tickled1
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 14257
posted
Lymetoo,
I thought it said that those who get the regular seasonal flu shot without getting the H1N1 shot were at increased risk of getting swine flu???? I read it awhile ago though and didn't go back to check if I had that right.
Posts: 2541 | From Northeast | Registered: Jan 2008
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND IgM neg pos 31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 + DX:Neuroborreliosis Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008
| IP: Logged |
I thought it said that those who get the regular seasonal flu shot without getting the H1N1 shot were at increased risk of getting swine flu???? I read it awhile ago though and didn't go back to check if I had that right.
You could be right!
-------------------- --Lymetutu-- Opinions, not medical advice! Posts: 96239 | From Texas | Registered: Feb 2001
| IP: Logged |
lymie_in_md
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 14197
posted
I don't think reactions to vaccines are 1+1=2. In other words vaccines lower your immune system. It doesn't mean a negative vaccine reaction is getting the flu. It could mean you have reaction any reaction. Some reactions are worse then the flu, like the Washington Redskin's cheerleader hopeful who got estonia. Reactions are not a simple case of specific conditions. The vaccine can effect so many bodily functions, your putting poisons into your muscle, like, mercury, aluminum, squalene. You could look up any of these and the number of symptoms they can cause is as varied as lyme.
The sad part, you put a vaccine into your body and it is like a land mind. Just needs something to trigger a reaction. The land mind could go inert for decades. Or you could have a reaction within weeks of having a vaccine. If your immune system is compromised already, it is more likely sooner then later.
-------------------- Bob Posts: 2150 | From Maryland | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
Brussels
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 13480
posted
Tutu, I think it was not the H1N1 jab.
I read the Canadian article you mention and it was the other regular flu shot. People who were vaccinated with the seasonal flu shots would have more risk to die in case they get the H1N1 infection than non/vaccinated people.
About the H1N1 shot, it seems that the rate of people that get immunity after the H1N1 jabs vary depending on the brand of vaccine you are taking.
But immunity conferred is in any case, very low, about 50% at its maximum but mostly less, depending on group age. This is information from the vaccine makers themselves!!!
So it means that you get the mercury, the chicken embryo or monkey parts, formaldehyde, detergents, anti freeze injections plus some half dead viruses all present in the flu jabs and still can only get a MAXIMUM of 50% immunization that is short lived!!!!
The average seems to be close to 1 in 4 getting immunity to 3 in 4 NOT getting immunity after the vaccination!!
It seems that without a booster, the immunization effect will wean rather fast.
Many too many people in this forum report that after getting the regular flu shot, they fell sick and many never got back to their previous health before the jab.
I don't see any health benefit in taking these flu shots. Possibly, if the rate of immunity conferred was close to 100%, who knows. But being so low, and carrying so many unknown risks, I see no reason to take the jabs. No matter which. The risks are all written in the flu shot insert!
Vaccine makers write about the several side effects and risks, you just have to open the package and read.
Posts: 6200 | From Brussels | Registered: Oct 2007
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/