SForsgren
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7686
posted
Amen! Good stuff.
-------------------- Be well, Scott Posts: 4617 | From San Jose, CA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
Truthfinder
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8512
posted
I'm so glad someone posted this.
What I don't quite understand is how any person or business entity can 'patent' a certain frequency.
Patents are issued for products or processes that are 'unique' or 'novel'. So, I'm having trouble understanding this patent issue.
Anyone understand this?
-------------------- Tracy .... Prayers for the Lyme Community - every day at 6 p.m. Pacific Time and 9 p.m. Eastern Time � just take a few moments to say a prayer wherever you are�. Posts: 2966 | From Colorado | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
djf2005
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 11449
posted
great interview
-------------------- "Experience is not what happens to you; it is what you do with what happens to you."
-------------------- Bart and Babesia seropositive Current tx: Rifampin, Biaxin, Bactrim DS, Artemisinin, Resveratrol (japanese knotweed), Red Root, Boneset Posts: 168 | From PA | Registered: Feb 2010
| IP: Logged |
Truthfinder
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8512
posted
Probably true, massman. And it seems like when Big Medicine gets hold of a patent, it turns whatever could be cheap into somethng expensive.
Strange. This isn't the original article that Mercola put out... the original article I saw about a week ago specifically mentioned cancer. This article says nothing about cancer except in the title. And I can't seem to turn up the other article.
In any case, I've been unable to turn up anything about patenting actual frequencies on the Web.
-------------------- Tracy .... Prayers for the Lyme Community - every day at 6 p.m. Pacific Time and 9 p.m. Eastern Time � just take a few moments to say a prayer wherever you are�. Posts: 2966 | From Colorado | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
massman
Unregistered
posted
Tracy - did you listen to the entire interview ?
If I recall correctly the interview is about an hour long. When it looks like it is rewinding another segment is coming up.
IP: Logged |
Truthfinder
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 8512
posted
No, I have dial-up and it just takes too long to buffer online videos. I gave up trying except realy short ones less than a minute or so.
-------------------- Tracy .... Prayers for the Lyme Community - every day at 6 p.m. Pacific Time and 9 p.m. Eastern Time � just take a few moments to say a prayer wherever you are�. Posts: 2966 | From Colorado | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
canefan17
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 22149
posted
What are they discussing in Part 4 of 7?
Bionics?
Posts: 5394 | From Houston, Tx | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
canefan17
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 22149
posted
So who here takes Core Minerals?
Posts: 5394 | From Houston, Tx | Registered: Aug 2009
| IP: Logged |
map1131
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2022
posted
Wow, hearing stuff like this gives me hope....change is coming. Ssssslllloooowwwllllly
Pam
-------------------- "Never, never, never, never, never give up" Winston Churchill Posts: 6478 | From Louisville, Ky | Registered: Jan 2002
| IP: Logged |
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397
posted
re: Patents are issued for products or processes that are 'unique' or 'novel'. So, I'm having trouble understanding this patent issue.
Anyone understand this?
-
I guess it would depend on how the frequencies were applied to the body...? Are they applied through a Rife type device, lasers, audio, some proprietary device...?
----
re: And it seems like when Big Medicine gets hold of a patent, it turns whatever could be cheap into somethng expensive.
-
Alternative doctors aren't exactly cheap, either...
----
All of this is great but it's hard to say how long it will be before it's readily available at a reasonable cost.
Professor Lai's work on magnetic fields & malaria came out about 10 years ago. This is not new research. One would think by now that malaria would be a thing of the past but it's not.
What's the hold up? Has there been new research since then? Has this technology been proven or disproven? I always read - "Although initially promising, -----(fill in the blank) says more research is needed."
I've seen this hundreds of times about "promising" "new" treatments that seem like things rehashed from Rife or Tesla from back in 1920.
I have seen many studies that an inexpensive Chinese combo drug derived from artemesia is 96% effective for "curing" malaria. I searched everywhere & it is not available in the US.
There are forces manipulating what is available to us. They have decoded the human genome & created artificial life but we still can't get accurate tests for Lyme & the co-infections...
I wish I could be more enthusiastic about this. Dr K may be cutting edge but the rest of the medical world is back in Dark Ages. They can't even come up with some sort of basic health coverage for citizens of this country.
Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[loco]](graemlins/loco.gif)
![[woohoo]](graemlins/woohoo.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic