LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Map of Total Lyme Cases "Reported" by CDC 1990-2006

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Map of Total Lyme Cases "Reported" by CDC 1990-2006
Sammi
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 110

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sammi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Someone just sent this to me. Be sure to read the small print on the bottom!
(I hope this has not been posted already. I looked and did not see it.)

http://lymediseaseassociation.org/Maps/usa_total.gif

Posts: 4682 | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow...Texas made the map! It usually shows up with very few cases.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
hcconn22
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 5263

Icon 1 posted      Profile for hcconn22   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is great; I wonder if there will be an updated one for 2007?

--------------------
Positive 10 bands WB IGG & IGM
+ Babesia + Bartonolla and NOW RMSF 3/5/09 all at Quest

And still positive ELISA and WB two years after IV treatment
http://www.lymefriends.org/profile/blake

Posts: 607 | From Tick Town, Connecticut | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 10 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
sammi,

are you able to copy and paste the small print here which will ENLARGE it for neuro lymiees like me? hope so! or someone else do it pretty please? big thanks! [group hug] [kiss]


blake,, they are NOT done yearly by CDC from what i've seen the past 3 years.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 3 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
also, send the link of post or direct thread to your HOME LYME LIST GROUPS; start spreading the word! thanks mike; you beat me this time! [kiss]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sammi
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 110

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sammi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Realize these numbers are the cases reported from 1990-2006. We all know they are MUCH higher.

The small print at the bottom says:

"Note CDC says Lyme disease is under reported and that only about 10% of cases that meet CDC surveillance criteria are actually reported to CDC. (For example, Oklahoma 362 reported cases = 3,620 probable cases meeting CDC criteria.)"

They are saying the number of cases that meet THIER criteria is ten times greater than reported. As we all know, many people who have Lyme are not CDC positive (with good reason). So imagine what the real number of cases are.

Posts: 4682 | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
CaliforniaLyme
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 7136

Icon 1 posted      Profile for CaliforniaLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yup I posted it yesterday but lots of peopple never saw it that saw yours*)!*)! That's the GOOD thing about multiple postings*)*!)! Half of us don't see the first one anyways*)!*)*!!!!!!!!

--------------------
There is no wealth but life.
-John Ruskin

All truth goes through 3 stages: first it is ridiculed: then it is violently opposed: finally it is accepted as self evident. - Schopenhauer

Posts: 5639 | From Aptos CA USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bettyg
Unregistered


Icon 10 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
sammi, thx for copying the small print for me!! [group hug]
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daisys
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 11802

Icon 1 posted      Profile for daisys     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Whoa, reality check here:
I spent one summer month in North Dakota in 1970. Every day I picked 40-60 ticks off the dog. Yes, every day! That's farm country, a lot of people are out in the countryside rather than in towns.

So, only 24 North Dakotans in 16 years got bit by infected ticks??? [Roll Eyes]

Posts: 563 | From New Mexico, USA | Registered: May 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Sammi
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 110

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Sammi     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
CA Lyme, I apologize! I looked and did not see it posted already.

bettyg, I am happy to help [Smile]

I think we all know these numbers are grossly under-reported.

Posts: 4682 | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pam S
Member
Member # 13144

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pam S     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You also have to remember that there are so many people that have this that don't know that they have it. They think that they are just getting old with arthritis (like me) and don't think to get tested.

And all of the misdiagnosed ones. Of course, that number is going to be higher.

And if the ducks we continue to see are not open minded, well, it will just continue to be under-reported.

--------------------
Those who say it can't be done, should get out of the way of those who are doing it!

Posts: 34 | From South Dakota | Registered: Sep 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.