LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Confirmation of Link Between CFS and XMRV To Be Published Soon

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Confirmation of Link Between CFS and XMRV To Be Published Soon
Carol in PA
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 5338

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Carol in PA     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dutch Magazine: Confirmation of Link Between
CFS and XMRV To Be Published Soon

(June 22, 2010)
According to a circulating news release, researchers at the NIH and the FDA have confirmed a link between some patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and XRMV, a novel retrovirus.

Journalists at the Dutch magazine Ortho base the claim on statements made by Dr. Harvey Alter.
The statements were made in a closed-door lecture in Zagreb, Croatia.

In October 2009, researchers at the Whittemore-Peterson Institute found the retrovirus, XRMV, in 68 of 101 CFS patients, despite finding the virus in less than 4 percent of healthy controls.

The research findings quickly prompted a strong backlash from many CFS researchers, many of whom have long favored non-viral theories for the illness.
Quickly, several studies and papers challenged the findings.

But according to Alter's presentation, which has been circulating around the internet, "the data in the Lombardi, et al Science manuscript are extremely strong and likely true, despite the controversy... Although blood transmission to humans has not been proved, it is probable.

XMRV and related MLV's are in the donor supply with an early prevalence estimate of 3% to 7%. We (FDA and NIH) have independently confirmed the Lombardi group findings."

Alter states that WPI has already been able to demonstrate infectivity of XMRV in studies in which they "transmitted XMRV to rhesus macaques by the IV route and demonstrated infectivity."

Alter, who is a clinical studies chief at Department of Transfusion Medicine at the NIH, is well-known for his role in the discovery of the Hepatitis C virus.
He allegedly made the statements on XMRV and CFS at the IPFA/PEI 17th Workshop on 'Surveillance and screening of Blood Borne Pathogens.

The International Plasma Fractionation Association (IPFA), an organization based in Amsterdam, represents Dutch companies involved in plasma fractionation and blood donor safety.

If true, the findings will prompt questions about the direction and commitment of federal programs for CFS.
At a late May 2010 CFS Advisory committee meeting, scientists and clinicians passed a recommendation urging the HHS to remit blood donations from CFS patients.

However, Dr. Eleanor Hanna, director of the CFS research program at the Office of Research on Women's Health, stated that a decision to not remit CFS blood donation would prevent unnecessary public concern or fear about CFS.
In at the same meeting, Dr. Elizabeth Unger asserted that her program at the CDC remained committed to theories on metabolic syndrome and stress response, despite the published link between CFS and XRMV.

In recent weeks, several researchers have lashed out at the published link between chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and XMRV.
In an April 2010 letter to the Journal of Science, a group of CFS researchers expressed dismay that the link between CFS and XMRV was published.
Just last week, an article in the Chicago Tribune implied that XMRV research was harming scientific consensus and presented a danger to the CFS patient community.

Source: http://www.cfidsreport.com/News/10_NIH_To_Link_XMRV_CFS.html

Posts: 6956 | From Lancaster, PA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Hoosiers51
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 15759

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Hoosiers51     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Love that last sentence above. God forbid anyone do research......all kinds of terrible things could come from finding the answer apparently. (sarcasm)
Posts: 4590 | From Midwest | Registered: Jun 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Carol in PA
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 5338

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Carol in PA     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I found the info about the article above when I was reading Hillary Johnson's blog.


The Big One
June 22, 2010

Excerpts:

I received a call today from an investigator at a major American university who is involved with XMRV research.

He is the second reseacher-scientist to have advised me in as many weeks
that a major research paper is about to be published
in which the conclusions reached by the authors of the Science paper of October 9, 2009--
which linked the gammaretrovirus XMRV to chronic fatigue syndrome and proved it was infectious--
have been replicated.

In addition, the new data may be even stronger.

The agencies involved are the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health.
The paper is currently in press at a highly respected journal.

There initially was some concern that senior staff at the Centers for Disease Control might try to suppress this paper by intimidating the editors at the journal.

continued...
Source: http://oslersweb.com/blog.htm

Posts: 6956 | From Lancaster, PA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Al
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9420

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Al     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If this viral connection to CFS and also other conditions is accepted it will mean the loss of BILLIONS of dollars to the drug gurus.
Guess who will oppose or discredit the research .

It's a world of greed and corruption we live in.

Posts: 789 | From CT, | Registered: Jun 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sparkle7     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Why would it be a loss? I would think that they will adapt research from HIV to apply to make drugs for XMRV...

Seems like they will be opening up a new market.

The mystery is why they have denied money to research CFS all of these years. (See the thread I posted about money to research various illnesses.)

Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sparkle7     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
FYI-

http://flash.lymenet.org/scripts/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/1/96278?

Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Elizabeth S.
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 22405

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Elizabeth S.     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
FYI #2:

Since the CDC didn't find anything in their studies (of course they wouldn't) they're trying to prevent the other research results from being published.

A petition urging HHS permission to publish NIH & FDA XMRV article(s)

Posts: 161 | From Southern United States | Registered: Sep 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.virology.ws/2010/03/29/deep-sequencing-reveals-viral-vaccine-contaminants/

Man what a racket.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sparkle7     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Pinelady - Usually, that blog is pretty conservative...

"The sequence analysis revealed the expected vaccine strains in each preparation, and in three cases, other unexpected viral sequences. The retrovirus avian leukosis virus was found in the measles vaccine, but at a very low level (700 nucleotides from 4 sequence reads). A virus similar to simian retrovirus was identified in Rotateq (276 nucleotides from 1 sequence read). Significant levels of porcine cirovirus 1 were found in Rotarix. The entire viral genome sequence was deduced from 6344 sequence reads, comprising over 40% of the reads done for that vaccine."

-----

This doesn't necessarily mean there a link between vaccines & XMRV but it's not good. I would avoid all vaccines...

I've been hearing the MMR vaccine is particularly nasty. Some get autism after that one....

--

BTW- Is there some co-incidence of lack of funding for CFS & blocking evidence about it's retroviral origin...? I think not.

Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pam08
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 19203

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pam08     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am so furious!!! The Department of Health and Human Services stepped in and stopped this FDA/NIH study from being published.

Supposedly they were stopping the negative CDC study from being published as well until they could figure out why the results were different.

Well of course today the negative CDC study was published just as scheduled!!!

http://www.retrovirology.com/content/7/1/57

So the only one that got stopped was the positive FDA/NIH study! GRRRRR!

Both should be published...NOT just the one that the government wants everyone to see.

--------------------
Sick since 10/2001. Tested CDC positive for Lyme 10/2008 through Quest and Igenex. Started treatment 1/2009 with LLMD. Lyme, Erichilosis, Chlamydophila Pneumoniae, Q Fever, Strep Syndrome and probably a few others I am forgetting.

Posts: 451 | From Virginia | Registered: Feb 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
jarjar
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 8847

Icon 1 posted      Profile for jarjar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The gov't will step in and do whatever it wants to do to discredit whatever disease they choose.

I remember back in the 90's Dr. Myra Preston use to work down the hall from Dr. Cheney and completed her PHD. study by doing a detailed study of his cfs patients with a QEEG.

Well over 90% of his patients all showed abnormal QEEG results. The study was showing parts of the patients brain were operating in Delta and other deep sleep waves on and off while sitting upright taking test. It was plainly abnormal and not seen in the healthy population.

She submitted it to a prestigious medical review journal and they got back with her and said they wanted to publish it and said could you please downsize it as it is lengthy.

Meanwhile you guessed it when she resubmits it the powers that be stepped in and so NO we will not publish that.

Posts: 805 | From Utopia | Registered: Feb 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sparkle7     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well between these studies & the lack of funding - you can see where this is going.

It's pretty obvious to me but I like to study conspiracy theories. Is there any other reason why people who are very ill with CFS, etc. are being denied? Maybe I missed something...?

Why is it OK to have diabetes, cancer, obesity, drug addiction, heart problems, etc. & not CFS, Fibromyalgia, Gulf War syndrome. or Lyme?

Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
onbam
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have no words.

[ 07-01-2010, 05:19 PM: Message edited by: onbam ]

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Diana 85
Member
Member # 23929

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Diana 85     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Perhaps the CDC should be renamed to the CDP - Center for Disease Proliferation
Posts: 43 | From The South | Registered: Jan 2010  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Myco
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 9536

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Myco     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They are afraid to open pandora's box. Very scary what's inside for everyone.
Posts: 770 | From USA | Registered: Jul 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sparkle this is the technology they have been discussing whether to use or not in all vaccines for detection.

For me it is a no brainer---but for them they seem to be on a barb wired fence afraid they are going to rip their britches....

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
D Bergy
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9984

Icon 1 posted      Profile for D Bergy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It will be a political decision first, and any scientific considerations will be second in line.

Head lines that read "vaccines have been tainted with disease causing viruses" is not going to be readily accepted, even if it is true.

People are already suspicious of vaccines, and this would mean they were right to be. And by proxy, it means the government cannot be trusted. I am sure you can see the ramifications here. Not to mention the huge pressure that the vaccine producers might be exerting to keep this from being researched. They control much of the funding for research.

I do not know if these viruses are a serious threat in vaccines or not, but I am pretty sure the research that would tell us, is going to be shut down if possible, at least in the U.S.

Dan

Posts: 2924 | From Minnesota | Registered: Aug 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
sparkle7
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 10397

Icon 1 posted      Profile for sparkle7     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's already come out that the polio vaccines in the 1950's-60's have been tainted with SB-40 virus. This has been going on for decades! SB-40 gives people cancer. It's not a freak of nature that the cancer rate has drastically risen.

It's nothing new... The question is - why does it continue? You have to connect the dots yourself now.

Posts: 7772 | From Northeast, again... | Registered: Oct 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Pinelady
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18524

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Pinelady     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Dan I read someplace---can't remember where----that

the records of the 50-60's Polio vaccines were

pulled for research...In case you hear anything---

I am just hoping they don't get lost like some of our vaccines did.

--------------------
Suspected Lyme 07 Test neg One band migrating in IgG region
unable to identify.Igenex Jan.09IFA titer 1:40 IND
IgM neg pos
31 +++ 34 IND 39 IND 41 IND 83-93 +
DX:Neuroborreliosis

Posts: 5850 | From Kentucky | Registered: Dec 2008  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.