LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » My kid's IgeneX results... I need help

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: My kid's IgeneX results... I need help
IckyTicky
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21466

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IckyTicky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I should be a pro at this already but I'm still confused. I know there is a page here with specifics about results but I still don't understand something.

I am CDC +, my 16 yr old is CDC+, My 6 yr old is CDC+. My husband is positive but not CDC + and today I found out for sure that my 8yr old is positive... but only IgeneX positive on IGG.

How can she be only positive by IgeneX on IGG when she is having neuro symptoms? She has not had abx in a long time. But a few years ago she had to be on low dose macrodantin due to a bladder reflux condition. Could that have skewed the results?

Here are the results. Please tell me what you think.
IGM: 41 IND
IGG:
31 IND
34 IND
39+
58+
41+++

--------------------
IGM: 18+, 23+, 30+, 31+++, 34+, 39IND, 41++, 58+++, 66+, 83-93IND
IGG: 31+, 39IND, 41+
Also positive for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae and RMSF.
Whole family of 5 dx with Lyme.

Posts: 1014 | From Texas | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Geneal
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10375

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Geneal     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
CDC doesn't count bands 31 and 34.

I would consider your 8 year old positive.

Hugs,

Geneal

Posts: 6250 | From Louisiana | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Has she had any recent bites?

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
IckyTicky
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21466

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IckyTicky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No.. she has never had a tick bite that I'm aware of. Neither has my 6 yr old and he is CDC+.

--------------------
IGM: 18+, 23+, 30+, 31+++, 34+, 39IND, 41++, 58+++, 66+, 83-93IND
IGG: 31+, 39IND, 41+
Also positive for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae and RMSF.
Whole family of 5 dx with Lyme.

Posts: 1014 | From Texas | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Need Lots of Help
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 18603

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Need Lots of Help     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I would treat. My daughter isn't CDC positive, but she is Igenex positive. I am treating. I am not taking any chances, but that is just me. My daughter is 6.

Shalome

Posts: 893 | From Florida | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
julielynne4
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Just remember that it is possible to have a tick bite and have no idea - a tick can be the size of a period at the end of a sentence....there's just no way unless there is a distinct rash - if you think about all the nooks and crannies in our body where they can dig in...
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JamesNYC
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15793

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JamesNYC     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What difference does it make? She's infected, get her treatment.

She's positive enough. IGG means that it's an older infection. And you should be doing a lot more research and self education on lyme since your whole family has it.

You should know by now the tests are barely meaningful. They can only confirm an infection, and won't necessarily exclude.

The CDC criteria is for epidemiological study not for diagnosis. But you should know that by now.

Please get the kid treated.

James

Posts: 872 | From New York City | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You are right James it does not matter a pos. is pos.

Her question was -

How can she be only positive by IgeneX on IGG when she is having neuro symptoms? She has not

had abx in a long time. But a few years ago she had to be on low dose macrodantin due to a

bladder reflux condition. Could that have skewed the results?


The latest research says IgG is recent and IgM is long standing over a year.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JamesNYC
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15793

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JamesNYC     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pinelady,

I believe you are mistaken.

This is from Dr. C's WB explanation:

"With most infections, your immune system first forms IgM antibodies, then in about 2 to 4 weeks, you see IgG antibodies. In some infections, IgG antibodies may be detectable for years.

Because Borrelia burgdorferi is a chronic persistent infection that may last for decades, you would think patients with chronic symptoms would have positive IgG Western blots.

But actually, more IgM blots are positive in chronic borreliosis than IgG. Every time Borrelia burgdorferi reproduces itself, it may stimulate the immune system to form new IgM antibodies."


However, what I think it really says is that either can be positive at any time.

James

Posts: 872 | From New York City | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
IckyTicky
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21466

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IckyTicky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks for the admonishment James.
I've known for a little over a year that I have lyme, and I do research EVERY freaking day.
That does not mean I can retain all the information or understand it all.
I'm doing the best I can.
I never said I wouldn't treat...

geeze.. teach me to ask a question.

--------------------
IGM: 18+, 23+, 30+, 31+++, 34+, 39IND, 41++, 58+++, 66+, 83-93IND
IGG: 31+, 39IND, 41+
Also positive for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae and RMSF.
Whole family of 5 dx with Lyme.

Posts: 1014 | From Texas | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
IckyTicky
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21466

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IckyTicky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pinelady.. what I was hoping was that her results would come out def. + since she was on low dose Macrodantin for almost a full year when she was 5 (so I guess it's been 3 years.)

Wouldn't more antibodies have shown up from her being on abx for a year? Even though she hasn't been on any recently?

I know that pos. is pos. but when it is CDC + it greatly helps getting insurance to cover.

Treating a whole family of 5 and all the LLMD expenses ... we won't last long if insurance doesn't cover some.

--------------------
IGM: 18+, 23+, 30+, 31+++, 34+, 39IND, 41++, 58+++, 66+, 83-93IND
IGG: 31+, 39IND, 41+
Also positive for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae and RMSF.
Whole family of 5 dx with Lyme.

Posts: 1014 | From Texas | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
JamesNYC
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 15793

Icon 1 posted      Profile for JamesNYC     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I apologize Icky,

I think I misread your post. I THOUGHT you were asking whether or not to treat. But maybe you were just asking about the test?

I didn't mean to sound too, well, mean.

So, the way I was interpreting your post, naturally I became alarmed thinking you were considering not treating your child.

So, again, I'm sorry for misinterpreting your post.

James

Posts: 872 | From New York City | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
IckyTicky
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21466

Icon 1 posted      Profile for IckyTicky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thanks James. Apology accepted.
I have every intention to treat my child, just like my other two are being treated.

Sorry for being ugly [Smile] I can see where you could have misunderstood.

--------------------
IGM: 18+, 23+, 30+, 31+++, 34+, 39IND, 41++, 58+++, 66+, 83-93IND
IGG: 31+, 39IND, 41+
Also positive for Mycoplasma Pneumoniae and RMSF.
Whole family of 5 dx with Lyme.

Posts: 1014 | From Texas | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hides1
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6348

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hides1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
My one son got diagnosed by Dr. J when he was five. WE truly beleive he contracted it from me during the birthing of breastfeeding processes. He had nuero symptoms too with sleep and personlaity issues. His first test through Igenex was CDC positive on the WB IGG. He has been in treatement for almost 4 years now since he had many of the coinfections. During this time every 4 months he has tests. Sometimes he does get a CDC positive WB IGM and then it changes. It all has to do how the bacteria cycles int he body and how your body looks at it int erms of new or old antibodies. NEw bands may light up because one month you had a response to one and another you didn't.

Make sure you get all your kids tested for all the coinfections, treat aggressively and never give up. Timmy is doing very well now- he is a great athlete and gets perfect report cards. He is still showing some positives so we are still treating but we know there has been great STRIVES with him during the past 4 years. I would hate to think of what he would be like now if I never went to Dr. J.

Posts: 238 | From Bethlehem, PA | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tick battler
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 21113

Icon 1 posted      Profile for tick battler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ickyticky-

Sorry you are dealing with this too. My entire family of 5 is infected.

My twin boys are 5 and my daughter is almost 3. They have been in treatment about a year under Dr. J in CT. They are being treated very aggressively and improving. 2 abx plus mepron plus artemisinin!

Only one of them had a positive Igenex when we started treatment. Then another turned positive during treatment.

I would not put too much emphasis on the IGG vs. IGM. When I used to ask Dr. J about this, he would say it didn't matter. He said one time that the IGM (which shows more recent exposure) can be from an infection 6 months ago.

To me, it makes sense that your 8 year old has a positive IGG rather than IGM since if she has neuro symptoms, that would indicate an older infection. Not sure if that interpretation is correct, but that's how I understand it.

The fact that your 8 year old has SYMPTOMS plus the positive bands specific to lyme (IGG or IGM)is enough I believe to make a lyme diagnosis.

BUT if your 8 year old did not have symptoms, and had an IGG, Dr. J would probably not treat, as he told me he often tests entire families since the parents want all children tested after one is ill.

Often they all test positive but the ones without symptoms remain healthy without treatment. This would mean that they had been exposed to lyme, but somehow their bodies fought it off.

tickbattler

Posts: 1763 | From Malvern, PA | Registered: Jul 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But (actually), more IgM blots are positive in

chronic borreliosis than IgG. Every time Borrelia

burgdorferi reproduces itself, it (may)

stimulate the immune system to form new IgM

antibodies.

Here are the results. Please tell me what you think.
IGM: 41 IND
IGG:
31 IND
34 IND
39+
58+
41+++

She has not had abx in a long time.
--------------------------------------------------
Your right James I was wrong. I guess this is why

most of us who get no response or,

IgG and IgM negative,

turn IgM only, positive after a challenge.

My first test I had one band in IgG.

After 2 years and a challenge I got IgM Pos.

IgG neg. But I was still sick for over 2 years.

So this is the conundrum for me.

Was this old signs of long gone infection?
Was this a new infection?
Was this a hidden infection that has just resurfaced as a new ongoing inflammation,as it does in syphilis?

I don't know.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Need Lots of Help
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 18603

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Need Lots of Help     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have had lyme for what I think to be 20 years.

I have positive IGG bands, but not enough to be CDC positive.

I am CDC positive IGM.......and I know I didn't get bit recently (within 6 months). Things that make you go HUM....

But, IckyTicky I think that lyme attacks each individual differently. Even though I gave my daughter lyme, she has slightly different symptoms than I do. Her father also has lyme. He is from up north, and I think a different strand of lyme. He is more Nuero, I am more arthritic.

She is a mixture of me and her father. Also, she has some of my Bands present on her WB and some of her fathers bands present, it is strange.

Good luck to you and your family...it does suck we the whole family is sick, I know.

Shalome

Posts: 893 | From Florida | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think you guys are special Need Lots of Help. That may be a key.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Evolutionary variance. This may explain it.

Thanks Rick at Lymeinfo at Yahoo Groups as always.

http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122577112/abstract

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.