LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Columbia University Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Columbia University Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center
Ian
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 24637

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ian     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am considering trying to become a patient of the Columbia University Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center. The Center was founded, in part, by support from the Lyme Disease Association.

http://columbia-lyme.org/index.html

The info on the site suggests that the Center is fairly progressive on Lyme. It certainly recognizes chronic Lyme, recognizes the pitfalls of current diagnostic guidelines, and supports IV antibiotic treatment. Then again, a few of the blurbs seem like the Center might compromise with IDSA, the CDC, and insurance companies on some issues.

For example, when deciding on when to stop antibiotics the Center states, "Most valuable would be to use objective markers to measure change in response to treatment, such as neuropsychological testing or neuroimaging before and after the repeated course of treatment. The use of these objective tests allows the clinician to determine whether physiological and cognitive changes occurred, and it allows insurance companies who pay for the treatment to see that their investment was worthwhile."

Then again, participants in their research studies are diagnosed and treated free of charge. Does anyone know anything about the Columbia University Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center? It certainly seems much more progressive on Lyme than any other university in the US. Is it a good option for treatment?

--------------------
Bart and Babesia seropositive
Current tx: Rifampin, Biaxin, Bactrim DS, Artemisinin, Resveratrol (japanese knotweed), Red Root, Boneset

Posts: 168 | From PA | Registered: Feb 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
DaveNJ
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 17362

Icon 1 posted      Profile for DaveNJ     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ian,

it's my understanding that it is a reseacrh facilty not a treatment center. The only way to get treatment there is to be selected for a study. That aside these folks are leading the way as far as research and being advocates.

Dave

--------------------
On my journey to wellness - One day at a time.

Posts: 989 | From NJ | Registered: Sep 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
seekhelp
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 15067

Icon 1 posted      Profile for seekhelp     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lots of info on this center if you do a search.

TinCup I believe said run, run run..

Posts: 7545 | From The 5th Dimension - The Twilight Zone | Registered: Mar 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.columbia-lyme.org/research/cr_research.html

Personally I think it is wrong to commit to a study as a control.

Luke: All right..., I'll give it a try. Yoda: No. Try not. Do... or do not. There is no try.

I sorta feel that way when it comes to my brain and life.

But there are a lot of reports due-I guess the proof will be in the pudding.
==================================================
Given the significant risk and the lack of sustained benefit, Dr. Fallon and his co-authors recommended against the use of a course of 10 weeks of IV ceftriaxone followed by 14 weeks of no antibiotics as a treatment strategy for a sustained improvement in cognition.

The acute and sustained antibiotic-associated improvement in pain and physical functioning among subgroups of patients with greater severity of symptoms was notable as these are among the most disabling symptoms experienced by patients;

however, because these were secondary and not primary outcome measures, conclusions regarding the benefit of repeated IV therapy for this set of symptoms must await further investigation.

This NIH-funded study was published in Neurology on-line in October 2007 and in the journal itself in March 2008.

http://www.columbia-lyme.org/research/featured_research.html

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WildCondor
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They do studies but you have a 50% chance of getting no treatment. They focus on brain SPECT scans and research there, not treatment.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lightparfait
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 22022

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lightparfait     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have been involved in studies there. I have not been treated there. I also jwas hoping to initially, but found LLMD treatment easier and very effective. Best to go to a LLMD unless you live nearby like me and can participate easily.
Local NY/NJ LLMD"s send their patients there for spect scans, etc.

Posts: 1009 | From NJ | Registered: Aug 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ian
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 24637

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ian     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you all for your advice as always. I will stick solely to my LLMD. If he recommends that I go there for scans then I will. I am sure that treatment will be more aggressive with my LLMD, and I am confident putting myself into his capable hands.

I met with another LLMD who has a vast amount of experience with Lyme. She only does diagnostic work. She diagnosed me with chronic neuroborreliosis and told me that I likely have encephalitis and/or cerebral vasculitis. That diagnosis raised my urgency, and I have secured an appointment with my LLMD for this week.

I'm trying to get treatment as soon as possible. I'll let you guys know as soon as I start treatment and how it goes. In advance, thanks to you all for all your advice and support.

--------------------
Bart and Babesia seropositive
Current tx: Rifampin, Biaxin, Bactrim DS, Artemisinin, Resveratrol (japanese knotweed), Red Root, Boneset

Posts: 168 | From PA | Registered: Feb 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
chopper
Member
Member # 24841

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chopper     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I saw Dr. F who is involved in the Columbia Lyme Research center in his private NYC office.Believe he also has an office in Connecticut somewhere. From what I understand he does not necessarily treat patients unless they are accepted in a study. He did however review my med records and give a written recommendation to my local doctor. Cost me $300 out of pocket for this though as he is not a participating doctor in my insurance plan. I can't participate in any of the studies as I have severe/progound hearing loss and the study researchers concluded this would skew the studies and maybe make the results invalid. I think DaveNJ is correct the center does research not treatment.
Posts: 35 | From Reading, Pennsylvania | Registered: Mar 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sickpuppy
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 23846

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sickpuppy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I looked into this. I think Hoosiers51 (hope I got the name right) went there.
As far as getting the evaluation they offer--it costs a fortune-- and then they are not a treatment facility.
There were no research studies available at the time.
They are very focused on the SPECT and neurocognitive assessment.

Posts: 702 | From North Eastern USA | Registered: Dec 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.