LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Western Blot Results - Opinions needed!

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Western Blot Results - Opinions needed!
B and M
Member
Member # 13544

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B and M     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
We received my wife's Wester Blot results from Igenex. The results are below. While the test states negative. I feel these are significant results. Based on the experience of the group would you please give me your opinion of the results?


IgM Western Blot: NEGATIVE

18 kDa -
22 kDa -
23-25 kDa -
28 kDa -
30 kDa -
31 kDa -
34 kDa +
39 kDa -
41 kDa -
45 kDa -
58 kDa -
66 dDa -
73 kDa -
83-93 kDa IND

IgG Western Blot: NEGATIVE

18kDa -
22 kDa -
23-25 kDa -
28 kDa -
30 kDa -
31 kDa IND
34 kDa -
39 kDa IND
41 kDa ++
45 kDa -
58 kDa +
66 kDa +
73 kDa -
83-93 kDa -


Thanks,
B & M

Posts: 65 | From Georgia | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You will need to continue refreshing your screen , as I add things:

From Dr C's explanation on the WB test:

Western Blot explanation:
http://tinyurl.com/ffn3x

"Many would say the " +/-" equivocal ["IND"] bands are not significant. The problem I have with that, is that there are "-" negative bands. The lab has no trouble calling some bands negative. So they must be seeing something when they put "+/-" at some bands.

The only thing that makes sense, is that there is a little bit of that antibody present in your serum. If the "+/-" equivocal is reported on the borrelia associated bands, it is usually significant, in my clinical experience. This is a strong clue that I am on the right track.

Instead of ignoring these, they should be a red flag to keep pursuing a laboratory diagnosis. Giving patients 4 weeks of antibiotics (usually tetracycline, 500 mg, 3 times a day), will convert a negative or equivocal Western blot to positive in about 36% of cases.

As mentioned, if these positive blots are found by specialty labs, over 99% of those patients will respond to antibiotics."

------------------
BANDS:
"39: Unknown what this antigen is, but based on research at the National Institute of Health (NIH), other Borrelia (such as Borrelia recurrentis that causes relapsing fever), do not even have the genetics to code for the 39 kDa antigen, much less produce it. It is the most specific antibody for borreliosis of all.

41: Flagella or tail. This is how Borrelia burgdorferi moves around, by moving the flagella. Many bacteria have flagella. This is the most common borreliosis antibody.

66: Heat shock protein. This is the second most common borrelia antibody.

83: This is the DNA or genetic material of Borrelia burgdorferi. It is the same thing as the 93, based upon the medical literature. But laboratories vary in assigning significance to the 83 versus the 93.

93: The DNA or genetic material of Borrelia burgdorferi.

In my clinical experience, if a patient has symptoms suspicious for borreliosis, and has one or more of the following bands, there is a very high probability the patient has borreliosis.

The significant antibodies, in my opinion, are the 18, 23-25, 28, 30, 31, 34, 39, 58, 66 and 93."

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
LymeMECFSMCS
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 13573

Icon 1 posted      Profile for LymeMECFSMCS   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This looks pretty similar to my W. Blot (which was negative). I had positive bands 30, 41, and 58 plus an indeterminate 39 on the IgG, and an indeterminate 34 on the IgM. Some very similar bands to this. My LLMD felt the indeterminate 39 on the IgG and the ind. 34 on the IgM were particularly significant as those -- in her opinion -- were the most specific to Lyme. I had a positive IFA test for Lyme as well so that helped. My LLMD also felt I tested too soon and that I might have more positive bands now: she is retesting me.

How soon after the tick bite was this administered? That can make a big difference.

I'm sure others will tell you other bands on here are definitely significant. Please remember Lyme is a clinical diagnosis, so the whole picture must be taken into account, including any and all symptoms, rashes, etc.

Posts: 929 | From Massachusetts | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
B and M
Member
Member # 13544

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B and M     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm sorry I should have posted mor information.

My wife has been ill for years. Nobody has benn able to tell us what it was. Typical symptoms, fatigue, pain, also chronic infections. According to most of her doctors it was just depression. That diagnosis did not fit with the fact that she got better briefly with any antibotics. Unfortunately, the good spells in between antibotics got shorter and shorter. Now it does not get better anymore.

She actually thinks here entire family has it and she was born with it. We lived in NY for most of our lives. She really could have gotten it anytime, she does not remember a bite.

Thanks for your helpon this matter.

B&M

Posts: 65 | From Georgia | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymetoo
Moderator
Member # 743

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymetoo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by B and M:
She actually thinks here entire family has it and she was born with it. We lived in NY for most of our lives. She really could have gotten it anytime, she does not remember a bite.

Could be!! Her immune system is probably very suppressed by many years of Lyme disease. That would make it harder for the antibodies to show up.

--------------------
--Lymetutu--
Opinions, not medical advice!

Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If she is symptomatic, then I hope you find a LLMD to look at test results and make

A diagnosis. She had some specific Lyme bands show up.

I got diagnosed with just band 23 (IgM) and tons of symptoms.

Not via Igenex though. Quest-lucky me. [Smile]

Hugs,

Geneal

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
B and M
Member
Member # 13544

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B and M     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for all of your help. We have an appointment with a Dr. M in MO this week. She is so used to hearing that she has to have a positive test to be treated that she is aprehensive about this appointment.

I try to reassure here that things will be different with a LLMD.

I hope I'm right

Posts: 65 | From Georgia | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
B and M
Member
Member # 13544

Icon 1 posted      Profile for B and M     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for all of your help. We have an appointment with a Dr. M in MO this week. She is so used to hearing that she has to have a positive test to be treated that she is aprehensive about this appointment.

I try to reassure here that things will be different with a LLMD.

I hope I'm right

Posts: 65 | From Georgia | Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
justwondering
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 12813

Icon 1 posted      Profile for justwondering     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
B & M, your wife is blessed to have you. Your concern and love for her will get her through this.

I had undiagnosed Lyme and Babesia and Ehrlich. for 12 years and was just diagnosed due to Igenex testing.

Although I am symptomatic, I have had the infections for so long that my test results would not be considered staggering by any means.

However, I did have positive Lyme bands, especially on the IGM. My doctor said this is typical for long-term infections b/c of immune issues.

Have you thought about testing for co-infections?

I believe due to immune issues, test results can vary from day to day. So don't give up!

Best wishes!

Posts: 209 | From maryland | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
arc35476
Member
Member # 12786

Icon 1 posted      Profile for arc35476     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi B and M

I had a bite last year with the rash and my IGENEX only came back IND 39 and 41++ . I've had all the symptoms as well. I am currently seeing a LLMD and my understanding is that the bands she did test positive for are significant. This disease is so frustrating. I am keeping you in my thoughts and prayers!

Alesia

Posts: 26 | From Tuscaloosa, AL | Registered: Aug 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.