poor performance of the other labs was dated 1990. Are there any more recent comparisons? Again, citations would be useful.

I have an llmd, and I'm sticking with her, but I (or the don quioxte in me) has one more "follow-up" appt with the IDS doc and I want to give her something to think about, in a serious way.

I have had 2 IGeneX WB positives, by *CDC Standards* and she told me I don't have Lyme. I know I shouldn' bother, just banging my head against the wall, but in my state this IDS doctor is seen as the state's leading lyme expert, and I hate to think of all the people with lyme she encounters and tells them they don't have lyme.

Karen

Posts: 112 | From RI | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Karenelee
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 11044

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Karenelee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oops,

Here is what michellem wrote:

IGeneX is certified in New York, one of the toughest states in the country for certification. They scored over 95% in their proficiency tests from 2001-2005. Of 58 labs, only IGeneX had a perfect score on Western blot proficiency.

Posts: 112 | From RI | Registered: Jan 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Michelle M   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Karenelee:
[Quote]
I have an llmd, and I'm sticking with her, but I (or the don quioxte in me) has one more "follow-up" appt with the IDS doc and I want to give her something to think about, in a serious way.

I have had 2 IGeneX WB positives, by *CDC Standards* and she told me I don't have Lyme. I know I shouldn' bother, just banging my head against the wall, but in my state this IDS doctor is seen as the state's leading lyme expert, and I hate to think of all the people with lyme she encounters and tells them they don't have lyme.

Karen

Karen, you're so right. I never had the pleasure of seeing an ID doc but rather a neurologist who is considered the best in my area.

I shudder to think of all the people he has misdiagnosed with MS and God knows what else, simply because he refuses to learn. Even when knowledge is presented to them on a platter, they turn away.

We have the IDSA to thank for this attitude.

They are able to look at dozens of peer-reviewed studies indisputably proving the persistence of the lyme bacteria, yet blithely announce 'these must all be due to cross-contamination in the lab.' Yup, right outta their new Guidelines.

Facts and scientific studies are of little interest to such doctors because it requires them to think for themselves.

You are to be commended for presenting your ID doc with facts.

When she scoffs that 'IGeneX gives everyone a positive,' you can let her know that on the contrary, only about 56% of IGeneX test results were positive as of 2003, pursuant to testimony given to the California Senate Committee on Health and Human Services in early 2004.

Now, if that seems high, keep in mind that these are not people off the street but patients already strongly suspected of having lyme.

Knowledge is power!!

[Wink]

Michelle

Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bubbear
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8976

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bubbear   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
More info


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2001/12/10/MN195999.DTL

--------------------
Hugz, Tugz and Health to you!
Greg/bubbear
http://centralfloridaresearch.com
Treasure the love you receive above all. It will survive long after your good health has vanished.Og Mandino

Posts: 109 | From Central Florida | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ldfighter
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9405

Icon 1 posted      Profile for ldfighter     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Some links for Karen:

http://tinyurl.com/qqrde
(newspaper article - only lab out of 58)

http://www.personalconsult.com/articles/igenexcerts.html
(results of proficiency testing, with a pdf link for download)

http://igenex.com/innovations3.htm
(explanation of how their western blot differs)


Yes, there's an awful lot of interest in Igenex lately.
http://flash.lymenet.org/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=3;t=017093

[ 05. March 2007, 11:36 AM: Message edited by: ldfighter ]

Posts: 621 | From US | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisianthus
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6631

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lisianthus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by wrthster:
When you have been to 50 doctors over the past 15 years, and one who is an LLMD you learn a heck of a lot. And each one seems to be a bigger idiot and more arrogant than the next, including the LLMD.

BTW----- If it weren't for our (what did wrthster call them? oh ya arrogant) [loco] LLMDS then I or any one of my family members would be dead right now! Geez I sure wouldn't be on abx and getting better. If left up to my PCP I would still be fighting to get 2 weeks of Doxy.


Well see if Steer or Wormser will treat you long term wrthster, and good luck with that.


Not sure how exactly how you have YOU to thank for not being dead...... Do you write your own scripts?


"I think nimzy just cloned himself."
And Cave, I second that motion!


ALSO I think wrthster is just trying to push our buttons.......

--------------------
yahoo 360 http://360.yahoo.com/my_profile-UqSNGiA9crUMRW.lFNGN5Jk-?cq=1

Posts: 986 | From Michigan | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
wrthster
Member
Member # 11126

Icon 1 posted      Profile for wrthster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi Karen,

To answer your question as to where I got this information and how recent was two days ago and on this web site. Click the following link and click board members. Please let me make it clear to all, I am not in any way accusing anyone of anything. I am pointing something out, and asking for opinions. That is all. I think the people on this board have the right to know.

http://www.lymediseaseassociation.org/Doctor_Referrals.html

To Lisianthus there is absolutely no reason to be obnoxious or rude to me. I am posting to bring this out in an open forum discussion in a positive and constructive way. Thank you. And know, I do not right my own scripts. I just use my brains and try as hard as I can like everyone else.

Posts: 21 | From Tampa, Fl | Registered: Feb 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lisianthus
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6631

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lisianthus   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't pretend to candy coat what I say.....


Yep, I can be sarcastic and pi$$y when someone comes on here attacking Nick Harris, Igenex and LLMDs. THEY SAVED ME, MY KIDS, and the rest of my family.


If it weren't for the above mentioned most of us would still be searching for answers and being told "its all in our heads". Cause Quest sure did a bang up job finding out we all had lyme..... NOT.


What you are saying is not at all positive and constructive. And people on this board are very well informed about Igenex & Nick Harris, & the LDA.

--------------------
yahoo 360 http://360.yahoo.com/my_profile-UqSNGiA9crUMRW.lFNGN5Jk-?cq=1

Posts: 986 | From Michigan | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
ldfighter
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9405

Icon 1 posted      Profile for ldfighter     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't blame anyone for being skeptical, and I agree everything should be out in the open. So if you go to the www.lymediseaseassociation.org site, you might also want to click on "Conflicts of Interest" link on the left sidebar, underneath "Information Menu", and download the Conflicts of Interest report.

It's long but full of good information. Turns out many of the same the folks who created the CDC test criteria held potentially (very) profitable test-related and vaccine patents. In fact, what they ultimately did was adopt SmithKline Beecham's definition of lyme (the vaccine manufacturer), which was presented to the CDC five months in advance of their conference.

Based on what came out of this conference, the majority of labs today unfortunately do not report all positive bands - even lyme specific ones like OspA and OspB. Igenex does, and so do a few others. That's one reason most people here and many LLMDs find these labs to be superior. And since Igenex is the only lab to my knowledge using more than one strain, that and their solid proficiency results are enough to earn more of my trust than any other lab out there.

Posts: 621 | From US | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ann-OH
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2020

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ann-OH     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey Bugbear
that site you posted for an article about investigating Igenex was dated 2001. Igenex has passed all challenges given it by the state and even the federal examiners several times since that article was published.

Old news is no news.

Ann - OH

--------------------
www.ldbullseye.com

Posts: 5705 | From Ohio | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bubbear
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8976

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bubbear   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IGeneX is certified in New York, one of the toughest states in the country for certification. They scored over 95% in their proficiency tests from 2001-2005. Of 58 labs, only IGeneX had a perfect score on Western blot proficiency.
Michelle [/QB][/QUOTE]

Only posted the OLD news due to this post. I'm not against anyone here. And if Old news is no news several others are no news also. Several posted are from 2003.

--------------------
Hugz, Tugz and Health to you!
Greg/bubbear
http://centralfloridaresearch.com
Treasure the love you receive above all. It will survive long after your good health has vanished.Og Mandino

Posts: 109 | From Central Florida | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Lisianthus:
What you are saying is not at all positive and constructive. And people on this board are very well informed about Igenex & Nick Harris, & the LDA.

Yep

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.