LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » MA legislation

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: MA legislation
mothergoose650
Member
Member # 8962

Icon 1 posted      Profile for mothergoose650     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I received a letter from State Senator Augustus (Worcester District) on Friday. He has cosponsored legislation titled,"An Act Promoting Education and Access to Medical Care for Person with Lyme Disease". It is also sponsored by Senator Robert O'Leary.

Senator Augustus is hopeful the bill "will move quickly through the committee process and come before the full Senate for a vote during the current legislative session. Please know that if the bill does come before the Senate for a formal vote, you can expect my full support."

This bill is loosely modeled after the Rhode Island bill 5-37.5. The bill basically states:

A. "A physician may prescribe antibiotics for a patient diagnosed with Lyme disease, if this diagnosis and treatment plan is documented in the medical record for that patient.

No physician is subject to disciplinary action by the board solely for prescribing long-term antibiotic treatment for a patient clinically diagnosed with lyme disease, if this diagnosis and treatment plan is documented in the medical record for that patient.

B. Nothing in this section precludes the right of the board to deny, revoke or suspend the liscnese of any physician or disciline any physician who prescribes long-term antibiotic treatment for a non-therapeutic purpose, or who fails to monitor the ongoing care of a patient receiving long-term treatment, or who fails to keep complete and accurate records of the diasnosis and treatment of a patient receiving long-term antibiotic treatment.

The dept. shall provide state wide lyme disease education for physicians, schools and the general public. The dept. shall promote detection prevention and treatment programs for tick-borne diseases and work with graduate medical and nursing programs and establish an appropriate curriculum.

The dept. shall perform a cost-benefit analyses on insurnace coverage of long term antibiotic care for lyme disease patients. The dept. shall prolulgate regulations for the lab detection of lyme disease, for the state of art testing protocol and shall develop clinical provider training programs for the assessment and treatment of tick-borne illnesses."

Senator Augustus has been very active in Greg's treatment. Our insurance would only pay for 30 days of iv rocephin. The cost out of pocket was approx. $200/day. In desperation, I emailed Senator Augustus. He called me the next day to get more information and he was able to get our insurance co to extend Greg's treatment another 30 days saving us a lot of $$$!

He calls or emails once a month to check on Greg's condition and I'm hoping he's wearing the lyme bracelet we sent him.

Kathy


[confused]

Posts: 64 | From MA | Registered: Mar 2006  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Impressive. Hope all the MA lymies are contacting their own reps to vote for it.

It does look like there are some loopholes. For instance, that "non-therapeutic" doses thing. That is just what Klempner calls extended treatment.

And the cost benefit analysis could easily be rigged if the wrong people were doing it. Are they going to include ALL the costs of failing to provide adequate treatment: job, divorce, special schooling needs, lost productivity, additional medical costs from joint replacements, back surgery, etc etc?

Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.