EMBARGOED UNTIL 4 P.M. ET, WEDNESDAY, OCT. 10, 2007
Columbia University Medical Center Leads First Placebo-Controlled Study of Cognitive Impairment Due to Chronic Lyme Disease
Findings Show Severe Physical Dysfunction Among Patients & Benefit of Repeated IV Antibiotic Therapy to Provide Long-Term Symptom Relief
NEW YORK - Findings from the first placebo-controlled study of chronic cognitive impairment after treated Lyme disease (also known as chronic Lyme encephalopathy) demonstrate that patients report moderate cognitive impairment, physical dysfunction comparable to patients with congestive heart failure, and fatigue comparable to patients with multiple sclerosis. In the study, repeated intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy was shown to be effective in treating cognitive dysfunction and the debilitating pain, fatigue and physical dysfunction associated with this disease.
The study, titled ``A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Repeated IV Antibiotic Therapy for Lyme Encephalopathy,'' will be published on-line by the journal Neurology on Oct. 10, 2007. The study was led by Principal Investigator Brian Fallon, M.D., M.P.H., director of the recently established Lyme and Tick-borne Disease Research Center at Columbia University Medical Center (http://www.cumc.columbia.edu/news/press_releases/fallon_lyme_center.html).
The research was conducted jointly at the Columbia University Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute and was funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS).
``These findings replicate results from a prior placebo-controlled trial of post-Lyme fatigue, which found positive treatment results from repeated antibiotic therapy. They also replicate the degree of physical impairment results demonstrated in another prior study of chronic Lyme disease,'' said Dr. Fallon (*see citations below).
``The door should be left open for physicians to prescribe medications as warranted, after a careful discussion with the patient of the potential risks and benefits.''
Dr. Fallon and his research team identified patients with cognitive problems that developed after being diagnosed with Lyme disease and which persisted or relapsed despite prior treatment, in order to determine whether patients who have already received the ``standard'' course of antibiotic treatment (three weeks of IV antibiotic therapy), would benefit from an additional 10 weeks of antibiotic therapy.
They also set out to determine whether patients relapse when taken off antibiotics or whether the alleviation of symptoms is sustained or enhanced with time.
Study participants (57 subjects: 37 patients with a history of Lyme disease and 20 controls) were divided into three subject groups: patients with a history of treated Lyme disease who were randomized to IV treatment with an antibiotic called ceftriaxone for 10 weeks; patients with a history of treated Lyme disease who were randomized to IV placebo for 10 weeks; and, healthy controls who were tested at the same time points as the patients to help to control for the practice effect on neuropsychological testing.
All patients had to meet criteria for memory impairment at the start of the study and they were also required to have a positive IgG Western blot for Lyme disease at study entry.
Key findings from the Neurology paper are as follows:
Cognition
� There was significantly greater improvement in cognition in the antibiotic treated sample at the primary end point for efficacy (week 12).
� When patients were retested three months after antibiotic treatment, the initial gains in cognition for the ceftriaxone-randomized sample were no longer present.
� Patients lose their cognitive improvement when IV antibiotic therapy is stopped.
Pain, Fatigue and Physical Dysfunction
� Among patients with greater severity at the start of the study, those randomized to ceftriaxone had more significant symptom relief of pain, fatigue, and physical dysfunction at week 12, as compared to those patients who did not receive ceftriaxone.
� Patients initially randomized to IV ceftriaxone who had greater severity of symptoms at baseline continued to show reduced pain and improved physical functioning at week 24. Improvement in fatigue continued, but was no longer statistically different from placebo at week 24.
� Repeated IV antibiotic therapy is effective in improving cognition, and among the more impaired, in improving pain, fatigue, and physical dysfunction.
Safety
� 18.9 percent of the 37 patients had serious adverse effects associated with either the IV line or a reaction to the antibiotic itself. Although all fully recovered, IV antibiotic therapy has the potential for serious risks, such as systemic infection, thrombus formation, or allergic reactions.
Clinical Recommendations
� Repeated IV antibiotic therapy should be considered a valuable option with long-term benefit for managing the disabling symptoms associated with chronic Lyme disease.
� Given the risks and benefits associated with IV antibiotic therapy, physicians and patients need to have a thoughtful discussion prior to initiating treatment.
*Citations from Recently Published Research
� The percentage of patients with meaningful improvement in fatigue noted at six months in this Neurology study (66.7 percent for patients treated with ceftriaxone vs. 25 percent for placebo) was comparable to the improvement in fatigue noted after repeated IV ceftriaxone therapy in a prior placebo controlled study (64 percent for drug vs. 18.5 percent for placebo) (Krupp et al., Neurology, 2003).
� The degree of physical impairment (comparable to congestive heart failure) was comparable to the impairment noted in another chronic Lyme study (Klempner et al., NEJM, 2001).
``Future research needs to focus on identifying a treatment approach that either allows not only for acute efficacy, but also long-term cognitive improvement; or, a treatment that could be given after the IV antibiotic therapy that would allow for sustained or enhanced cognitive improvement over time. Our Lyme and Tick-borne Disease Research Center continues to work towards finding these solutions,'' said Dr. Fallon. ``The most important lesson of this study is that physicians and patients need to collaborate openly to design an individual treatment plan to manage the long-term and complex suffering from symptoms of chronic Lyme disease.''
- ### -
Columbia University Medical Center provides international leadership in basic, pre-clinical and clinical research, in medical and health sciences education, and in patient care. The medical center trains future leaders and includes the dedicated work of many physicians, public health professionals, dentists, nurses, and scientists at the College of Physicians & Surgeons, the Mailman School of Public Health, the College of Dental Medicine, the School of Nursing, the biomedical departments of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, and allied research centers and institutions. www.cumc.columbia.edu
PATIENT QUERIES: - To schedule a clinical evaluation for patients with neurocognitive or neuropsychiatric problems from Lyme disease, please call 212-543-6508. - To schedule a research evaluation for possible participation in a diagnostic study, please call 212-543-6510. - Please note: As of June 4, 2007, the center is not currently conducting any active treatment trials.
Thanks, TC! We can celebrate with ice cream, now, right?
-------------------- more light, more love more truth and more innovation Posts: 3783 | From somewhere other than here | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Great news. EXCELLENT in fact. Thanks so much. Not solely an asset to the non lyme-literate medical community... to have a journal article proving extended IV therapy beneficial for the treatment of chronic lyme...
BUT also helpful so my extended family can see why I remain on antibiotics well over two years after my neuro-lyme diagnosis.
posted
up
Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |
Jellybelly
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7142
posted
This is great news! To have something so conclusive!!! Can't wait to see how the media handles this one!!!!
Posts: 1251 | From california | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Fantastic news!!!!!! THe final conclusions re: placebo effect vs. real is remarkable! 65% vs. 20%. SURE BLOWS THE IDSA'S recent NEJM article comments on placebo effects out of the water!
Anneke
Posts: 364 | From California | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829
posted
Jelly..
You said.. "This is great news! To have something so conclusive!!! Can't wait to see how the media handles this one!!!!"
Guess what?
YOU and everyone here IS our media.
We have no paid folks or money to pay them to get this word all over the place.
Once I have time to make a plan up we can all share in the business of getting it out there.
First we need to read it and should be able to see it tomorrow. Then we can work together to be the PR this article deserves.
In the meantime.. if you are out and about.. you might want to pick up a thank you card for Dr. Fallon. I'll be sending one for sure.
You can't imagine what he has gone through for us and how long he has worked on this project. And how many years he has fought a bunch of toads in order to help all of us.
Heck.. if I thought he liked ice cream, I'd share mine with him.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm... on second thought... it isn't like he invented a kitchen that never needs to be cleaned... or a time machine that could transport me from here to Costa Rica and back without mussing up my hair.
posted
What wonderful timing after the NEJM paper.
Thanks also to Tincup for creating the anticipation and to those who wrote ideas that made me laugh out loud.
Chiz
Posts: 67 | From UK | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
Foggy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1584
posted
PUT that in the Other Camp's Pipe!
Folks, please fwd this to any reporter who uses the "No scienticfic data" retort.
This is the epitome of what I've been ranting about for years. We NEEDED a renowned academic research institute to champion our cause and produce research data verifying what our LLMD's have known for years.
Posts: 2451 | From Lyme Central | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged |
David95928
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3521
posted
I think this is huge but still a beginning. The fight is far from over and the IDSA (I won't insult innocent creatures by referring to them as toads) will claim it's "poorly designed," as anything with which they disagree is. Still, it a major crack in the wall the IDSA has attempted to build around us. Is there a link to the actual article yet?
-------------------- Dave Posts: 2034 | From CA | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
Itsy_bitsyone
Unregistered
posted
went to the link...
did not see this article
is there a direct link or a link to the published study?
IP: Logged |
David95928
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3521
posted
Is someone getting this infromation to AG Blumenthal? He would probably be interested and, most particlarly, might be interested if journals whose editorial boards are dominated by these IDSA creeps declined to publish it. David
-------------------- Dave Posts: 2034 | From CA | Registered: Jan 2003
| IP: Logged |
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200
posted
This study was SO rigorously put together it will withstand the expected barrage of scrutiny and come out shining.
I remember a lot of people who tried to get enrolled but for various reasons could not.
I mean the criteria were TOUGH.
And that was the reason: Because it was bound to be picked apart ruthlessly down the road.
Dr. Fallon, unlike certain of his IDSA counterparts, is a scrupulous researcher. While he may have had his suspicions, he did not design the study to support a predetermined goal but rather, to seek the truth.
And that makes him a hero, in my book.
Michelle
Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829
And yes.. things have been and still are going on furuiosly behind the scenes to update AG and all concerned. You wouldn't believe the amount of work going on.
We are blessed to have the LDA, ILADS and other volunteers across the country working in our best interests.
Melanie Reber
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 3707
posted
It looks as though one must have a subscription to get the whole thing. Can anyone help us here? ..........................................
A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of repeated IV antibiotic therapy for Lyme encephalopathy
B. A. Fallon MD*, J. G. Keilp PhD, K. M. Corbera MD, E. Petkova PhD, C. B. Britton MD, E. Dwyer MD, I. Slavov PhD, J. Cheng MD, PhD, J. Dobkin MD, D. R. Nelson PhD, and H. A Sackeim PhD
From the Department of Psychiatry (B.A.F., J.G.K., K.M.C., E.P., I.S., J.C., H.A.S.), Department of Biostatistics (E.P.), Department of Neurology (C.B.B.), Department of Medicine (E.D., J.D.), and New York State Psychiatric Institute (B.A.F., J.G.K., K.M.C., E.P., I.S., J.C., H.A.S.), Columbia University, New York; and Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston (D.R.N.).
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected].
Background: Optimal treatment remains uncertain for patients with cognitive impairment that persists or returns after standard IV antibiotic therapy for Lyme disease.
Methods: Patients had well-documented Lyme disease, with at least 3 weeks of prior IV antibiotics, current positive IgG Western blot, and objective memory impairment. Healthy individuals served as controls for practice effects. Patients were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of double-masked treatment with IV ceftriaxone or IV placebo and then no antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was neurocognitive performance at week 12--specifically, memory. Durability of benefit was evaluated at week 24. Group differences were estimated according to longitudinal mixed-effects models.
Results: After screening 3368 patients and 305 volunteers, 37 patients and 20 healthy individuals enrolled. Enrolled patients had mild to moderate cognitive impairment and marked levels of fatigue, pain, and impaired physical functioning. Across six cognitive domains, a significant treatment-by-time interaction favored the antibiotic-treated group at week 12. The improvement was generalized (not specific to domain) and moderate in magnitude, but it was not sustained to week 24.
On secondary outcome, patients with more severe fatigue, pain, and impaired physical functioning who received antibiotics were improved at week 12, and this was sustained to week 24 for pain and physical functioning. Adverse events from either the study medication or the PICC line were noted among 6 of 23 (26.1%) patients given IV ceftriaxone and among 1 of 14 (7.1%) patients given IV placebo; these resolved without permanent injury.
Conclusion: IV ceftriaxone therapy results in short-term cognitive improvement for patients with posttreatment Lyme encephalopathy, but relapse in cognition occurs after the antibiotic is discontinued. Treatment strategies that result in sustained cognitive improvement are needed.
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/