The Georgia Supreme Court will hear arguments next week in a civil case in which four Hall County physicians were cleared by a jury of negligence in the misdiagnosis of a child with Rocky Mountain spotted fever.
The high court's decision could have a lasting effect on medical malpractice lawsuits in Georgia and whether defendants can be excused for not foreseeing the impact of their acts.
Justices agreed to consider whether Hall County State Court jurors who deliberated the case in 2006 should have been given certain legal instructions regarding hindsight prior to deliberating the case of Justin Smith.
Smith's parents, Clay and Tracie Smith, alleged that physicians Cathryn Finch, Charles Jones, Jeff Elder and Todd Jordan were negligent when they failed to spot the symptoms of the rare tick-borne illness in their child, who was 13 when he was stricken in June 2003. Doctors initially thought Justin Smith suffered from an enterovirus.
The Smiths claimed their son, who testified during the trial, suffered permanent brain damage before he was properly treated at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston, 12 days after first being seen by a pediatric doctor for fever and headaches. An attorney for the Smiths asked a jury to award $3.8 million.
Lawyers for the doctors disputed that the child suffered lasting effects from the illness.
The civil trial lasted two weeks and ended with a jury of 12 clearing all four physicians of any liability. Attorneys for the doctors successfully argued that they showed "reasonable care and skill" in treating the child, and pointed out that Rocky Mountain spotted fever is so seldom seen by doctors that it is difficult to diagnose. In 2002, there were only 84 cases of the illness nationwide among children ages 5 to 14.
The state Supreme Court will consider whether an instruction given by the presiding judge regarding hindsight is an inaccurate or confusing statement of law that should be overturned.
The hindsight jury instruction says in part that "negligence consists of foreseeing and guarding against that which is possible and likely to happen, not against that which is only remotely and slightly possible."
Lawyers for the Smiths say the instruction is in conflict with the legal rule of foreseeablility, in which a person can be held liable "if a defendant might have foreseen some injury would result from his act or omission."
The plaintiffs attorneys also claim that the hindsight instruction, also known as a "jury charge" should only be given if negligence is claimed in a case in which information was not available to the physicians, noting that the doctors knew about the tick bite.
Lawyers for the doctors say a "hallmark rash" that is a sign of Rocky Mountain spotted fever did not surface until Justin Smith was taken to Egleston, and was information not known to them at the time of their diagnosis.
The doctors contend, according to a summary of the appeal from the Georgia Supreme Court, that "the hindsight charge should not be overturned, as it is a common sense concept that cautions a jury against using a retrospective viewpoint to decide whether a physician committed medical malpractice."
David S. Bills, the attorney representing the Smiths, called the jury's 2006 verdict "an unfortunate outcome."
Bills said no other state in the nation has a similar hindsight jury charge, and noted that it is only used in medical malpractice cases, not in product liability suits.
"We are confident that the Georgia Supreme Court will carefully consider this pending issue of medical malpractice law that we believe needs to be changed," Bills said.
Attorneys Weymon Forrester and John Dickerson, who successfully represented the doctors, were unavailable for comment Thursday.
Thank you much for posting this!!! It is very well know that RMSF is prevalent in Geogia from a tick bite!!!!
Unfortunitally, no one mentions any other TBI but so little is known about it in this area. And the few Dr.'s that do catch it and dx it do not report it.
Well back to the subject. I live about an hour and a half from there. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE CAN DO TO SUPPORT THIS FAMILY IN WINNING THIS CASE???????
If you can think or anyone else can think of anything, please PM me and let me know.
Thank you,
Janet
Posts: 351 | From Georgia | Registered: Feb 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
ok, i certainly hope my question below is a stupid one:
the dr. charles jones mentioned in this article is one who practices in hall county ga, correct? (and not our one and only?)
mo
Posts: 8337 | From the other shore | Registered: Jul 2002
| IP: Logged |
hshbmom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9478
posted
Mo, you're right. These men have the similar names, but this is NOT the pediatric Lyme doctor in Connecticut.
Posts: 1672 | From AL/WV/OH | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
Melanie Reber
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 3707
posted
Certainly not a stupid question Miss Maureen. I had to double check as well.
Posts: 7052 | From Colorado | Registered: Mar 2003
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic