posted
Link to the July issue of American Family Physician BIG article on Lyme disease. Although the article is moderately better than those that were produced five years ago (we are making minute progress) it has a lot of the old guard steerian/Rahnian crap in it too. ie: two step testing...when using the ELISA as a screening test is pretty close to criminal. And the lengthy diatribe on how to assess probability is a laugh. etc etc aggghhh http://www.aafp.org/afp/20050715/297.html
troutscout
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 3121
posted
Blah...blah....blah
Posts: 5262 | From North East Iowa | Registered: Sep 2002
| IP: Logged |
Greatcod
Unregistered
posted
Here are three MD's signing off on information that is dangerous to patients. I assume they are well intentioned, decent people. But if these "contributors" can't get it right by researching the medical literature, what chance does any Primary Care physician have? The point I am making is that information crucial to the proper diagnosis and treatment of acute Lyme (no reference here to chronic) is scattered all over Medical Journal World, and in defense of Non-LLMDs, they don't really have much of a chance of getting it right. I am certain PC docs have no intention of harming people who present with Lyme, but they do.
IP: Logged |
posted
Articles such as this really makes me wonder what these ducks would do if they had Chronic Lyme? With all their quacking they do nothing more than sound like the Steere camp.
Two more weeks and off I go to a real LLMD in Missouri for the first time ever. I cannot wait.
Jean
Posts: 324 | From Lexington, KY, USA | Registered: Dec 2001
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/