Thank you for contacting me regarding legislation to authorize research and education activities concerning Lyme and other tick-borne diseases. I appreciate hearing your concerns and your personal experience with Lyme disease.
I have heard a number of concerns about the current standards for diagnosing Lyme disease, including those promulgated by the centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Some doctors who have extensive experience with Lyme believe that the CDC and IDSA guidelines are too narrow and result in many Lyme patients not receiving the proper diagnosis. Failure to treat Lyme, in turn, can cause chronic pain, fatigue, and loss of mental facilities.
While the CDC dismisses alternative methods of testing for Lyme as having inadequate scientific validation, doctors and patients report positive results from these tests and subsequent treatment. It seems clear that more research is needed to establish a stronger scientific consensus on many of the questions surrounding Lyme diagnosis and treatment. Lyme is a particularly important public health concern in the forested and mountainous regions of Northern California, which have a large population of the ticks that bear the disease.
In the 109th Congress, New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith introduced H.R. 3247, the Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease Prevention, Education and Research Act of 2005. This legislation would have authorized additional funding for research and education activities related to Lyme disease and contained a number of congressional findings noting the shortcomings of current diagnosis methods. Similar legislation has not yet been introduced in the 110th Congress.
Although I am not a member of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, which has jurisdiction over this matter, please know that I will keep your thoughts and experience in mind should the House of Representatives consider legislation concerning research on Lyme disease.
Again, thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts. Please don't hesitate to contact me in the future regarding this or any other federal issue important to you. [continues to list website address...]
Sincerely,
Wally Herger Member of Congress"
Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
Jill E.
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 9121
posted
Good for you, Michelle!
I've written and called several of my legislators and never got a response, but I believe the effort is always worthwhile, especially if they hear from a number of us.
I'm glad you got a response. It proves that some of them are listening!
Jill
-------------------- If laughter is the best medicine, why hasn't stand-up comedy cured me? Posts: 1773 | From San Diego | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am glad you got a response! Thank you for sharing it with us.
Posts: 240 | From MA | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
shazdancer
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1436
posted
Wally is incorrect. Chris Smith has re-introduced the bill in this session of Congress. It is now called HR 741, The Lyme and Tick-borne Prevention, Education, and Research Act of 2007.
And tell your congresspeople to get this one moving!
Posts: 1558 | From the Berkshires | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
michelle, OUTSTANDING letter back from wally! he had to put some work in there for the wordage he used even if he was mistaken at the end. it's hard to keep track of status of EACH bill! thanks for sharing his reponse with us all!!!
shaz, thanks for posting the link of the bill so we ALL can TRACK IT CONSTANTLY.
more important info:
Bill Overview Introduced: Jan 31, 2007
Sponsor: Rep. Christopher Smith [R-NJ]hide cosponsors
Rep. Gary Ackerman [D-NY] Rep. Brian Baird [D-WA] Rep. Melissa Bean [D-IL] Rep. Rosa DeLauro [D-CT] Rep. Wayne Gilchrest [R-MD] Rep. Raul Grijalva [D-AZ] Rep. Tim Holden [D-PA] Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL] Rep. James Langevin [D-RI] Rep. Nita Lowey [D-NY] Rep. John McHugh [R-NY] Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT] Rep. Bart Stupak [D-MI]
Cosponsorship information sometimes is out of date .
Last Action: Jan 31, 2007: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce .
NOTE! those folks who have their STATE'S FEDERAL HOUSE OF REP on this committee, should be emailing them constantly to get them to co-sponsor and APPROVE this bill so it gets OUT OF COMMITTEE this time .
this is committee who sat on this and did NOT act in dec. 06 after 3 yrs. of work of getting this bill that far !
IP: Logged |
sizzled
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1357
posted
Way to go, Michele!!! Posts: 4258 | From over there | Registered: Jul 2001
| IP: Logged |
valymemom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7076
posted
M,
Would you mind sharing your letter. It might help me compose my thoughts.
Posts: 1240 | From Centreville,VA | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
i just sent pm to valymemom and said michelle's letter is post .... 1st on top for her guidance.
IP: Logged |
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200
posted
Thanks for giving me the update. I will definitely undertake to give HIM the update, and ask him to sponsor.
However, I cannot for the life of me find the letter I wrote, even though I am sure I posted in earlier in its entirety!
Michelle
Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
valymemom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7076
posted
M,
Sorry I wasn't clear and maybe you have posted what you wrote to all the congressmen before.
I just wanted to see what you wrote to them to help me organize/compose my unorganized thoughts.
Posts: 1240 | From Centreville,VA | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
Michelle M
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7200
posted
quote:Originally posted by valymemom: M,
Sorry I wasn't clear and maybe you have posted what you wrote to all the congressmen before.
I just wanted to see what you wrote to them to help me organize/compose my unorganized thoughts.
Hey - I found it!! Don't know why that took so long.. Here 'tis:
quote: __________________________________________
Dear Mr. President, Senators Boxer and Feinstein, and Rep. Herger,
I ask for your support for two Congressional bills, now in committee, (S.1479, H.R. 3427). As you know, those bills would provide funding for prevention, education, treatment, and research activities related to Lyme disease.
The recent passed IDSA Guidelines are already causing untold harm to sick people. I'm sure you know the IDSA is being investigated by a State Attorney General for possible anti-trust breaches in formulating these arbitrary guidelines, which fly in the face of numerous peer-reviewed studies on the tenaciousness of the lyme bacteria. These new "Guidelines" declare there is no such thing as chronic lyme disease -- in bold contradiction to previous study conclusions of their chief author.
Most people with late stage lyme have been misdiagnosed repeatedly with everything from ALS to multiple sclerosis. Physician education would do much to prevent this. Unfortunately, the very foundation Americans rely on -- the CDC -- continues to mandate the outdated "2-step" testing for lyme, in spite of evidence that 75% of late lyme victims will test negative by ELISA but positive by the more accurate western blot. (Donta ST. Tetracycline therapy of chronic Lyme Disease. Clin Infect Dis 25: S52-56, 1997; abstracts of the VIIIth International Conference on Lyme Borreliosis; June 20-24, 1999; Munich, Germany. Abstract P193). Can you imagine the number of people with late stage lyme whose doctors will simply not test them further based on these CDC recommendations? These sick people are falling through the cracks.
Lyme victims are not getting help. Roughly half of them are children. My daughter, 14, was nearly crippled with knee pain from CDC positive lyme disease. Long term antibiotics returned her to playing soccer. She relapsed and suffered Bell's Palsy. Once again, she improved with antibiotics. The IDSA Guidelines would have withheld treatment from her under the pretext that chronic lyme does not exist.
In my own case, I literally had to save my own life. My neurologist - relying on the above CDC recommendations - refused a western blot despite my endemic area, recalled tick bite and rash, symptoms consistent with lyme, and numerous brain lesions. In fact I was CDC positive for not only lyme but babesia WA-1, a co-infection that he and other doctors are blissfully unaware even exists.
This should not be a partisan issue. I know of no other disease where patients have to fight for proper diagnosis and treatment due to ongoing physician ignorance. In my endemic area of northern California, most doctors continue to believe lyme is "rare." In fact, the only thing "rare" is finding a doctor knowledgeable enough to properly diagnose and treat tick-borne diseases. Physician education is sorely needed. Please support S.1479 and H.R.3427.
Thank you.
Posts: 3193 | From Northern California | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
valymemom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7076
posted
Thank you for posting this. What a help!
Posts: 1240 | From Centreville,VA | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
valymemom
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7076
posted
quote:Originally posted by valymemom: Thank you for posting this. What a help!
I will copy and take this to my moms' of teens with lyme group.
Posts: 1240 | From Centreville,VA | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
WOW MICHELLE, that was some letter your wrote your calif. senators/reps!!
it was clear, concise, hit on every major point, and told your daughter's and YOUR personal story of how CDC/IDSA has effected each of your lives.
i applaud you for a great delivery!
valyememom, i'm sorry i misunderstood your request! my mistake.
IP: Logged |
posted
Well-written letter, Michelle -- congrats on getting a good response, too -- Robin
Posts: 13117 | From San Francisco | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Deb
Posts: 54 | From Clovis, California | Registered: Nov 2006
| IP: Logged |
trueblue
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 7348
posted
Way to go Michelle! Great letter and response!
I got a call from my Congressman's office a couple of weeks ago. I was blown away and was fumbling for what to say but think I did alright, considering I didn't remember what I wrote in the letter.
Anyway, they already knew most of the important stuff I was talking to them about. They also said they wanted me to know I was heard. Way cool!
They would like more information but I'm not sure what to send them. I have the name of the appropriate person to contact in his office.
I received a follow up letter to the phone call the other day. Too long to type out, well for me anyway.
Anyone willing to guide me in what to send next please feel free to tell me what to do. I'm not a gifted writer on my own and could use some guidance or a template.
Thanks
And Woo hoo, Michelle!
-------------------- more light, more love more truth and more innovation Posts: 3783 | From somewhere other than here | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
blue, read phyllis mervine's post here about contacting legislature tomorrow to get calif. lyme bills going!
you could really do CAL. proud as well as other 49er states envying you folks for getting this far.
give them the hardship stories of yourself and others close to you. bring the reality to them with $$$ figures, out of pocket expenses for llmds, meds, lab testings, etc. TRAVELING expenses. good luck.
IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/