LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » is it possible to have a babs w/o lyme and still be symptomatic

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: is it possible to have a babs w/o lyme and still be symptomatic
adamm
Unregistered


Icon 5 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Or does it only cause illness if you're immunocompromised?

Someone told me that research has sown this to be the case--has

it? What about the bartonella-like organisms ticks can introduce

your system?

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What were the statistics?

Lymetoo has posted this many, many times.

I think upwards to 60% of those infected with babs are known to be infected with Lyme as well.

I guess that would leave the possibility of 40% or greater that could have babesia in isolation.

However, I would find that most unlikely in TBD's.

Have you had a Western Blot from Igenex done yet?

Aren't you scheduled to see a LLMD soon?

Hang in there. All of the answers are coming.

Hugs,

Geneal

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jmo
Member
Member # 13141

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jmo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think I'm in the 40% where I just have babesia (found through a Ignex PCR).
I did get a Igenex Western Blot test done yesterday, so it could change... but my LLMD think's it's just Bab's clinically. I suppose he could be wrong... but he has seen other cases where it's just been babesia and no Lyme ( a few). But I'm not sure about research on the matter.
I wasn't immunocompromised I was extrememly healthy, wasn't on any medicine and exercise and ate healthy. I have had a horrible time with it and having quite the time getting rid of it as well. So again, not from research but my experience is that it's nasty and it can cause illness without being immunocomprimised and you can get it without having Lyme.

Best

Posts: 45 | From MA | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
minoucat
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5175

Icon 1 posted      Profile for minoucat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
adamm, babesia is best documented in veterinary literature, particularly by the grayhound racing people and cattle people.

In dogs, babesia all by itself can cause disabling health problems. It is in no way self limiting and contracting it is not associated with being immunocompromised.

I have not seen it described as self-limiting in humans, but there is very little available human research into babs at all.

What I HAVE seen described as self limiting, and which is therefore dismissed as a serious illness, is bartonella. It does indeed seem to be worse as part of a coinfection, but there was also a recent paper by a veterinarian who questioned the whole "self-limiting in humans" assumption -- he said bartonella had had plenty of time to adapt to human hosts and there was no reason to believe it had not become able to live parasitically (and destructively) long-term in humans.

(If anyone can find that paper, I'd appreciate it. I can't remember the author or the title, but it was something about adaptation by zoonotic diseases and the explosion of the number of pets (and therefore exposures to animal diseases by humans).

Our own experience with babesia is that is is just as bad, or worse, than Bb in causing both physical and neurological problems, and just as hard to get rid of.

Good luck.

--------------------
*********************

RECIDITE, PLEBES! Gero rem imperialem!
(Stand aside plebians! I am on imperial business.)



Posts: 2331 | From WA | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.