Thank you for taking the time to e-mail us. I'm sorry that we have infuriated you. It is not our goal to anger anyone, but rather to make sure that people know that not all physicians and laboratories utilize a scientific approach to the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. For instance, I would want anyone considering diagnosis and treatment similar to that practiced by the individual recently arrested in New Mexico (http://www.kfoxtv.com/news/19784543/detail.html) to investigate the means of diagnosis and consider getting a second opinion.
While I do not know you, I'm please to hear that you are getting better since being diagnosed. I do not wish for anyone to suffer from a lack of treatment resulting from an improper diagnosis.
I appreciate that you took the time to sent us the e-mail and wish you the best of luck in the future.
Ted Green Wright, Green & Baughman, LLC 4959 NE Goodview Circle Lee's Summit, MO 64064 (816) 373-2755 [email protected]
The recipient of this email should be aware that (1) e-mail communication is not a secure method of communication, (2) any e-mail that is sent to you or by you may be copied and held by various computers it passes through as it goes from me to you or vice versa, (3) persons not participating in our communication may intercept our communications by improperly accessing your computer or my computer or even some computer unconnected to either of us which the e-mail passed through. I am communicating to you via e-mail because you have consented to receive communications via this medium. If you change your mind and want future communications to be sent in a different fashion, please let me know AT ONCE. The information contained in this e-mail transmission may be legally privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please call (816) 373-2755.
Neither lymeattorneys.com, nor this communication are intended to create an attorney-client relationship between you and Wright, Green & Baughman, LLC, whose attorneys are licensed in Missouri and Kansas. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements or a website.
On Jun 18, 2009, at 1:25 PM, Linda and Bill wrote:
And what the hell credentials do you have to be an expert on lyme? You're little site infuriates me. I have suffered for 40 yrs before I was ever tested and diagnosed. Finally I am getting somewhere at 58 yrs old.
I'd like to sue YOU!!!!
Posts: 847 | From upstateNY | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
I never expected to get a reply to my little 3 sentence lyme rage. It seems to my litle lyme brain they changed their tune alittle, or is it just my imagination?
Posts: 847 | From upstateNY | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
linda, what a note you wrote and that they REPLIED back civil !! unbelievable.
he does bring up the good point about this one dr. shown in link...
thanks for posting this!!
may i suggest you copy your reply and paste it to the actual post that discussed this for a good followup where folks were giving their opinions.
nothing's better than as paul harvey would say, "now here's the rest of the story!" lol
IP: Logged |
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524
posted
I think we should all sue our doctors who have
failed to diagnose upon visits for over a year. And
those who did test for Lyme but were neg. then
later found positive by a LLLab. All proceeds go to
charity and science. What do ya say?
-------------------- Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND IgM neg pos 31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 + DX:Neuroborreliosis Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good try, but these are sharks in the water and do not have any real interest in justice or your welfare, or anyone else except themselves and their wallets.
The doctor they are now going after has been helping a lot of people just like you, and those folks are going to be hurt by their action. The lab they went after in FL was absolutely professional, was helping people find babesia when no one else would. They helped me finally get a diagnosis, saw the ring stage of the parasite. This cannot be faked. So the state of FL decided (probably encouraged by the CDC) that diagnosing tickborne diseases was not a good thing, in fact bad for their stats. So they shut it down. The CDC was behind the attempts to shut down another highly professional specialty lab. Anyone who is in the forefront of tickborne disease diagnosis is in a precarious position.
So, that baloney about preventing patients from being treated for a disease they don't have is just cover for greed. Not very good cover either.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
Keebler
Honored Contributor (25K+ posts)
Member # 12673
posted
-
I'm not saying that unscrupulous treatments should continue but as patients become more educated in research methods, those will soon see a short shelf life.
However, by the law firm advertising in such a manner, it is clear that they are fishing for anyone who is lawsuit happy with dollar signs in their eyes and they are going after some good doctors who have the courage to address a complex set of tick-borne infections.
The are not just the ambulance chaser here, they are tossing debris and bait in the road.
-
[ 06-20-2009, 02:21 PM: Message edited by: Keebler ]
Posts: 48021 | From Tree House | Registered: Jul 2007
| IP: Logged |
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524
posted
Well- What does one suggest?
I have compiled enough information I could
represent myself in a court of law. Unfortunately
the docs who are treating don't have that luxury
I know getting a good lawyer is like
trying to get a good doctor! In the Fl. case the
defense needed was deceased.
-------------------- Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND IgM neg pos 31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 + DX:Neuroborreliosis Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic