LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » I have Posiotive SM-RNP for LUPUS

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: I have Posiotive SM-RNP for LUPUS
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I knew I never had Lyme at ALL. I was set up for IV treatment aTODAY but at the LAST minute the doctor who ordered the tests faxed it to my doc who had ordered the IV treatment. OH GOD HELP
Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kelly5907
Member
Member # 13734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Kelly5907     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
okay...calm down and tell me your test results..lets start there....you will be okay honey just hold on!!!!!!
positive thoughts.....
"your mind guides your body and your body will follow your thoughts"

Posts: 28 | From Long Island | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kelly5907
Member
Member # 13734

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Kelly5907     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
also remember that lyme can mimick lupus and vice versa...thee disease can intermingle the blood results...so do not panick!!
Posts: 28 | From Long Island | Registered: Nov 2007  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
kelly, this SM anti-RNP is sen in Lupus or MTCD, I doubt Lyme can due this.
Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GiGi
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 259

Icon 1 posted      Profile for GiGi         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gisells, when we were at doctorofhope.com clinic down south for treatment of Lyme and Lyme/Parkinson, I asked many, many questions of everyone there. I was told that Lupus is also treated there successfully. We know for certain from Stac, myself & husband, MariMi and a bunch of others I talked to before we went south, that the treatment (both natural antibacterial and natural

antiviral) is very effective for Lyme, and it works for many different ailments. Most patients that visit that clinic don't know for certain what kind of disease they really have anyway. There are so many mutations of bacteria and viruses and the more and the longer the drugs are taken, the more mutations. They are a lot smarter than we.
Please explore that website a little - read the whole site especially all different diseases. Feel free to e-mail me and I am sure everyone that has been down there will be willing to tell you what they learned.


Posts: 9834 | From Washington State | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Tincup
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 5829

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Tincup         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have looked at over 90 sites today and copied this for your information. I learned 2 things while researching.

1. Rhumies are not even taught about Lyme. It is only refered to as "other infectious diseases" in most of the literature and even in the training courses provided to them.

2. Positive anti-SM and anti-RNP are... AT BEST...ONLY... AT BEST... 60% reliable in diagnosing Lupus.

Here are a few "snips" I thought might be of interest. It may give you a resource to use to base questions on for the doc that cut off your antibiotics today. Again, I do not know if you have Lyme or Lupus. Just trying to shed some light.

Diagnosing Lupus

No single test can determine whether a person has lupus, but several laboratory tests may
help the doctor to make a diagnosis. The most useful tests identify certain blood
autoantibodies often present in people with lupus. For example, the antinuclear antibody
(ANA) test is commonly used to look for autoantibodies that react against components of
the nucleus, or "command center," of the patient's own cells. Many people with lupus test
positive for ANA; however, some drugs, infections, and other diseases also can cause a
positive result. The ANA test simply provides another clue for the doctor to consider in
making a diagnosis. There are also blood tests for individual types of autoantibodies that
are more specific to people with lupus, although not all people with lupus test positive
for these. These antibodies include anti-DNA, anti-Sm, anti-RNP, anti-Ro (SSA), and
anti-La (SSB). The doctor may use these antibody tests to help make a diagnosis of lupus.
Some tests are used less frequently but may be helpful if the cause of a person's
symptoms remains unclear. The doctor may order a biopsy of the skin or kidneys if those
body systems are affected. Some doctors may order a syphilis test because some lupus
antibodies in the blood may cause the test to be falsely positive. A positive test does not
mean that a patient has syphilis. Again, all these tests merely serve as tools to give the
doctor clues and information in making a diagnosis. The doctor will look at the entire
picture - medical history, symptoms, and test results - to determine if a person has lupus.
Other laboratory tests are used to monitor the progress of the disease once it has been
diagnosed. A complete blood count (CBC), urinalysis, blood chemistries, and erythrocyte
sedimentation rate (ESR) test can provide valuable information. (The ESR is a measure
of inflammation in the body. It tests how quickly red blood cells drop to the bottom of a
tube of unclotted blood.) Another common test measures the blood level of a group of
proteins called complement. People with lupus often have low complement levels,
especially during flares of the disease.

AND:
(I see a babesia/lyme pattern forming here. Have you been tested at a good lab like Igenex for Babesia?)

Antimalarials are another type of drug commonly used to treat lupus. These drugs were
originally used to treat the symptoms of malaria, but doctors have found that they also are
useful treatments for lupus. Exactly how antimalarials work in lupus is unclear, but
scientists think that they may work by suppressing parts of the immune response. Specific
antimalarials used to treat lupus include hydrochloroquine (Plaquenil), chloroquine
(Aralen), and quinacrine (Atabrine). They may be used alone or in combination with
other drugs and generally are used to treat fatigue, joint pain, skin rashes, and
inflammation of the lungs. Research doctors have found that continuous treatment with
antimalarials may prevent flares from recurring. Side effects of antimalarials can include
stomach upset and, extremely rarely, damage to the retina of the eye.

AND:

Anti-RNP
1. RNP abbreviation for ribonucleoprotein, the antigen that this antibody is directed
against
2. Anti-RNP associated with Mixed Connective Tissue Disease (MCTD)
3. Can be seen in SLE and other diseases

AND:
C. Hypocomplementemia
1. Congenital deficiencies
2. Severe malnutrition
3. Severe hepatic failure
4. SLE
5. Extra-articular RA
6. Vasculitis
7. Endocarditis
8. Infections
a. bacterial
b. viral
c. parasitic
9. Glomerulonephritis


AND:

1. HLA-B27
a. Reiter's
b. Ankylosing spondylitis
2. HLA-DR4
a. Rheumatoid arthritis
b. Sjogren's syndrome
c. Giant Cell Arteritis
d. Lyme arthritis
3. HLA-DR3
a. SLE
b. Dermatomyositis
c. CREST
4. a. HLA-B8
b. Myasthenia Gravis
c. Grave's disease
d. Chronic active hepatitis
5. HLA-A3
a. Multiple sclerosis
b. Hemochromatosis

***IMPORTANT****
Patient Study/ Medical: Had Lyme positive titers and positive for Lupus. Not fully
treated for Lyme.
http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/lup/v9n1/pdf/2300818a.pdf

AND:

Lupus patients make many other weird antibodies. (You will learn how and when to test
for these sometime.) For example, they tend to develop false-positive syphilis tests (*
"biologic false positives", BFP's). (AHHHH>>>>could it be Lyme????)


AND:

Kidney: ("The kidney is never normal in ANA-positive systemic lupus.")

Blood:
Patients with lupus have increased total serum gamma globulins ("polyclonal
gammopathy"; a lab test result).
Patients with "lupus anticoagulant" tend to have paradoxical thrombosis rather than
hemorrhage (Arch. Int. Med. 144: 510, 1985; Arch. Path. Lab. Med. 109: 946, 1985).
This was a subject for intensive investigation in the late 1980's. Related to --
but not identical with -- lupus anticoagulant are anticardiolipin antibodies that
cause spontaneous abortion (thrombosis and infarction of the placenta, or
more plausibly, improper implantation Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 90: 6464, 1993)
& thrombosis and are present in of patients with lupus. Both are related to
false-positive tests for syphilis.
And lupus patients can develop a bleeding tendency due to antibodies against
clotting factors (especially factor VIII), thrombocytopenia, and/or vasculitis.


AND:
Most lupus patients have anti-native (i.e., anti-double stranded) DNA, and this antibody
is unusual except in lupus patents. These usually also react with some ribonucleoproteins,
which may drive their production (J. Clin. Invest. 93: 443, 1994).
The few that don't have anti-native DNA will usually have anti-Ro/SSA (not specific for
lupus), or anti-Sm ("Smith" antigen, a nuclear RNP, specific for lupus, though present in
only 30%).
***Remember that many healthy people have low titers of anti-nuclear antibodies.***

AND: (NOTICE THE BUTTERFLY RASH...YOU HAVE NEVER MENTIONED YOU HAVE ONE) (also...ALL of these symptoms are found in Lyme!)

Table-5: 1982 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus

Criterion: Definition:
1. Malar rash Fixed erythema, flat or raised, over the malar eminences, tending to spare
the nasolabial folds
2. Discoid rash Erythematous raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and
follicular plugging; atrophic scarring may occur in older lesions
3. Photosensitivity Skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, by patient
history or physician observation
4. Oral ulcers Oral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by a
physician
5. Arthritis Nonerosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints, characterized
by tenderness, swelling, or effusion
6. Serositis Pleuritis - convincing history or pleuritic pain or rub heard by a physician
or evidence of pleural effusion, or
Pericarditis - documented by ECG or rub or evidence of pericardial effusion
7. Renal disorder Persistent proteinuria greater than 0.5 grams per day or greater
than 3+ if quantitation not performed, or
Cellular casts - may be red cell, hemoglobin, granular, tubular, or mixed
8. Neurologic disorder Seizures - in the absence of offending drugs or known
metabolic derangements, e.g., uremia, ketoacidosis, or electrolyte imbalance, or
Psychosis - in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic derangements, e.g.,
uremia, ketoacidosis, or electrolyte imbalance
9. Hematologic disorder Hemolytic anemia - with reticulocytosis, or
Leukopenia - less than 4,000/mm^3 (4.0x10^9/L) on two or more occasions, or
Lymphopenia - less than 1,500/mm^3 (1.5x10^9/L) on two or more occasions, or
Thrombocytopenia - less than 100,000/mm^3 (100x10^9/L) in the absence of
offending drugs
10. Immunologic disorder Positive LE cell preparation, or
Anti-DNA: antibody to native DNA in abnormal titer, or
Anti-Sm: presence of antibody to Sm nuclear antigen, or
False positive serologic test for syphilis known to be positive for at least 6 months
and confirmed by Treponema pallidum immobilization or fluorescent treponemal
antibody absorption test
11. Antinuclear antibody An abnormal titer of antinuclear antibody by
immunofluorescence or an equivalent assay at any point in time and in the absence of
drugs known to be associated with "drug-induced lupus" syndrome

The proposed classification is based on 11 criteria. For the purpose of identifying patients
in clinical studies, a person shall be said to have systemic lupus erythematosus if any 4 or
more of the 11 criteria are present, serially or simultaneously, during any interval of
observation. ( From: Tan, E.M., Cohen, A.S., Fries, J.F., et al. The 1982 revised criteria
for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Arthritis Rheum. 25:
1271-1277, 1982)
Etiology and Pathogenesis. The cause of SLE is unknown. The presence of multiple
autoantibodies and other immunologic abnormalities (decreased suppressor T-cell
function, spontaneous B-cell activation, impaired macrophage function) point to basic
defects in immunoregulatory controls that normally maintain self tolerance.
Contributory factors may be genetic, hormonal, or environmental in nature. Genetic
influence is suggested by family clusters of SLE, significant (approx. 25%) concordance
of SLE in homozygous twins, and associations with HLA (DR2, DR3) and with inherited
C' deficiencies. (Genetic studies of animal models indicate that multiple genes are
involved in SLE-like disease expression). Hormonal influence is suggested by the 9:1
female:male ratio of SLE, the predilection for females during the reproductive years, and
the frequency of onset in the early postpartum period. (In laboratory animal models,
estrogens increase and androgens decrease the incidence of SLE-like disease).
Environmental factors are indicated by drug-induced (iatrogenic) lupus syndromes
caused by procainamide, hydralazine, and other drugs, and by skin sensitivity to sunlight
exposure which may provoke the onset of SLE. The possible etiologic role of a specific
infectious agent is speculative at this time.
Immunological Aspects of SLE. The discovery in 1948 of the "LE cell" was a major
advance in diagnosis and led to the recognition that SLE and related CTDs are associated
with the presence of antinuclear autoantibodies (ANAs) (see Table-6). ANAs are a
generic group of serum, mainly IgG, antibodies which react by indirect
immunoflurescence test with acetone-fixed cell nuclei from a wide range of tissues and
animal species (thus ANAs lack tissue and species specificity).


AND:
ANA stands for Antinuclear Antibody. This literally means 'substance against the cell
nucleus'. The nucleus is the 'headquarters' of the living cell, therefore the ANA can
damage or destroy cells & tissues.
95%-98% of patients with SLE will have a positive ANA test, but the majority of people
with a positive ANA test do not have SLE. A positive ANA test can be found in many
conditions, including Sjogren's Syndrome, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, & mixed
connective tissue disease. Many normal healthy people will also have a positive ANA
test. Therefore a positive ANA test, on it's own, does not mean that person has lupus.
Because of this, the physician has to look very carefully at the titer (number) & pattern of
the ANA test. The titer shows how many times the technician had to mix fluid from the
patient's blood to get a sample free of ANAs. Thus a titer of 1:640 shows a greater
concentration of ANA than 1:320 or 1:160, since it took 640 dilutions of the plasma
before ANA was no longer detected. The apparent great difference between various
titers can be misleading. Since each dilution involves doubling the amount of test fluid, it
is not surprising that titers increase rapidly. In fact, the difference between titers of 1:160
& 1:320 is only a single dilution. And it doesn't necessarily represent a major difference
in disease activity.
ANA titers go up & down during the course of the disease, & may or may not reflect
disease activity. Therefore it is not always possible to tell from the titer how severe a
person's lupus is.
A titer of 1:80 or lower is usually considered negative.
The pattern of the ANA is studied by microscope. The technician examines a specially
prepared slide that shows where antibodies attack the nucleus. Certain antibodies attack
certain areas of the nucleus, producing four specific patterns.
The rim (peripheral) pattern is the most specific pattern for lupus, while the
homogeneous (diffuse) pattern is the most common pattern seen. The remaining
patterns are the speckled and nucleolar patterns. In some cases the pattern helps the
doctor decide which of the autoimmune diseases is causing the problem and which
treatment program is appropriate.
Because a positive ANA test can be found in other diseases as well as SLE, the
physician will use a positive ANA test as only one factor in determining whether or not a
patient has lupus. A positive ANA test does not mean that a person has lupus. The
physician needs to find other clinical features such as butterfly rashes, arthritis, pleurisy,
blood abnormalities, kidney disease, etc., in addition to a positive ANA test before
making a diagnosis of SLE.
The reliability of the ANA test depends upon the laboratory. Many variables can interfere
with the test & give false numbers. The accuracy of the test can also vary, depending on
many factors, such as the strength of the fluorescent antibody, or even the quality of the
microscope used.
Once a patient is found to be ANA positive, the physician may want to further investigate
which antigen in the nucleus is responsible for the positive ANA test. The knowledge of
which antigen is responsible for the positive ANA test can sometimes be helpful in
determining which disease is present. For instance, antibodies to DNA (the protein that
makes up the body's genetic code) are found primarily in SLE. Levels of these
antibodies in the blood can be useful to the physician in following the course of lupus,
especially in patients with kidney disease. Anti-DNA levels, however, do not always
perfectly match the clinical course of lupus kidney disease. Antibodies to histones (DNA
packaging proteins) may be very helpful in determining whether a patient has
drug-induced lupus. These antibodies may be found in SLE as well. Antibodies to Sm
antigen are found almost exclusively in lupus, & when present, help to clinch the
diagnosis of SLE. Antibodies to RNP (ribonucleoprotein) are found in a variety of
connective tissue diseases. When present in very high levels, they are indicative of
mixed connective tissue disease, a condition with features of SLE, polymyositis, and
scleroderma. Antibodies to SS-A are found in both lupus and Sjogren's syndrome and
are sometimes associated with babies who are born with neonatal lupus.


AND:
This response submitted by on 11/23/99.
Email Address:

FM is not autoimmune.
Some autoimmune disease do cause FM like symptoms though. Some people with FM
can have low positive ANA. but not what one would expect in something like lupus. You
should see a good rheumie and get thorough blood work done for autoimmune:
AntiDNA, Anti SM, RNP antibodies, etc. also thyroid and thyroid antibodies,
antimicrosomal.
I had low elevated ANA and ended up having lyme disease.
This could be something entirely other than FM


AND:

Lupus Support Board http://www.healthboards.com/lupus/317.html


[This message has been edited by Tincup (edited 14 February 2001).]


Posts: 20353 | From The Moon | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
pacbird
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 11

Icon 14 posted      Profile for pacbird     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow!! Awesome info Tincup!! Nice job! Definately one for the archives.
Posts: 733 | From CT | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
thanx Tincup. I also had a GRAN# test, my was HIGH at 9.4 and the normal being 1.4-6.5.
Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Kyriaka
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Also, remember that it is possible to have Lyme & Lupus. It may not be an either/or situation.

Kara Tyson
Huntsville, AL


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm extrmely upset. I have read about cases ike mine and it's not a happy one.
Although my ANA was 1:80 and last time it was 1:160, I didn't have the Anti-RNP Positive.What is MCTD isn't just another name for Lupus or Sclerodrema?
TinCUP, thanx for the email greeting.

Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cjt
Member
Member # 207

Icon 1 posted      Profile for cjt     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
hi, i was told by 3 docs that i had lupus because i had an elevated ana reading.along w/ all the other sysmptons of "lupus", or rather lyme disease. finally got to good lyme doc and discovered it was lyme not lupus and started antibiotics and low and behold the ana reading started to decrease along w/ a cholesterol level over 240. so lyme infections can give you elevated ana reading, im not to sure about other tests.but seems like lyme bacteria can reek havoc it about any area of the human body. keep asking questions and find a lyme literate doc. dont stop til you do. best of luck

Posts: 12 | From quincy,ma | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Jezebel
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gisells,

Sometime back in October or maybe November, on either the MGH MS or Lyme forum, I told you WHY some people with various autoimmune diseases, including Lupus, might show a false-positive Syphilis testing.

People with autoimmune disease, and also other disorders including some infectious diseases such as Lyme, have been found to have a relatively high incidence of
antiphospholipid antibodies (APL).

That APL has been frequently found in confirmed Lyme cases is without controversy, since Dr. Steer himself (the proverbial god of mainstream Lyme)co-authored a journal article on this fact some 10 years or more ago.

Now... the initial basic testing for syphilis uses an antigen that contains a phospholipid base. When you read information stating that false-positive results for syphilis may be due to the presence of various underlying autoimmune diseases, it's BECAUSE those with autoimmune diseases (not all but many) tend to have APL's and it's
***THE PRESENCE OF APL'S THAT CAUSES FALSE-
POSITIVE REACTION IN SYPHILIS TESTING ASSOCIATED WITH AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES*** This is an undisputed, non-controversial fact - they've known it for decades!

If I'm remembering correctly, you said you've tested NEGATIVE (more than once I think) for antiphospholipid antibodies. So, even if you truly do have Lupus, MCTD or some other related autoimmune problem, you already know you DON'T have the elevated APL's which causes the false-positive reaction to syphilis associated with autoimmune diseases.

So... that again leaves the question of why you have IgM positive and equivocal Lyme IgG western blot results and a false-positive syphilis test( was proven false by subsequent testing, correct?).

If it's not Lyme... what caused the false-positive syphilis test since it's surely not an autoimmune disorder if you're negative
for APL's?????

I looked up that Sm-RNP test. The Sm part of it is Smith antibodies and from what I can tell they're seen only in those with Lupus - but only around 30% have it. The RNP is ribonucleoprotein and it's not very disease specific since it's seen in about 80-90% of those with various autoimmune disorders, including Lupus and less frequently in other diseases.

The problem with that particular test is that it's essentially an immunoassay and just like the Lyme ELISA and every other immunoassay, the sensitivity is high but the specificity leaves much to be desired. It's really just measuring an elevated RNP level since any Sm antibody present is bound in complex to the RNP and you can't get any discrimination without running separate testing.

So I guess in essence what I'm trying to tell you Gisells is that even if you DO have Lupus or some related autoimmune thing going on (and I certainly would not be convinced by this one test), it doesn't explain the positive Lyme results nor the false-positive syphilis test.

Certainly there's always the possibility you could be lucky enough to be blessed with both diseases but personally, I'd have a real problem with just chalking off the Lyme and false-syphilis results. Without the presence of those APL's, the "autoimune disease" excuse for the false syphilis test is a fairy tale.

Wishing you well,
Jezebel


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
willow
Member
Member # 700

Icon 1 posted      Profile for willow     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well I for one agree with Tincup - I smell a rat with Lupus! Jezebel put out some good info there too.

I have hated the word "auto-immune" ever since I got Lyme. It's seems like such a wastebasket type of illness. They can't explain it so they decided your body is attacking itself. I believe this to be quite humorous actually. Why in the world would our bodies do this to us??? The tests they use to determine this phenomena don't seem to be any better than any LD test we have. They can be positive in some and negative in others blah, blah, blah.

If you get a chance look at the rheumatic.org website and you will see that they are treating Lupus patients with abx too and have been for years. They seem to have the most success with minocycline but it varies it seems. Slow and long is the method. Most people seem to take abx only 3x a week but it varies too. Many take abx for many years. They don't have complications and they get better. Many of these people seem to be in the South which doesn't surprise me. They seem to think it is an infection with some type of mycoplasma bacteria. Possibly an old strep mutated.

My aunt has scleroderma pretty bad (grew up in VA with lots of ticks....) She tried to start minocycline but wouldn't keep it up. She is pretty sick.

My thinking anymore is whatever works!!! I don't care what disease they say you have whatever makes you feel better - do it!!

Of course I am not condoning not seeking treatment for something fatal but if that is your wish then do it.

Rhuematolgists are the least helpful docs in the business.

Take care and keep reading.

Willow


Posts: 33 | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Jezebel. I have talked to my doc and even though the ANti-RNp is highly suggesstive of Mixed Connective Tissue, I'm back on Rocephin. You are real sharp!
Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
swetky
Junior Member
Member # 736

Icon 1 posted      Profile for swetky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I spent two years fighting a lupus diagnosis. The main factor in that diagnosis was an elevated ANA result. I argued that I had only two of the indicators for lupus but two dozen for lymes and basically threatened one doctor that if he took me off antibiotics and he was wrong in his diagnosis I would sue him. Luckily I eventually found a sympathetic doctor who kept me on antibiotics on the theory that they wouldn't hurt me even if she wasn't sure I had lymes. After my ANA went back to normal, several doctors insisted the test must be wrong because it was impossible for my ANA to return to normal. After one and a half years, my doctor retested me using the original lab. The lab wrote back that they had made a mistake in my original test. All subsequent tests were normal. Personally, I don't trust the lab, I think the ANA was up and the antibiotics cleared up the situation. It seems more likely that this is the case, than it is that the lab discovered their mistake after one and a half years especially since I have a hard time believing they would keep samples, etc around for that long. Go figure!
Posts: 5 | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
chicci
Member
Member # 749

Icon 1 posted      Profile for chicci   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi,
I just want to let you know i am going down the same road you are. I was diagnosed with lyme in the states but when we came to Germany the military undiagnosed me. I have fought for treatment but with no success. I decided to see an outside of the military German doctor who felt it was lyme disease with me. However i just had a positive ANA and a negative lyme test. My ANA was at 1:320 and now i go in on Monday to have the same test that you have just had and i will probley have some others ran as well. I am at the point of this whole thing thinking maybe i don't have lyme and i do possibley have LUPUS or another Auto-Immune disease. I am in pain everyday and i live a very poor quaility of life and right now i am almost willing to listen to what ever this doctor is going to tell me just so i can get some sort of treatment. This is a nightmare but try to stay on the positive side of life. I wish you well.

Chicci


Posts: 93 | From Germany | Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I had a positive ANA very early in my treatment almost 2 years ago. Since then the ANA tests have been coming back negative even though I am far from cured. So, as others have said, don't trust this test to say anything definitive about lyme vs. lupus.
Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
gisells2500
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 407

Icon 1 posted      Profile for gisells2500     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hi, Chicci. I post at the Lupus MGH forum.
Katya2500. You emailed me this. Too bad it was my own post. Thanx anyhow and listen to the folks here about the ANA, it means nothing unless you have the same test I had positive.

Posts: 349 | From germantown, MD | Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dohertyaj
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 174

Icon 1 posted      Profile for dohertyaj   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
See:

Lyme Disease Misdiagnosed as Lupus http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/6772/lupus-index.html

This site contains a spearate page for each of the following:

1. Introduction to Lyme disease and lupus, including nine reasons for
false negative Lyme disease test results
2. Medical and scientific abstracts on Lyme disease and lupus
- Abstracts supportive of a connection between Lyme disease and lupus
- Information not supportive of a connection between Lyme disease
and lupus
- Other abstracts pertaining to Lyme disease and lupus
3. Other information on Lyme disease and lupus
4. Media articles about Lyme disease and lupus
5. Lyme disease patients previously misdiagnosed with lupus
6. Resources for information about Lyme disease
7. Resources for information about lupus

Special topics for Lyme disease and lupus:

Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and Lyme disease http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Retreat/1593/rf-lyme-disease.txt

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and Lyme disease http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Retreat/1593/ana-lyme-disease.txt

---
The web site is:

Lyme Disease Misdiagnosed as ... http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/6772/lyme-misdiagnosed-as.html

Also see:

Lyme Disease in the United States and Canada http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Spa/6772/lyme.html

Lots Of Links On Lyme Disease http://www.geocities.com/HotSprings/Oasis/6455/lyme-links.html

Art Doherty
Lompoc, California
mailto:[email protected]


Posts: 162 | From Lompoc, California, USA | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GiGi
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 259

Icon 1 posted      Profile for GiGi         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This is for Chicci! There is a very qualified MD in Germany who may be able to help. He has been treating Lyme etc on the basis of bacterial and viral infections and if I needed someone overthere, that's where I would go. He sounds like a great down-to-earth guy. He has a website "dieterhassler.de". It is in German, but at least you will find phone # etc. and maybe you speak German. Or have a friend go over it with you. His info is great - but he definitely also looks at the virus side. This to me is an import fact. I only lost all lyme symptoms completely after I was treated in Mexico both for bacterial and virus infections, not with drugs but with herbals, etc. I have learned that you absolutely cannot get well on antibiotics only. Maybe if you get infected at a very young age and are treated immediately. Viruses (especially the six Herpes) live in practically all of us and they become very active when the body is under such stress. Science is also discovering that the lyme may bring along some stealth virus or two. Call Dr. Hassler - maybe he can give you advice. His practice is located in one of the biggest tick areas of Germany and he has a lot of experience and is not a novice. He also teaches at the Heidelberg University.
Maybe he can shed some light on the Lupus/Lyme question. Take care!

Posts: 9834 | From Washington State | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TX Lyme Mom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3162

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TX Lyme Mom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Up, to SAVE.
Posts: 4563 | From TX | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kam
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 3410

Icon 1 posted      Profile for kam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Giselle,

I saw your topic. Wasn't sure how i could help but was concerned so I opened it and started reading.

WOW! I am impressed. You guys are awesome.

How are you doing now Giselle?

Katherine


Posts: 15927 | From Became too sick to work or do household chores in 2001. | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Beverly
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 1271

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Beverly     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Up.
Posts: 6639 | From Michigan | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Gisell:

I don't frequent this board too much anymore - but I had to reply to your post.

I was MIS diagnosed with Lupus for many years when it was rally Lyme. My ANA was high , and I had antibodys to smooth muscle also.-

Why don't you just go ahead with the antibiotics... it's possible Lyme and Lupus are one in the same for you - as it was for me.

Do the least immunosuppressive therapy first - which is abx. You can't afford to risk immunosuppressants- which is what tehy'll want to give you for Lupus.

Barb


Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bpeck
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 3235

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bpeck     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Whoops - I should have checked the date on that one -

Geesh- anyone know how Gisell turned out????????

Barb


Posts: 1875 | From VT | Registered: Oct 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.