posted
OK, I am on a gluten-free diet and really trying to decide what the best choice is of the two.
Agave nectar only has a glycemic index of 32
Stevia comes in so many forms, and there is a lot of controversy over it right now; many are saying you should only use the leaves and not powder or liquid forms.
I am curious what your opinions are regarding the two and which you prefer, and why?
-------------------- TL Posts: 365 | From OK | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
djf2005
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11449
posted
agave anyday
-------------------- "Experience is not what happens to you; it is what you do with what happens to you."
posted
I think it depends on what you're using it for.
I buy agave to use on pancakes .... my kids like it better than maple syrup, so they end up using it all! It's good right out of the bottle.
Powdered stevia would be good to carry around to put in tea, etc.
-------------------- sixgoofykids.blogspot.com Posts: 13449 | From Ohio | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
bejoy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11129
posted
Both are gluten free. Stevia is best for candida diets. Agave tastes better, and is more satisfying as a sugar or syrup substitute. I'm not familiar with the Stevia controversy either. I use both. Sweets to the sweet.
-------------------- bejoy!
"Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." -Ralph Waldo Emerson Posts: 1918 | From Alive and Well! | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
There was something on the news here recently in regards to some controversy. I found this under the Center for Science of Public Interest:
Stevia: Not Ready For Prime Time
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Three petitions seeking approval of stevia or stevioside as a food additive have been submitted to FDA since 1989 from
(1) a stevia importer in Texas; (2) the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), a trade association; and (3) the Thomas J. Lipton Company. All three petitions were, in effect, rejected because of inadequate data on the safety of stevia and stevioside.
Cargill and Coca-Cola have developed a purified extract of stevia called Truvia. In May 2008, Cargill submitted for publication in the scientific journal Food and Chemical Toxicology a series of studies and reviews which the companies believe establishes the safety of Truvia.
CSPI is reviewing this literature now, as is the Food and Drug Administration.
The FDA has not posted on their Web site any of the documentation from the three petitions. However, the full text of the petition by the AHPA, dated October 21, 1991, is available at an alternative medicine website.
The Scientific Committee on Food for the European Commission concluded that ``there are no satisfactory data to support the safe use of these products [stevia plants and leaves],'' in a five-page opinion dated June 17, 1999. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/dg24/health/sc/scf/out36_en.pdf (requires Adobe Reader plug-in)
The Committee also reiterated ``its earlier opinion that the substance [stevioside] is not acceptable as a sweetener on the presently available data,'' in a seven-page opinion
The Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes for the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food rejected an application for use of stevia as a sweetener in herbal teas because ``the applicant had not provided all of the information necessary to enable an assessment to be made,''
in a three-paragraph statement dated September 24, 1998. The Committee also agreed with concerns raised about the inadequacy of the data on the safety of stevia. http://www.maff.gov.uk/food/novel/980924.htm
World Health Organization
The Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) reviewed stevioside in 1998, but could not quantify an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) because of inadequate data on the composition and safety of stevioside.
The Committee recommended that further studies be done on the metabolism of stevioside in humans and on the potential genetic effects of steviol (a metabolite of stevioside).
The text of their review, published in JECFA Monograph Series 42, is not available on the Internet. A summary table showing no ADI allocated for stevioside is dated June 1998. http://www.who.int/pcs/jecfa/summary_51.htm
-------------------- TL Posts: 365 | From OK | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Riiight...this from the same agencies who approved aspartame and MSG as food additives. The only problem with stevia is that it is not marketed by the big multinationals - otherwise FDA and company would have fast-tracked its approval.
-------------------- Why me? Well, why not me??? Posts: 411 | From San Francisco, CA | Registered: Mar 2007
| IP: Logged |
sizzled
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1357
posted
I use both.
Stevia has been used in Japan for over 20 years, I believe.
Posts: 4258 | From over there | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by chamade: Riiight...this from the same agencies who approved aspartame and MSG as food additives. The only problem with stevia is that it is not marketed by the big multinationals - otherwise FDA and company would have fast-tracked its approval.
Exactly. It's all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Stevia is best for the anti-yeast/candida diet. Agave is 90% fructose.
-------------------- --Lymetutu-- Opinions, not medical advice! Posts: 96222 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |
luvs2ride
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8090
posted
Hogwash on the controversy. Stevia is an herb that is ground up. Not made in a lab therefore can't be patented.
I use both as sweeteners.
Luvs
-------------------- When the Power of Love overcomes the Love of Power, there will be Peace. Posts: 3038 | From america | Registered: Oct 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
agave probably tastes better but if u have candida then it still has a good amount of sugar and you shouldnt use it. I never heard anything bad about stevia. I use it all the time.
posted
Stevia is amazing and as far as I'm concerned the only reason the FDA isn't approving it, is that nobody can make big money off of patenting it.
Posts: 526 | From NJ | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
bejoy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11129
posted
I'm smelling a payoff by the Nutrasweet/ Aspartame company to prevent FDA approval.
-------------------- bejoy!
"Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." -Ralph Waldo Emerson Posts: 1918 | From Alive and Well! | Registered: Feb 2007
| IP: Logged |
As you all probably know, the Feds have been in "cahoots" with big money forever.
Why don't more people acknowledge Lyme Disease?????? I know this board has been there. Tourism=BIG industry. How about the threat of making supplements prescription required?
I love Stevia. Because of it, I can have desserts!!! (Big time Candida). It took some getting used to but now that I am, it's great. You'd be surprised what you can use it in.
Anyway, my 2 cents!
Bug
-------------------- Every experience God gives us, every person He puts in our lives, is the perfect preparation for a future only He can see....Corrie Ten Boom Posts: 343 | From Northcentral Iowa | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic