LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Sweeping Cancer Edict: Take Vitamin D Daily

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Sweeping Cancer Edict: Take Vitamin D Daily
NorthernLyme1
Member
Member # 8992

Icon 1 posted      Profile for NorthernLyme1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
For a short video and links to related articles, go to http://tinyurl.com/37rthv

Sweeping Cancer Edict: Take Vitamin D Daily

Recommendation comes on heels of U.S. study suggesting supplement slashes risk of disease by as much as 60 per cent

MARTIN MITTELSTAEDT

The Globe and Mail
June 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM EDT

TORONTO -- The Canadian Cancer Society plans to announce Friday that all adults should start taking vitamin D, coinciding with the release of a groundbreaking U.S. study indicating the supplement cuts the risk of cancer by an astounding 60 per cent.

The move is believed to be the first time a major public-health organization has endorsed daily use of the sunshine vitamin as a cancer-prevention therapy for an entire population.

It follows a flurry of research suggesting the low-cost vitamin confers a high degree of protection against a wide variety of cancers. There are also striking study results suggesting that people who develop the disease often have low blood levels of vitamin D.

Although it is not known how many of the approximately 160,000 cancer cases diagnosed annually in Canada might be avoided by regular popping of a vitamin D pill, the cancer society said these findings are so compelling it felt it had to start urging people to act on them.

"We're hoping that in making this recommendation we'll be able to make some headway in cancer prevention," said Heather Chappell, senior manager of cancer control policy.

The society has tailored its recommendation to skin colour, which determines how much of the vitamin a person makes naturally when naked skin is exposed to strong, ultraviolet sunlight. Darker skin contains pigments that reduce production.

The society says whites should take supplements containing 1,000 international units a day during fall and winter, the six months of the year when sunlight falling on Canada isn't strong enough for skin to fulfill its vitamin D role.

Those with dark skin, who don't go outside frequently or wear full body clothing for cultural or religious reasons, such as veiled women, should take 1,000 IU year-round.

It would cost as little as about $15 for a year's supply of this amount of vitamin, indicating that, as an anti-cancer therapy, the over-the-counter supplement has extremely modest cost.

Currently, Health Canada recommends only 200 IU to 600 IU daily, depending on age. These amounts were based on vitamin D's recognized ability to prevent bone problems, but are too low to prevent cancer.

Some oily fish, such as sardines, naturally contain low amounts of vitamin D, as does milk, which is fortified with small amounts. Although diet is a source, about 90 per cent of the vitamin in people comes from sunlight.

The federal government says it is watching the cancer research and intends to make the review of its recommendations a high priority.

"Health Canada is aware of recent research on the role of vitamin D and of the evidence suggesting that vitamin D insufficiency may be a concern in Canada," the federal agency said in an e-mail statement to The Globe and Mail.

There are about 200 different kinds of cells with receptors for vitamin D, which plays a strong role in boosting immune function and repairing damaged cells. These factors may explain its anti-cancer properties.

The cause of the cancer epidemic sweeping the world has long eluded researchers, but the U.S. study being released today found that the 60-per-cent risk reduction is the strongest evidence to date that many cases of the disease are linked to a vitamin deficiency.

Over the past few decades, vitamin D levels in the public have likely fallen because of lifestyle changes, such as the use of sunscreen in summer and people spending more time indoors.

"It's an important component of cancer prevention," said Joan Lappe, lead author of the study and professor of medicine and nursing at Creighton University in Omaha, who added that there is "overwhelming evidence supporting the need for higher vitamin D intakes in populations throughout the world."

In the experiment, a group of women were given 1,100 IU of vitamin D a day, just a bit more than the cancer society is recommending, over a four-year period.

The women taking the supplement had vitamin D blood levels more than double those typically found in Canadians in winter. Their cancer incidence was dramatically lower than another group of women receiving a dummy pill.

It is the first large-scale, randomized, placebo-controlled experiment, the gold standard for testing drug efficacy, to prove cancer-prevention effects from vitamin D.

A paper outlining the finding is appearing in the current issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Almost every type of cancer monitored, including breast, colon and lung, was lower in the vitamin D group. In the experiment, vitamin D was accompanied by a dose of calcium, part of a separate experiment to see if the mineral helped prevent bone fractures, but the researchers believe the vitamin was responsible for driving down the cancer rate.

"This is really potentially big stuff," said Reinhold Vieth, a University of Toronto professor who is an expert on vitamin D.

There weren't any serious side effects, so the supplement also appears to be an unusually safe therapy.

The cancer society's Ms. Chappell called on health agencies to fund further vitamin D trials to confirm both the findings in the new U.S. study, and do research on higher doses, to see if this cuts risk even further.

Among the cancers linked to low levels of the vitamin in previous research are those of the breast, rectum, ovary, prostate and pancreas, as well as multiple myeloma.

Posts: 59 | From Canada | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
MagicAcorn
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8786

Icon 1 posted      Profile for MagicAcorn     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
For Gwen and others

--------------------
 -

Posts: 1279 | From In hiding | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Al
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9420

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Al     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank's Northernlyme, Great Information.

I found it very interesting that many people with lyme are low in Vit.D
Anyone have any information as to why?
Al

Posts: 789 | From CT, | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gwenb
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 7217

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gwenb     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I personally believe, because adequate vitamin D levels help fight infections, that some people who have healthy vitamin D levels can have Lyme disease and be asymptomatic, whereas other people with low levels will be more symptomatic.

Just a theory.

Gwen

Posts: 227 | From vancouver,bc | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Cobweb
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
^
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
D Bergy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9984

Icon 1 posted      Profile for D Bergy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This study cannot be correct according to most doctors I have seen in my lifetime.

They basically have told me that supplements of any kind just give you expensive urine.

Hard to believe that it took this long to do such a fundamental study. Millions have died waiting for this to be "officially recognized". Now it should take about 10 years before the average doctor actually recommends taking vitamin D.

If a logical course of action was taken Medicare and Medicaid should pay for Vitamin D supplements as a way to save costs on heath care.

D Bergy

Posts: 2919 | From Minnesota | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
luvs2ride
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8090

Icon 1 posted      Profile for luvs2ride     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
D Bergy said:

If a logical course of action was taken Medicare and Medicaid should pay for Vitamin D supplements as a way to save costs on heath care.

Hear! Hear!

Luvs

--------------------
When the Power of Love overcomes the Love of Power, there will be Peace.

Posts: 3038 | From america | Registered: Oct 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dguy
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8979

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dguy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Al:
I found it very interesting that many people with lyme are low in Vit.D
Anyone have any information as to why?
Al

Most Lymies are actually high in the important form of Vitamin D: 1,25D, which is the biologically active form. Yet, the form of the vitamin most often tested is 25D, which is essentially inert until converted to 1,25D by the kidneys.

Most Lymies are low in 25D and high in 1,25D because the infection performs the conversion extra-renally (i.e. outside the kidneys) thereby bypassing the body's normal balancing self-regulation. This tends to deplete the 25D and create excess 1,25D.

Posts: 727 | From USA | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.