LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » General Support » Anyone else really angry after reading LAB 257? (Page 1)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Anyone else really angry after reading LAB 257?
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 12 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am appauled!!! I am reading it now....

The lyme chapter is what really peeved me. These co-infections are all native to other countries, not ours.

Lyme disease was even only a bacteria found in Europe. But it became a problem here shortly after the government was experimenting with infected ticks on Plum island. a german ex nazi headed up the Plum island experiments on infected ticks.

I think if this information is accurate it should warrent legal action...for infecting us..

You guys have any input...Is the book factualy accurate?

I think copies should be sent to all the senators to read. THEY them selves should read it NOT their aides.

I had heard about this book from numerous people and suspected it was interesting...but...onceI actually started it MYSELF...I am appauled and scared because I live so close to Plum island....

daniella

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Ann-OH
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2020

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Ann-OH     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I haven't seen the book, but I checked it out on Amazon.com. The author spent 7 years researching the book, and he got former Govs Cuomo and Weichert to write blurbs for the back cover for him. It was published in 2004.

The first chapter is entitled:"1975 The Lyme connection"
The author is a lawyer, general counsel for a finance company.

This looks like a pretty reliable book, not like some of the conspiracy theory jobs.

Ann - OH

[This message has been edited by Ann-OH (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 5705 | From Ohio | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paisley
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6502

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Paisley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, I am sickened as well...I am reading it now. Hard to believe we recruited these scientists. I have asked about class action suits 2x on this forum and have never received any responses. Perhaps it is based out of fear. I am especially angry because I was on Plum Island in the '80s. ..It was accessible to the public.
Posts: 298 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:
Yes, I am sickened as well...I am reading it now. Hard to believe we recruited these scientists. I have asked about class action suits 2x on this forum and have never received any responses. Perhaps it is based out of fear. I am especially angry because I was on Plum Island in the '80s. ..It was accessible to the public.

If you don't mind me asking, what do you mean when you say you were "on" the island. As a visitor, working there etc?

Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Daniella, the German you are referring to who arrived on Plum Island just after WW2 was not just any old German. It was Erich Traub, Hitler's top biowarfare expert.

It's pretty incredible that this man was working with top US Infectious Disease personnel long after Hitler came to power, and even continued to have his work published in US medical journals right up to the moment the war broke out. (Of course it was not public knowledge then that he was Hitlers top biowar man, but the US authorities obviously knew it).

After the war Traub was brought to US as part of Operation Paperclip, the secret recruitment program of nazis who had "talents" considered useful to the US cold war ambitions.

The source of Carroll's info in Lab 257 is a former Justice officer who worked on uncovering nazis after the war, and is the man who brought former UN Sec General and chancellor of Austria Kurt Waldheim down in disgrace.

A pretty hard source of facts.

Traub is known for his tick experiments IN OPEN AIR on Plum Island in the 50's, and tick colonies continued for decades after that too.

Durland Fish (Steere camp entomologist-from-hell) worked there, reportedly studying the competence of ticks as vectors of African swine fever virus.

Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by daniella:
I am appauled!!! I am reading it now....

The lyme chapter is what really peeved me. These co-infections are all native to other countries, not ours.

They were never here until these "mad" scientists brought them here.

Lyme disease was even only a bacteria found in Europe. But it arrived around the same time a german headed up the Plum island experiements.(I am 1/2 german so I am not knocking them)

I think if this information is accurate it should warrent legal action...for infecting us..

You guys have any input...Is the book factualy accurate?

I think copies should be sent to all the senators to read. THEY them selves should read it NOT their aides.

I had heard about this book from numerous people and suspected it was interesting...but...onceI actually started it MYSELF...I am appauled and scared because I live so close to Plum island....

daniella



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TheCrimeOfLyme
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 4019

Icon 1 posted      Profile for TheCrimeOfLyme     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yeah
Ive been chronically made for two years about it.


Posts: 3169 | From Greensburg, Pennsylvania | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bg
Junior Member
Member # 46416

Icon 1 posted      Profile for bg     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Where is PLUM Island?

Betty G.


Posts: 1 | From US | Registered: Aug 2015  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Does this book say that lyme and other tick borne diseases were not found in the U.S. prior to Plum Island research?

Don't think this can be true, since museum specimens more than a hundred years old have been infected with lyme. Of course, they can find it in ancient dried up animals but not in live humans.

Not saying the biowarriors haven't fooled around with this, but still not convinced that there was no native lyme.


Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 1 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think the pelts were from Europe...
Borellia was brought here from Europe. Mycoplasma was brought here from ...was it Africa? ...
http://www.harpercollins.com/authorintro/index.asp?authorid=21432 www.lab257.com

This is the authors web site....very imformative.....

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I would like to know your source on these museum specimens. My understanding is that specimens at the Smithsonian were tested. It is true that they have stuff from all over the world, but it seems unlikely to me that anyone wanting to find out the history of lyme in the U.S. would test a foreign animal.

Does it say this in the book you have? It would be helpful if we stuck to facts and named sources. Otherwise, we just give ammunition to those trolls who come to this website, find easily discredited information, and then write journal articles saying the website gives out bogus info.


In Karen Forschners book, page 38 of the first edition, it says white footed mice collected in MA in 1894 were DNA tested and positive for lyme.

[This message has been edited by lou (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lou:
white footed mice collected in MA in 1894 were DNA tested and positive for lyme.

this is true. and then some.

Lab 257 cannot be corroborated beyond any reasonable doubt.

it is much more likely, in historic models of biological evolution, that global warming (via the rise of the industrial/post industrial world) is responsible for the rise in borrelia and friends.

look at the hot spots - lyme is most often find in major suburbans areas near to cities or industrial centers.

you don't find much lyme in maine or vt (which is heavily wooded but low in emissions and industry) as compared to mass, ny, ct, nj, etc.

'believing' in Lab 257 is like taking the Da Vinci code as gospel.

it makes for a good read.

you've got top justice officers, nazi scientists, biowar materials, etc - did tom clancy write this? - and while there are some facts that are true they are strewn together and exaggerated to sensationalize the fact and ultimately....

... sell ****loads of books (if the author has good PR management).

no one is a reliable source on esoteric and classified endeavors, cum grano salis.

waste of time and energy to get upset by words on paper, better off telling people to ride their bikes and not their cars.

that will realistically slow down lyme disease more than putting a cement seal around the lab at Plum Island.

GOV Cuomo lives in my building, i'll ask him his feelings on the book if i see him in the elevator.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 1 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
zipzip-----This is a quote from Micheal Carroll's book Lab 257. "I'm grateful to my friend, former New York State Governer Mario M. Cuomo, for his sincere interest in my nascent legal and writing careers, and for sharing his philosophical ponderings with me"

'If we're lucky, someone in the media will read this carefully researched, chilling expose of a potential catastrophe and force the government to do something about it. If not, Mike Carroll's brilliant work will have been wasted and we may be the victims, once again, of government inadvertence.'
--Mario M. Cuomo, former Governor of New York

The books source notes reads like it's own book with sources like many government memorandums and reports.

And a quote from the'note to the reader': " Based largely upon interviews, official documents, and detailed research, this book is also the product of personal visits to Plum island, after the sixth of which I was abruptly denied further access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, on the grounds of national security."

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 12 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lou--

I reread that part and it only states where Originally the diseases came from, not how they migrated. I've edited my overstatement and yes, you are right to really stick to the facts on this, thanks.


daniella


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mo
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2863

Icon 5 posted      Profile for Mo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well.. I have to chime in and say just because Bb was cultured over a century ago does not mean that bio-warfare experimentation on Plum island did not contribute to the recent outbreak of what we all here know as "Lyme" disease.

Perhaps an enginered strain of Bb, or co-infection, or both.

(a huge misnomer, I feel..to call it "Lyme"..
noone I know has just Lyme, and I doubt the five or six known possible TB bacterium are coming close to identifying all..)

I think we have some facts, but allot of unknowns..

I'm sure global warming, de-forestation, interuption of eco-systems and deminishing natural predators, pesticide use killing good bugs and mini creatures with the bad..
(the Millbrook studies say that you have less of a problem in forested areas with in tact ecosystems than you do in suburbia, ect)

But I also don't think that's necessarily the whole picture, and the existance of bio-warfare experimentation is a big deal in and of itself, IMO..
who knows, maybe they experimented with tick/other vector proliferation/"hardiness", ect, ect..

I also feel that germ warfare experimentation on Plumb Island (and other locations) would be absolutely impossible to contain due to rodent, bird, and other populations..
when insects/ticks are used as vectors.

Impossible to contain, really. Especially open air, but even otherwise.

Perhaps engineered strains were made to be more transmissable by human vectors.
(similar to Gulf War Mycoplasma and the high incidence in families contracting it from vets)

I think "Lyme" contains some of what was around along time, and lots of other variations, mutations, bits and pieces of stuff that could well be engineered..
it sure acts like it is in many chronic cases...
..due to nature taking it's course in transporting and blending the microbes.

Mo

[This message has been edited by Mo (edited 29 March 2005).]


Posts: 8337 | From the other shore | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
1. You say "Lab 257 cant be corroborated beyond any doubt". What do you mean specificially , Zip? The entire book? The chapter on Lyme? The theory that Lyme-causing borrelia escaped from there? the theory that it was studied there, whether it escaped or not? The idea that ticks were experimented onthere for military purposes? What?

quote:
Originally posted by zipzip:
this is true. and then some.

Lab 257 cannot be corroborated beyond any reasonable doubt.

it is much more likely, in historic models of biological evolution, that global warming (via the rise of the industrial/post industrial world) is responsible for the rise in borrelia and friends.>

Zip says:

No. In Europe for example there are many forested areas crawling with Lyme but not near any industrialised centre.

Zip:

Anyone here from Maine or Vt like to comment on that? Esp Maine?

zip:

No all that is demonstrably true.

Are you the same zip zip who posts on sci-med and is freinds with Weisman?
Lisa

<- and while there are some facts that are true they are strewn together and exaggerated to sensationalize the fact and ultimately....

... sell ****loads of books (if the author has good PR management).

no one is a reliable source on esoteric and classified endeavors, cum grano salis.

waste of time and energy to get upset by words on paper, better off telling people to ride their bikes and not their cars.

that will realistically slow down lyme disease more than putting a cement seal around the lab at Plum Island.

GOV Cuomo lives in my building, i'll ask him his feelings on the book if i see him in the elevator.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 28 March 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The trouble is that when you mix in all these wild sounding speculations with what is actually no-question-about-it happening in diagnosing and treating the disease, then part A tends to discredit part B.

What the biowarriors do is dangerous, possibly not in complete control, and something the government is not going to give us the details about, especially if they have contributed to an epidemic. If you look at govt goofs in the past, the perpetrators never confess or apologize. It is only years later, if then, that the story comes out and officials make apologies or restitution.

So, I think we should concentrate on the known crimes, not the unknown.

Of course, getting het up about lay people making plumb unsubstantiated claims on an internet forum is probably not worth doing, when the professionals are lying their heads off in published journals and being rewarded for it. It is certainly frightening that the same people doing this are involved in any way with biowarfare. Do we need unscrupulous researchers medalling around in pandora's box? Who needs enemies, with people like this on "our side?"

To Zip - you live in the governor's mansion? Would this be the basement or the attic? Ha, ha. Couldn't resist.


Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sorry about the garbled message. Not yet used to the L-Net reply-quoting system, which is different to many other boards.

Zip, can you start off by answering my first question?

And also can you answer the question I've asked you many times, ie - are you the same zippy who posts on sci.med.diseases.lyme and is a great friend of "Weisman"?

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by Lymerayja:
1. You say "Lab 257 cant be corroborated beyond any doubt". What do you mean specificially , Zip? The entire book? The chapter on Lyme? The theory that Lyme-causing borrelia escaped from there? the theory that it was studied there, whether it escaped or not? The idea that ticks were experimented onthere for military purposes? What?



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well Lou, I only half agree with you here. Speculations that are wild and not backed up by any evidence whatsoever are obviously damaging for us. But I've read Lab 257 and what Carroll says ranged from the possible but not yet proven to the hard fact. That's why I asked Zip to state what he believes should be totally dismissed?

It's true governments don't normally admit the truth when they've been responsible for horrendous coverups. But they can sometimes be forced to admit it. In the 80's the French government was guilty of a horrendous scandal involving HIV and donor blood, the Minister went down as a result.

Recently here in the UK a family won compensation , after decades, from the govt which finally admitted liability after the the "common cold" research programme (which continued till fairly recently) their relative had volunteered for had led to his agonising death from the chemical weapons tested on him.

Now all the others involved want to sue too.

You might say, so what if the Lyme epidemic was the result of some horrendous military experiment, what's the use of raking up the past? A fight for compensation would be long and hard and may never be won.

Well, there's lots of answers to that, and the most important of them is this - even today, a fantastic proportion of the Steere camp policy-makers are military officers and/or bioweaponeers. (Of course we can add to that those who do it because of their links with the insurance industry, certain biotech companies etc.)

In other words, we need to understand what happened in the past to understand what is going on in the present, and also to be able to predict the future.

If we'd all understood the military role in the Lyme tragedy, would we ever have trusted a guy like Klempner, for example, who's been involved in bioweapons for years?


Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by lou:
The trouble is that when you mix in all these wild sounding speculations with what is actually no-question-about-it happening in diagnosing and treating the disease, then part A tends to discredit part B.

What the biowarriors do is dangerous, possibly not in complete control, and something the government is not going to give us the details about, especially if they have contributed to an epidemic. If you look at govt goofs in the past, the perpetrators never confess or apologize. It is only years later, if then, that the story comes out and officials make apologies or restitution.

So, I think we should concentrate on the known crimes, not the unknown.

Of course, getting het up about lay people making plumb unsubstantiated claims on an internet forum is probably not worth doing, when the professionals are lying their heads off in published journals and being rewarded for it. It is certainly frightening that the same people doing this are involved in any way with biowarfare. Do we need unscrupulous researchers medalling around in pandora's box? Who needs enemies, with people like this on "our side?"

To Zip - you live in the governor's mansion? Would this be the basement or the attic? Ha, ha. Couldn't resist.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bettyg:
Where is PLUM Island?

Betty G.


Betty, Plum Island is in the eastern tip of Long Island, a tick hop from the town of Lyme, Ct (literally, just across a narrow strip of water which is swum regularly by deer).

If you couldnt find it on your map, it's because the US govt made sure this "civilian facility" was not marked on many maps.

Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mo
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2863

Icon 6 posted      Profile for Mo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I agree with Lisa in regard to the importance of the staggering realization that Klempner and other "Steerites" are connected to bio-warfare.

It seems that that..coupled with the known financial ties to the insurance companies..
AND their writings, which have at times been extremely medically/scientifically outlandish and contradictory..
(look at Steere's old writings, for one instance, compared to the new when these concerns/connections became more evident)..

All these things make for a pretty good case to discredit their work..
work which insurance Guidelines and inadequate/dangerous care or lack of are based on for the majority of patients.

If they can be completely discredited, there is a chance that more adequate care can begin to become a possibility..
cases treated early and adequately,chronic cases referred to specialists.. ect, ect, ect..

You know..it's the people that have to make a stink.

It wasn't until Aids activists thrw blood on the steps of St. Patricks cathedral that Docs took that HIV was acknowledged for what it was.

Polly Murray got mothers to band together and find the cause for the children in CT coming down with what looked like rhumetoid arthritis..
(which, by the way, was the initial way this manifested across from Plumb island..with an autoimmune component..a bacteria that evaded and confused the immune response..tangent..sorry)

Amyway..not saying we should become fanatical..
but in this case, the evidence seems piled high for an organized refute..
how can these connections be ignored much longer?

Mo


Posts: 8337 | From the other shore | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 1 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I feel the same way Mo...
What do we do?
If there is enough info to make an interesting and valid accusation where and how to do it, is the question.

We would need numbers of people who want to act on this. Numbers who have read the book. The author is also a lawyer(interesting note). I wonder what his take on this would be, maybe we should find out.

I believe the book and all of its factual and referential points...

edited for spelling
daniella

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 29 March 2005).]


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Lymerayja:
Speculations that are wild and not backed up by any evidence whatsoever are obviously damaging for us.

That's why I asked Zip to state what he believes should be totally dismissed?


well you can't have it both ways.

i don't totally dismiss the book btw, but it is fairly conveniant to lay a befuddled etymology on the doorstep of a singular presentation.

i said there may be some truth, but that it is greatly exaggerated. furthermore it is not corroborated by any other journalists or high ranking professionals... also fairly conveniant.

per example the same 'nazi' scientist Erich Traub has also been the fictionalized culprit of AIDS, ebola, west nile virus, BSE, a multitude of Cancers and practically every other 20th century emerging pathogen.

it's a runaway story, he is the perfect candidate for the sinister evil villain; scientist, german, maybe even a Nazi? it reads like a Tom Clancy novel, or a biomedical version of Die Hard.

in the early 1930's, before the rise of Hitler, Traub was already well established as a scientist in the US at the The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, N. J.

was borrelia tested on by the US govt? probably. i mean they expolded atom bombs in the desert in Nevada afterall.

as you well know, look at what Klempner is doing with Tuleremia in Boston with grant money. but case in point there has been no outbreak of tuleremia in beantown (but a couple of inhouse contiminations unfortunately).

maybe i'm dead wrong about all this, but I highly doubt it. either way i couldn't care less. it is history, real or otherwise, and you can't change it now.

even if it were true, like the US govt would do anything about it. maybe an official apology 50 years after they vaccinated everyone.

the evolutionary model makes plenty of more sense as it is. Lyme, like all diseases and organic forms of life, are part of an interweaved and intelligent pattern.

hardly ever have there been isolated instances by human hands that have significantly changed that pattern. in fact i can't think of one that has significantly altered the world with the exception of Hiroshima and Chernoybl.

case in point - a Stanford study last year showed that global warming led to the death of the passenger piegon in the US in the early 20th century.

at one time it was the most populated bird in America.

the passenger piegon's source of nourishment? ticks.

within the evolutionary model there is certainly room for something like a Plum Island to add insult to injury, but it surely in no way responsible for the pandemic of Lyme.

off topic - i am the one and only zipzip I know of.

weisman is not my 'buddy' by any means, he has plenty of venemous faults, but he certainly is not McSweegan. lol.

regardless that should have no effect on what i think or state anywhere.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 29 March 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
ok zippy, I'm glad you answered my question re you and weisman. I'll write about that in another thread.

As regards Lab 257.

You are saying that Erich Traub has been fictionalised and blamed for every disease under the sun. I don't know, I think most people have never even heard of him till the book Lab 257 came out.

The info that Traub was Hitler's top biowarfare man, that he was recruited by the US after the war, that he was brought to Plum Island, and that he did conduct tick experiments there, originated with John Loftus. Loftus used to work for the Justice Dept., and is the man whose efforts to uncover old nazis still in the woodwork exposed the nazi past of Kurt Waldheim, the Chancellor of Austria and Secretary General of the UN. In other words, an extremely powerful man. Yet Loftus' evidence was so watertight that it brought Waldheim down.

Do you see? Those facts I mentioned above on Traub are no crazy7 "conspiracy theory", but have come from a pretty rock-solid source. Do you think two ex-Governors would have risked their reputations in endorsing a wild conspiracy novel?

You say Traub was already established in the US before the rise of Hitler. Traub belonged to a pro-Nazi club on the east coast, and was working with the Rockefeller Institute AFTER Hitler came to power, and indeed as I said, was publishing in US medical journals right up to the outbreak of the war, 6 years after Hitler came to power.

You say that although Klempner had tularemia escapes in his lab, there's been no escape in Boston yet. That's a very thin argument, zip. Its like a guy who jumps off the roof of a 20 storey building, and as he passes the second floor he says "See, nothing has happened to me so far."

Then you imply that even if Lyme has arisen as a result of things the military did, well, it's history. I am saying no, it's clearly not history, because the Steere camp is dominated by people from that same background (as well as the insurance whores etc) and the result is there is NO POSSIBILITY of true advancement in terms of recognition, proper diagnosis, treatment, search for new cures and allevaiation of mass suffering until this rotten crew is kicked off the playing field.

Just look at the persecution of our LLMDs(which your friend Weisman loves to join in).

I agree that the US (or British or other NATO) governments are not going to do snything about it off their own bat. This is because they have been supporting the cover-up for decades. A military coverup implies a government coverup, as the senior military officers do not have carte blanche to do what they like without agreement at top level.

Because the governments are involved, it will not be enough to simply fund our good doctors to do good research. The good research will be denied exposure in medical journals and the lay media; while the Steere camp crap will be blasted at us from all those sources, plus from the pulpits of CDC and NIH (whose Lyme desks have always been staffed by military and biowarfare types such as Baker, McSweegan, Dennis etc). A good example is the garbagey article sttaing that our good Lyme info sites are spreading misinformation. This article went out on Reuters, potentially reaching millions.

We need to devise ways to expose this huge corruption, because as I say, good science on its own is not enough. Our good docs will get sidelined at best, persecuted at worst, until we make the political stink needed for their voices to be heard.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by zipzip:
well you can't have it both ways.

i don't totally dismiss the book btw, but it is fairly conveniant to lay a befuddled etymology on the doorstep of a singular presentation.

i said there may be some truth, but that it is greatly exaggerated. furthermore it is not corroborated by any other journalists or high ranking professionals... also fairly conveniant.

per example the same 'nazi' scientist Erich Traub has also been the fictionalized culprit of AIDS, ebola, west nile virus, BSE, a multitude of Cancers and practically every other 20th century emerging pathogen.

it's a runaway story, he is the perfect candidate for the sinister evil villain; scientist, german, maybe even a Nazi? it reads like a Tom Clancy novel, or a biomedical version of Die Hard.

in the early 1930's, before the rise of Hitler, Traub was already well established as a scientist in the US at the The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, N. J.

was borrelia tested on by the US govt? probably. i mean they expolded atom bombs in the desert in Nevada afterall.

as you well know, look at what Klempner is doing with Tuleremia in Boston with grant money. but case in point there has been no outbreak of tuleremia in beantown (but a couple of inhouse contiminations unfortunately).

maybe i'm dead wrong about all this, but I [b]highly doubt it. either way i couldn't care less. it is history, real or otherwise, and you can't change it now.

even if it were true, like the US govt would do anything about it. maybe an official apology 50 years after they vaccinated everyone.

the evolutionary model makes plenty of more sense as it is. Lyme, like all diseases and organic forms of life, are part of an interweaved and intelligent pattern.

hardly ever have there been isolated instances by human hands that have significantly changed that pattern. in fact i can't think of one that has significantly altered the world with the exception of Hiroshima and Chernoybl.

case in point - a Stanford study last year showed that global warming led to the death of the passenger piegon in the US in the early 20th century.

at one time it was the most populated bird in America.

the passenger piegon's source of nourishment? ticks.

within the evolutionary model there is certainly room for something like a Plum Island to add insult to injury, but it surely in no way responsible for the pandemic of Lyme.

off topic - i am the one and only zipzip I know of.

weisman is not my 'buddy' by any means, he has plenty of venemous faults, but he certainly is not McSweegan. lol.

regardless that should have no effect on what i think or state anywhere.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 29 March 2005).][/B]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
There are actually a number of people who have been working on this. I think it would be a good idea if all those who have been plus all those who want to be, got together in a co-ordinated project. The first thing would be to collate all the available information together so we can see exactly what we've got, then we could decide how to use it.

Michael Carroll is connected with a law firm, I am sure there would be many other lawyers and also journalists around the world who would be interested, once all the information is put together, as long as it is backed up by watertight references.

Also, I think we should see Plum Island as only one part of a bigger picture. Military work on tick-borne disease has been carried out here in Britain too (as one example). NATO has supplied funding to ensure that all European Lyme diagnosis and treatment would be "standardised" ie to the appalling Steere camp standards.

What I am saying is that there is potentially a huge number of people who have been hurt by all this, not just in Ct or even in the US.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by daniella:
I feel the same way Mo...
What do we do?
If there is enough info to make an interesting and valid accusation where and how to do it, is the question.

We would need numbers of people who want to act on this. Numbers who have read the book. The author is also a lawyer(interesting note). I wonder what his take on this would be, maybe we should find out.

I believe the book and all of its factual and referential points...

edited for spelling
daniella

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 29 March 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 1 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lisa--

I definately want to join up and help. Can you give me some info on this...

daniella


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Aligondo Bruce
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6219

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Aligondo Bruce     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think that there is a whole lot more to this issue than people realize.
It's not just an accident at plum island. I haven't read the book but it seems to me the author may have missed the boat.


Lisa--

I definately want to join up and help. Can you give me some info on this...

daniella[/QUOTE]


Posts: 523 | From Stillwater,OK,USA | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Linda LD
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 6663

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Linda LD     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sign me up.

I want to help. Someone email me.

Linda


Posts: 1171 | From Knoxville, TN US | Registered: Dec 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lou
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 81

Icon 1 posted      Profile for lou     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am bowing out at this point. In the past I have avoided threads like this. Should have stuck to the policy.

We can't even get our act together on small lyme activism projects, how in the world are a handful of sick people going to take on something like biowarfare?

Zip, I disagree with the passenger pigeon stuff. Don't know what the Stanford study said, but global warming did not do in this pigeon. Read what Audubon says about the slaughter of these birds long ago. Global warming didn't wipe out the big bison herds or the passenger pigeons. Humans did that.

[This message has been edited by lou (edited 30 March 2005).]


Posts: 8430 | From Not available | Registered: Oct 2000  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lou, I'm sorry that you are bowing out, because I'm sure people would like to have you on board.

Just to clarify for Daniella and others, there isn't a formal group working on this stuff (as far as I know), just a loose informal network of individuals from many different places. If people want to set up a formal group, it might a good way to get things on a more organised plane.

It was up till recently a bit risky to even discuss the subject, IMO, but so much has leaked out now, that things have changed. For instance, in the UK, even the Conservative Party have been publicly talking about the Lyme cover up. And you don't get much more conservative than the Conservative Party.

On the pigeon stuff - zippy, I also don't get what you're saying. The passenger pigeons are known to have been wiped out by mass hunting and destruction of their nesting sites by man about 100 years ago. I never heard that they ate ticks.

I don't know about passenger pigeons, but modern pigeons are parasitised by ticks, and birds in general are being recognised more and more as serious culprits of Lyme spread.

An English study of several different types of tick found the highest percent of Lyme infection in Ixodes uriae , the sea-bird tick. Lab 257 has a map that does seem to show that bird fly-routes from Plum Island to the coastal towns do mimic the lines of Lyme spread pretty closely.

But as Bruce said, Plum Island is not the whole story, just a part.

Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by lou:
I am bowing out at this point. In the past I have avoided threads like this. Should have stuck to the policy.

We can't even get our act together on small lyme activism projects, how in the world are a handful of sick people going to take on something like biowarfare?

Zip, I disagree with the passenger pigeon stuff. Don't know what the Stanford study said, but global warming did not do in this pigeon. Read what Audubon says about the slaughter of these birds long ago. Global warming didn't wipe out the big bison herds or the passenger pigeons. Humans did that.

[This message has been edited by lou (edited 30 March 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Lymerayja:
We need to devise ways to expose this huge corruption, because as I say, good science on its own is not enough. Our good docs will get sidelined at best, persecuted at worst, until we make the political stink needed for their voices to be heard.

Lisa


well i applaud your determination, best of luck. you'll need it going up against the most impenetrable forces in the world, seriously.


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What can actually be done without getting either stonewalled or killed?

You think I'm joking? But I'm not. I don't see what can be done. People are not going to talk and if they do talk off the record you can't publish it.


Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't think you're joking. Of course the bastards will fight us with everything they have, and yes, they have a lot.

But what they don't understand, is every time a person finds out the one they love has been disabled through chronic Lyme, and that they have been UNNECESSARILY denied treatment; every parent who is forced to watch the suffering of their child and can do nothing about it, when something can be done about it - all these people potentially turn into 24-hour a day, 7-days a week soldiers in this battle , once they understand what's going on.


Every young person watching their best years evaporate while their friends are out having fun. Every person whose marriage, relationship, family, job, self-respect have been destroyed by this.


Every one who has had to watch a loved one scream or moan from pain that's not touched by our wonder analgesics, or watch someone they love who has gone blind, lost their ability to walk, to talk to remember, to think straight etc etc etc.

Everyone who lost a friend or a lover or a parent or a brother or a son or a daughter through Lyme suicide.


Everyone of those people affected by Lyme and all those close to them, has every reason to fight with everything they've got, once they realise that the so-called Lyme controversy is not a "controversy", but a DELIBERATE cover-up by the Steere camp.

Every day, the Steere camp create thousands of potential soldiers against them who, once understanding the origin of their misery, have no choice but to fight to the bitter end.


Yes, some are overwhelmed, some do commit suicide, and some give in to apathy and just do nothing. But there are enough people out there who would act if only they knew what would be effective.

The day everyone wakes up to what's going on, the Steere camp have a hell of a fight on their hands. Even people who can't stand up can contribute to the fight if they have a computer keyboard or a friend who will tap it for them.

Sure, they may try and kill some of us. There will always be new replacements. They ***** up so many lives, that they create full-time soldiers against themselves every day.

Anyway, the genie is out of the bottle now. None of us wanted to be full-time soldiers fighting them. They forced us to!

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
What can actually be done without getting either stonewalled or killed?

You think I'm joking? But I'm not. I don't see what can be done. People are not going to talk and if they do talk off the record you can't publish it.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lisa, re: "Steere camp", it's not that small a thing...one person, one camp.

I just don't see how ordinary people are going to get classified information, just because they or people they love are sick.

Look at all the vets who suffer from depleted uranium, or who got the experimental anthrax vaccine without their knowledge, which contained squalene adjuvant, which is a known autoimmune disease inducer--so many are ill, these are vets, there's a big book out about it, are they being taken care of? Not.

I'm not being negative but there's little likelihood of penetrating the system truly, to get all the secrets out and if you were good enough to get the data you'd probably get killed.

I think its horrible but its part of the military industrial complex and what do they care. They didn't care about nuclear testing. They don't care about young men dying for oil. THey don't care that carelessness put bioweaponized bugs in ticks out into the wild and now because of suburban growth, global warming, and love of Bambi, we've got a deadly epidemic that is ruining lives.

The thing is so big, and there's a pleasure in playing God and letting humans be pawns. There's almost a hidden desire to create suffering even here--not just "there" in the outgroup among the enemy.

This is how I really feel but I don't think diverse lyme patients can get proof (Lab 257 is interesting but there's no proof of anything in it so he's safe) and if one of them somehow could (and I'm not volunteering) they would probably die in a mysterious accident.


Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
Lisa, re: "Steere camp", it's not that small a thing...one person, one camp.

This is how I really feel but I don't think diverse lyme patients can get proof (Lab 257 is interesting but there's no proof of anything in it so he's safe) and if one of them somehow could (and I'm not volunteering) they would probably die in a mysterious accident.


thank you for a realistic viewpoint, you may be the smartest person to post on this thread.

not that i disagree with lisa's last posting at all. i applaud her determinism but it is bordering on the precipe of sheer, futile romanticism.

aka don't shoot for the stars when you can do good work right in your own backyard.

and you can't save everyone, or anyone, (in a non-christian sin/redemption sense) until you save yourself.

unfortunately such rhetoric is so loose to be adaptable to be intepreted in any sense, but i mean it in the simplest, realistic and most rudimentary form.


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lou:
Zip, I disagree with the passenger pigeon stuff. Don't know what the Stanford study said, but global warming did not do in this pigeon.

we are both correct. it is an ecological devastation.

in addition to climate change and hunting rules is the rise of industrialization, suburbanization, clear cutting, agri-business and host of other wonderful evolutionary changes that have disregarded enviromental impact and have led to gross unintended consequences.

here is a good legal history which documents all this, and unlike LAB 257, this is corroborated. but without the nazi spies it is not as delicious of a read. lol.
http://law.wustl.edu/centeris/Confpapers/Chenfinal.html

maybe plum island was a player, but in reality it cannot be counted on as an etyolgy for the rise in borrelia bacterium.

the evolutionary model stands the test of time, unless you are an anti-darwinist jerk.

also i recalled incorectly. the passenger piegon survived on acorns. the same thing that the main agents of lyme disease, the white tailed deer and white footed mouse, subsist on. they didn't actually eat the ticks.

the institute of ecological studies has called it the 'acorn connection'.

stanford excerpt :
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/2004/pr-Birds-0112.html

law of unintended consequences :
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FWE/is_12_7/ai_111698192

"Many of you will know about the passenger pigeon, which numbered in the billions in the early part of the 19th century and became extinct when the last known representative, Martha, died in captivity on September 1, 1914.

The size of passenger pigeon flocks were legendary and often estimated to contain as many as 4 billion birds! It must have been an amazing sight as pigeons darkened the skies.

The bird's rapid extinction was primarily us. They were such easy targets that one gunshot could kill a dozen birds. At one time, passenger pigeon hunting competitions were held that required killing a minimum of 30,000 birds to even be close to winning!

Interestingly, Lyme disease, the illness that is spread to thousands of people annually by ticks, is tied to the extinction of the passenger pigeon.

As part of their natural cycle, oak trees produce an extra abundance of acorns every few years. Until they were rendered extinct by human beings, these huge flocks of passenger pigeons thrived on these acorns in northeastern forests.

This additional acorn production by oak trees toppled the dominos in an ecological chain reaction. Acorns attract the two key animals that are critical to Lyme disease dispersion--white-tailed deer and the white-footed mouse.

Both love to eat acorns, and with the vanishing of competition of the passenger pigeons these two animals bred more and provided increasingly hospitable hosts to ticks and their Lyme bacteria.

A century later, when folks walk through the woods in the spring they connect with these ticks and become exposed to Lyme disease.

If the passenger pigeon had survived to help keep the acorn supply in check, would we still have had a Lyme disease epidemic? A simple player change in the ecology can cause major change down the line."

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 30 March 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
OK, a lot of what you're saying is very valid. It's not easy to get classified information. However, some of this stuff has already leaked out.

Also, an expose can be done in stages, it need not be all at once.

For me, rather than immediately trying to define what exactly has been done by military scientists and for what noxious purpose, we could start with a small step. The step is this - can we prove that the MAJORITY of the Steere camp are either military officers/biowarfare scientists and/or have a glaring conflict of interest with industry (insurance, Glaxo, test-kit makers etc).

I would postulate that we can prove this ALREADY, without requiring anyone to risk their lives revealing classified information, and using mainly material that's already in the public domain!.

Now, the fact that so many of the top Steere camp swine come from such arenas cannot be a co-incidence.

Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
Lisa, re: "Steere camp", it's not that small a thing...one person, one camp.

I just don't see how ordinary people are going to get classified information, just because they or people they love are sick.

Look at all the vets who suffer from depleted uranium, or who got the experimental anthrax vaccine without their knowledge, which contained squalene adjuvant, which is a known autoimmune disease inducer--so many are ill, these are vets, there's a big book out about it, are they being taken care of? Not.

I'm not being negative but there's little likelihood of penetrating the system truly, to get all the secrets out and if you were good enough to get the data you'd probably get killed.

I think its horrible but its part of the military industrial complex and what do they care. They didn't care about nuclear testing. They don't care about young men dying for oil. THey don't care that carelessness put bioweaponized bugs in ticks out into the wild and now because of suburban growth, global warming, and love of Bambi, we've got a deadly epidemic that is ruining lives.

The thing is so big, and there's a pleasure in playing God and letting humans be pawns. There's almost a hidden desire to create suffering even here--not just "there" in the outgroup among the enemy.

This is how I really feel but I don't think diverse lyme patients can get proof (Lab 257 is interesting but there's no proof of anything in it so he's safe) and if one of them somehow could (and I'm not volunteering) they would probably die in a mysterious accident.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Zippy, IMO the best work LymeNet can do in its "own backyard" is sweeping out the rubbish. You have been playing games with us.

I have already confronted you in the thread called "Zipzip, Weisman etc" and asked you why you are so friendly to a man who constantly heaps hatred on the whole of LymeNet, condemns the whole of ILADS, and organises the active persecution of people who speak out vocally against the Steere camp?

I'm talking about the weasel called "A Weisman" on the usenet, of course. And all you can say is that you have "no problem" with him.

Then you come in here and try and discourage people from exposing the huge conflicts of interest the Steere camp with the military and with insurance and other corporations.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by zipzip:

aka don't shoot for the stars when you can do good work right in your own backyard.




Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Zip you are starting to grate.

I have already pointed out to you that msome of the most important facts in Lab 257 have been corroborated by a guy whose evidence was powerful enough to bring down the former secretary general of the UN and chancellor of Austria, but you just keep repeating that the book is "not corroborated".


You make fun of it as sensationalism and "nazi spy" stories etc..

You've read the book. So you should know, that the book does not refer to any Nazi "spy" at all. It refers to a Nazi who was Hitler's top biowarfareman, who was DELIBERATELY RECRUITED by the US government (and by the way, the British were interested in him too)as part of their cold war effort.

It explains that this man (Traub) was a founding father of Plum Island, and was even invited to head it!

It explains that he was engaged in tick experimentation there, at a time when offensive biowarfare was still respectable, and an openly admitted military policy of the US.


All of which is corroborated by John Loftus, the unimpeachable source mentioned above.

Now let's imagine for a moment that you are right, zipzap, and the tick experiments on Plum island did not involve zoonotic diseases, or the risk of creating zoonotic diseases, and in fact, the Lyme pandemic today has no connection with any military issue anywhere in the world at any time, but is the result of the decimation of the passenger pigeon population in the eastern US at the end of the 19th century (with nearly a 100 year gap till the appearance of the problem).

Why the hell then is the Steere camp run by military types instead of ornithologists?

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by zipzip:

here is a good legal history which documents all this, and unlike LAB 257, this is corroborated. but without the nazi spies it is not as delicious of a read. lol.
http://law.wustl.edu/centeris/Confpapers/Chenfinal.html

maybe plum island was a player, but in reality it cannot be counted on as an etyolgy for the rise in borrelia bacterium.

the evolutionary model stands the test of time, unless you are an anti-darwinist jerk.

also i recalled incorectly. the passenger piegon survived on acorns. the same thing that the main agents of lyme disease, the white tailed deer and white footed mouse, subsist on. they didn't actually eat the ticks.

the institute of ecological studies has called it the 'acorn connection'.

stanford excerpt :
http://www.stanford.edu/dept/news/pr/2004/pr-Birds-0112.html

law of unintended consequences :
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0FWE/is_12_7/ai_111698192

"Many of you will know about the passenger pigeon, which numbered in the billions in the early part of the 19th century and became extinct when the last known representative, Martha, died in captivity on September 1, 1914.

The size of passenger pigeon flocks were legendary and often estimated to contain as many as 4 billion birds! It must have been an amazing sight as pigeons darkened the skies.

The bird's rapid extinction was primarily us. They were such easy targets that one gunshot could kill a dozen birds. At one time, passenger pigeon hunting competitions were held that required killing a minimum of 30,000 birds to even be close to winning!

Interestingly, Lyme disease, the illness that is spread to thousands of people annually by ticks, is tied to the extinction of the passenger pigeon.

As part of their natural cycle, oak trees produce an extra abundance of acorns every few years. Until they were rendered extinct by human beings, these huge flocks of passenger pigeons thrived on these acorns in northeastern forests.

This additional acorn production by oak trees toppled the dominos in an ecological chain reaction. Acorns attract the two key animals that are critical to Lyme disease dispersion--white-tailed deer and the white-footed mouse.

Both love to eat acorns, and with the vanishing of competition of the passenger pigeons these two animals bred more and provided increasingly hospitable hosts to ticks and their Lyme bacteria.

A century later, when folks walk through the woods in the spring they connect with these ticks and become exposed to Lyme disease.

If the passenger pigeon had survived to help keep the acorn supply in check, would we still have had a Lyme disease epidemic? A simple player change in the ecology can cause major change down the line."

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 30 March 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
laserred
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6796

Icon 1 posted      Profile for laserred     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No comments, just following this thread and found this site interesting...I believe when reading it I saw where it stated 'when the (2) boxes of files were opened they were found empty'.

Project PAPERCLIP: www.spitfirelist.com/f480.html

[This message has been edited by laserred (edited 30 March 2005).]


Posts: 493 | From MidWest NorthWoods | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 14 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes it is an interesting site, with may pertinent quotes from Lab 257. Here's some important stuff, for those who don't have the book:


``A biological warfare mercenary who worked under three flags--Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, and the United States--Traub was never investigated for war crimes. He escaped any inquiry into his wartime past. The full extent of his sordid endeavors went with him to his grave.

While America brought a handful of Nazi war criminals to justice, it safeguarded many others in exchange for verses to the new state religion--modern science and espionage.

Records detailing a fraction of Eric Traub's activities are now available to the public, but most are withheld by Army intelligence and the CIA on grounds of national security. But there's enough of a glimpse to draw quite a sketch.'' (Ibid.; p. 11.)


11. An important chapter in the story of how the inquiry into the possible link between Plum Island, Erich Traub's work on behalf of the US and the spread of Lyme Disease concerns the work of former Justice Department prosecutor John Loftus.

In his book The Belarus Secret, Loftus referred to work done on Plum Island in the early 1950's in which Nazi scientists were experimenting on diseased ticks. Might that have referred to Traub?!

`` . . . Attorney John Loftus was hired in 1979 by the Office of Special Investigations, a unit set up by the Justice Department to expose Nazi war crimes and unearth Nazis hiding in the United States. Given top-secret clearance to review files that had been sealed for thirty-five years, Loftus found a treasure trove of information on America's postwar Nazi recruiting.

In 1982, publicly challenging the government's complacency with the wrongdoing, he told 60 minutes that top Nazi officers had been protected and harbored in America by the CIA and the State Department. `They got the Emmy Award,' Loftus wrote. `My family got the death threats.''' (Ibid.; p. 13.)


12. ``Old spies reached out to him after the publication of his book, The Belarus Secret, encouraged that he--unlike other authors--submitted his manuscript to the government, agreeing to censor portions to protect national security. The spooks gave him copies of secret documents and told him stories of clandestine operations.

From these leads, Loftus ferreted out the dubious Nazi past of Austrian president and U.N. secretary general Kurt Waldheim. Loftus revealed that during World War II, Waldheim had been an officer in a German Army unit that committed atrocities in Yugoslavia. A disgraced Kurt Waldheim faded from the international scene soon thereafter.'' (Idem.)

13. ``In the preface of The Belarus Secret, Loftus laid out a striking piece of information gleaned from his spy network: `Even more disturbing are the records of the Nazi germ warfare scientists who came to America.

They experimented with poison ticks dropped from planes to spread rare diseases. I have received some information suggesting that the U.S. tested some of these poison ticks on the Plum Island artillery range off the coast of Connecticut during the early 1950's. . . .Most of the germ warfare records have been shredded, but there is a top secret U.S. document confirming that `clandestine attacks on crops and animals' took place at this time.'' (Idem.)

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by laserred:
No comments, just following this thread and found this site interesting...I believe when reading it I saw where it stated 'when the (2) boxes of files were opened they were found empty'.

Project PAPERCLIP: www.spitfirelist.com/f480.html

[This message has been edited by laserred (edited 30 March 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
shazdancer
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 1436

Icon 1 posted      Profile for shazdancer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I just wanted to weigh in on a couple of points.

There is plenty of Lyme in Maine, though not as much as in CT. (I was infectd in CT, recently moved to ME.) The YahooGroup for Mainers with Lyme currently numbers 134. There are virtually no LLMDs here, and little knowledge of Lyme in the general population here, so I would guess the undiagnosed, unreported cases are high. They say that Lyme is more prevalent on the coast -- makes sense, aligns with the flight paths of migrating birds.

I agree that Plum Island experimentation MAY have contributed to the spread of TBD, although it did not create the disease. It seems there are many other factors as well. Perhaps shedding light on this connection will help this country wake up to the need for accurate testing, diagnosis, and treatment.

HOWEVER, I think we also have to pick our battles. I would hate to see lots of time and talent wasted on trying to prove the truth of the Plum Island connection, when people are still in more immediate need of help. And screaming about conspiracies is always a good way to not get your message heard.

Regards,
Shaz


Posts: 1558 | From the Berkshires | Registered: Jul 2001  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lisa...with the new homeland security ethos we can't even, as you noted, get information about the tularemia incident.

David Noble was a guy at MIT who was fired for blowing the whistle on connections between academia and the military-industrial complex. He then was going to get a special appt at MacLean, unanimously recommended, and I think, the dean nixxed it.

You *could* make a point finding out how many prominent researchers in what we regard as the old-boy network (those who downplay lyme and downplay longterm abx treatment etc) have links to the military-industrial complex but if David Noble got fired for it, and if its widespread in academia anyway, what makes you think you will get anywhere?

Don't get me wrong I feel the same way you do. I actually think we made virulent bugs and a whole soup of them and then because labs are careless they got out there, and people's lives are ruined as a result. Besides, bacteria exchange genes so it's kind of like genetically engineered corn--which is contaminating organic crops now. Once its out there, if it helps the organism survive, it'll easily 'pollinate' previously less virulent versions.

WHat are we going to do? I'd rather look for an easier cure. Some people DO get much better or well on a few months or years of highlevel meds. But some people still relapse off them. And some people even tho improved are 'never quite the same'. And others can't get better enough no matter what or can't tolerate that amount of meds (like me). I'd rather look for a novel cure. Thats where teh energy should be focussed. Exposing the source, what good does it do? Its out there already and infecting people right and left.


Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by bettyg:
Where is PLUM Island?

Betty G.



Plum Island, NY is off the coast of Long Island. Not far from conn either.
Isnt it neat that the first case of lyme was lyme conn then 1st case stari east coast long Island also 1st case of westnile long Island.

[This message has been edited by treepatrol (edited 31 March 2005).]


Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
treepatrol
Honored Contributor (10K+ posts)
Member # 4117

Icon 1 posted      Profile for treepatrol     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://patft.uspto.gov/n etacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-adv.htm&r=13&f=G&l=50&d=pall&S1=5242820&OS=5242820&RS=5242820

Inventors: Lo; Shyh-Ching (Potomac, MD)

LAB: 257 Plum Island
The Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory

by Michael C Carroll

Nestled near the Hamptons, the fashionable summer playground of America's rich and famous, and in the shadow of New York City, lies an unimposing 840-acre island unidentified on most maps. On the few on which it can be found, Plum Island is marked red or yellow, and stamped U.S. government--restricted or dangerous animal diseases. Though many people live the good life within a scant mile or two from its shores, few know the name of this pork chop-shaped island. Even fewer can say whether it is inhabited, or why it doesn't exist on the map. That's all about to change.

Lab 257: The Disturbing Story of the Government's Secret Plum Island Germ Laboratory blows the lid off the stunning true nature and checkered history of Plum Island. It shows that the seemingly bucolic island on the edge of the largest population center in the United States is a ticking biological time bomb that none of us can safely ignore.

Based on innumerable declassified government documents, scores of in- depth interviews, and access to Plum Island itself, this is an eye- opening, suspenseful account of a federal government germ laboratory gone terribly wrong. For the first time, Lab 257 takes you deep inside this secret world and presents startling revelations including virus outbreaks, biological meltdowns, infected workers who were denied assistance in diagnosis by Plum Island brass, the periodic flushing of contaminated raw sewage into area waters, and the insidious connections between Plum Island, Lyme disease, and the deadly 1999 West Nile virus outbreak.

An exploration of the complex world of microbiology, viruses, and bacteria, Lab 257 also shows how the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which ran Plum Island for the last half century, is far more than wholesome grade-A eggs and the food pyramid. The book probes what's in store for Plum Island's new owner, the Department of Homeland Security, in this age of bioterrorism. And for those interested in questions of national security and safety, it is a call to action for those concerned with protecting present and future generations from preventable biological catastrophes.

Lab 257 will change forever our current understanding of Plum Island - - a place that is, in the words of one insider, "a biological Three Mile Island."
From http://www.canlyme.com/lab257.html

[This message has been edited by treepatrol (edited 04 April 2005).]


Posts: 10564 | From PA Where the Creeks are Red | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It is widespread that medical academia is often biased to the detriment of the patient, by industry, especially Big Pharma.

However, because there has recently been a public fuss about this, and plenty of exposes in the media, some of this is finally beginning to change. (Very slowly, I admit).

NIH recently had to announce they were doing away with their conflicts of interest (which would be like a skunk opting for fragrance-free - we'll believe it when we see it/smell it). But the fact that Dr Zerhouni , the director, felt the need to annoounce this... well, it's a start.

What's different about the Lyme fraud is the role of the military - I dont think thats widespread in other diseases.

You ask what's the use even if we can prove that most of the Steere camp, or "old-boy network" as you called it, are military/biowar types, and you say, isn't it better to look for a cure?

Well, my take is this. Let's assume that the military did some nasty things in the past with some borrelia species. (It's known for a fact that the Japanese expeimented with borrelia genus in WW2, and their personnel were later recruited by the US.)

Given that the military are still dominating the Lyme scene, why should we assume that whatever interest they had in borrelia in the past is now over? Or even, that the only reason they are still there, running the Lyme show, is because they want to cover up some past mistakes and/or deliberate nastiness?

Do you guys and gals not think it is possible that the military (and not just of US) might STILL be interested in borrelia right now, today?

And that work on enhanced virulence, etc, may not just be past work, but ongoing?

Now, if this last scenario is correct, it means that the Steere camp will be controlling the flow of information about this disease, in order to prevent any facts coming out which may hinder or conflict with their perceived goals in any way.

Remember that military scientists have very different priorities to civilian doctors.

If finding a cure conflicts with a military goal, or requires the release of information which the military would rather is hidden, which do you think they will choose?

And if some honest doctor, scientist, lab researcher, Nobel Prize winner etc etc stumbles upon a bit of truth that could potentially help hundreds of thousands of Lymies, but interferes with some nutty general's dream, what do you think they will do?


That's why I say that we need to unseat this evil crew before we can ever make real progress. And exposing them is a start.

Besides, if we dont take notice of who they are and what they are up to, we make bad mistakes, as I said. Like trusting Klempner.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
You *could* make a point finding out how many prominent researchers in what we regard as the old-boy network (those who downplay lyme and downplay longterm abx treatment etc) have links to the military-industrial complex but if David Noble got fired for it, and if its widespread in academia anyway, what makes you think you will get anywhere?

Don't get me wrong I feel the same way you do. I actually think we made virulent bugs and a whole soup of them and then because labs are careless they got out there, and people's lives are ruined as a result. Besides, bacteria exchange genes so it's kind of like genetically engineered corn--which is contaminating organic crops now. Once its out there, if it helps the organism survive, it'll easily 'pollinate' previously less virulent versions.

WHat are we going to do? I'd rather look for an easier cure. Some people DO get much better or well on a few months or years of highlevel meds. But some people still relapse off them. And some people even tho improved are 'never quite the same'. And others can't get better enough no matter what or can't tolerate that amount of meds (like me). I'd rather look for a novel cure. Thats where teh energy should be focussed. Exposing the source, what good does it do? Its out there already and infecting people right and left.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, its true, the bioweaponization goes on, and often openly. I recall an article in New Scientist about a lab in England attempting to make avian viruses jump species, because, supposedly, if we can do it nature can do it so we'd better try to do it and then be prepared. Nice reasoning.

Are you well?
If not, better to try and figure out a way to cure this quickly and easily, not without all this sturm and drang people go through.

I'm not sure what that way is but I have some ideas. I prefer to pursue those, with nutraceutical and pharmaceutical companies, rather than try to stop this big machinery. But I wish you well .


Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Aligondo Bruce
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6219

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Aligondo Bruce     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I don't think it's as simple as an accident at plum island.

You make a good point about people wasting time and energy screaming about plum island connections.

However, governmental malfeasance or intentional coverup for various reasons may help explain the pervasive beyond reason denials and scientific misconduct which has been perpetrated by steerites and government officials with regard to lyme disease.


Some of these steerites are quite vicious human beings. Recognizing the governments inability to regulate their actions because to do so would be to acknowledge certain truths about LD which would be damaging to the government and other entities, these creatures are in every sense of the phrase foxes guarding the henhouse.

Migratory patterns of birds does not serve to adequately explain the increased prevalence of LD in certain areas.

Very important flyways in other parts of the country are virtually devoid of Bb s.s. Bb is not seen in wintering grounds of many of the east coast migratories, even though it has been demonstrated that migration stress activates Borrelia infection, for instance.

Deer population density is correlated with Bb prevalence, but this is also not an answer in and of itself because there are heavy populations of deer in other parts of the country (even corresponding with migratory flyways) that have low Bb seropositivity.

I think it is more climatological. Bb s.s. infected ticks are most common in a certain type of environment containing deciduous trees, leaf litter, decent humidity, etc. The presence of deer is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

However we must not forget that there are species such as B. lonestari which are found in ticks in different environments possibly adapting cycle of infection to warmer and drier conditions. Not much is known about lonestari or other as yet undiscovered spirochetes.

I believe that our government should take strong action to reduce and/or eliminate the deer population especially in the US east of the rockies. Say, back to 1900 levels. When we still had the passenger pigeon.

quote:
Originally posted by shazdancer:
I just wanted to weigh in on a couple of points.

There is plenty of Lyme in Maine, though not as much as in CT. (I was infectd in CT, recently moved to ME.) The YahooGroup for Mainers with Lyme currently numbers 134. There are virtually no LLMDs here, and little knowledge of Lyme in the general population here, so I would guess the undiagnosed, unreported cases are high. They say that Lyme is more prevalent on the coast -- makes sense, aligns with the flight paths of migrating birds.

I agree that Plum Island experimentation MAY have contributed to the spread of TBD, although it did not create the disease. It seems there are many other factors as well. Perhaps shedding light on this connection will help this country wake up to the need for accurate testing, diagnosis, and treatment.

HOWEVER, I think we also have to pick our battles. I would hate to see lots of time and talent wasted on trying to prove the truth of the Plum Island connection, when people are still in more immediate need of help. And screaming about conspiracies is always a good way to not get your message heard.

Regards,
Shaz



Posts: 523 | From Stillwater,OK,USA | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paisley
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6502

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Paisley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think that anyone who has truly suffered with lyme disease would say that SOMETHING JUST ISN'T RIGHT. That something is a COVER-UP. To think otherwise would be one just one more insult to our intelligence.

The whole process stinks and it just doesn't make sense. From diagnosis to Treatment to Politics to Ignorance. LD/West Nile/AIDS all hitting so hard in the past 30+ years...coincidental? These are not just bacterias and viruses - they are SMART....as though they have been evolutionized (probably not a real word).

I agree with Lymerayja (p.s. I was there as a visitor). The question now is what CAN we do as a group?


Posts: 298 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you for your good wishes.

I am less ill than most Lymies I know, so yes, I have the energy to fight the Steere camp. I am more fortunate than most Lymies in that respect.

In other respects, less fortunate.

Maybe my motivation is higher than some others, because the Steere camp have taken from me something more important to me than my own life. And left me with no choice but to spend every ounce of energy and every spare minute fighting them.

I would much rather sit at home and bake cookies and wash clothes and wrap birthday presents.

But by the looks of things, it seems, the Steere camp prefer to have me engaged in studying their connections with biological warfare, Kaiser Permanente and Glaxo SmithKline.

Their choice, not mine.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
Yes, its true, the bioweaponization goes on, and often openly. I recall an article in New Scientist about a lab in England attempting to make avian viruses jump species, because, supposedly, if we can do it nature can do it so we'd better try to do it and then be prepared. Nice reasoning.

Are you well?
If not, better to try and figure out a way to cure this quickly and easily, not without all this sturm and drang people go through.

I'm not sure what that way is but I have some ideas. I prefer to pursue those, with nutraceutical and pharmaceutical companies, rather than try to stop this big machinery. But I wish you well .



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Keep us posted, Lisa.

We all have our different talents, strategies etc. For me, it's sooo much unecessary suffering. Reading Rebecca Well's story (ya ya sisterhood)--7 years of agony. Now she's grateful to be able to fricken WALK to her desk. She will be on antibiotics and antimalarials for years, I'm assuming. Amy Tan is 90% better, that's great, I will feel most reassured when she gets off abx and stays well.

Why should anyone have to be on all these toxic drugs for years?

So my thinking is, let's find something that works. It really isn't that pie in the sky, its just notbody is focussing on it. I see a recent news item that a new and upcoming antifungal is proving both nontoxic and effective in chagas' disease which is about as bad as lyme and prevalent in south america and kills people through cardiac problems.

If somebody would put some research into lyme like this either existing drugs or new drugs would prove effective. Maybe even novel nutraceuticals. So I am pursuing two avenues. I don't think either one is at all unlikely to work, its just getting people interested. I have one place interested in making what I suggested. I haven't contacted the other, a pharma, but I will when I get a chance. They are making other novel products for common deadly infections.


Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I wish you the best of luck, oxygenbabe too, with the direction you are pursuing.

However, I can't help but feel that perhaps for a large number of people, there ALREADY is an answer but they won't let those who could benefit have it or know about it.

There have been cases of spontaneous remission or even apparent cure, which suggests that it might not be so difficult for medicine to effect this, if only the physiological mechanism causing the disappearance of symptoms was known.

Or if only the honest clinicians studying what they see in their patients, and the honest lab scientists, agricultural researchers etc could be permitted to do their work without fear of persecution.

The military would not be so stupid as to weaponise something when they had no antidote.

Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by oxygenbabe:
Keep us posted, Lisa.

We all have our different talents, strategies etc. For me, it's sooo much unecessary suffering. Reading Rebecca Well's story (ya ya sisterhood)--7 years of agony. Now she's grateful to be able to fricken WALK to her desk. She will be on antibiotics and antimalarials for years, I'm assuming. Amy Tan is 90% better, that's great, I will feel most reassured when she gets off abx and stays well.

Why should anyone have to be on all these toxic drugs for years?

So my thinking is, let's find something that works. It really isn't that pie in the sky, its just notbody is focussing on it. I see a recent news item that a new and upcoming antifungal is proving both nontoxic and effective in chagas' disease which is about as bad as lyme and prevalent in south america and kills people through cardiac problems.

If somebody would put some research into lyme like this either existing drugs or new drugs would prove effective. Maybe even novel nutraceuticals. So I am pursuing two avenues. I don't think either one is at all unlikely to work, its just getting people interested. I have one place interested in making what I suggested. I haven't contacted the other, a pharma, but I will when I get a chance. They are making other novel products for common deadly infections.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
oxygenbabe
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 5831

Icon 1 posted      Profile for oxygenbabe     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
You might be right. I have speculated on that privately but it's too evil to consider: that they'd bioweaponize something, have the cure, and let this many people suffer. In any case, the cure is not available to us at this point.
Posts: 2276 | From united states | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:
These are not just bacterias and viruses - they are SMART....as though they have been evolutionized (probably not a real word).

I agree with Lymerayja (p.s. I was there as a visitor). The question now is what CAN we do as a group?


I will ask around and see how many people would be interested in forming a group to study these things, with a view to doing something practical with the information. If others can also scout around and see who else is interested, we may get the critical mass we need for a group.
Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
doctor
Junior Member
Member # 7128

Icon 1 posted      Profile for doctor     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by daniella:
I am appauled!!! I am reading it now....

The lyme chapter is what really peeved me. These co-infections are all native to other countries, not ours.

Lyme disease was even only a bacteria found in Europe. But it became a problem here shortly after the government was experimenting with infected ticks on Plum island. a german ex nazi headed up the Plum island experiments on infected ticks.

I think if this information is accurate it should warrent legal action...for infecting us..

You guys have any input...Is the book factualy accurate?

I think copies should be sent to all the senators to read. THEY them selves should read it NOT their aides.

I had heard about this book from numerous people and suspected it was interesting...but...onceI actually started it MYSELF...I am appauled and scared because I live so close to Plum island....

daniella

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]

[This message has been edited by daniella (edited 28 March 2005).]


Hi Daniella, you are correct about the book lab 257. If you want to read a real horror story you need to get a copy of the 95th congress.
This book is titled
BIOLOGICAL TESTING ON HUMAN SUBJECTS, hearing before the subcommittee on health and scientific research of the committee on human resorces united states senate. 95th congress, first session. They talk about infecting many bugs and seeing how fast and far they can spread. No one can dispute what I am saying. Then the 91 congress talks about $10 million to make a disease that destroys your immune system, has no cure and is fatal.I wonder what the name of this illness would be? I am glad you posted this. It's time we stoped hiding from it. For the people that say our Government would never do this, remember AGENT ORANGE.
Another good book to read is the 95th Congress titled Human drug testing by the CIA. first session S.1893. These test were done on the unwilling people. One of the test was called MK ULTRA. This was for mind controll. You know, LSD and other stuff.This list goes on for ever. Thanks for this post.


Posts: 1 | From USA | Registered: Apr 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Greatcod
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It seems to me the next step is to move
the Lyme Biowar idea from the possibile to the plausable in the public mind.I believe that the publication and success of "Lab 257" lifted the idea above the "conspiracy fringe" level.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Mo
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 2863

Icon 3 posted      Profile for Mo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 

Somewhat related:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bioterror/biow_popov.html

Posts: 8337 | From the other shore | Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 14 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Mo:

Somewhat related:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bioterror/biow_popov.html

Thanks for posting this, Mo. I'd read part of this before, but it's really interesting to go back and read the whole.

The link concerns Sergei Popov, an old Soviet biowarman who now works for the US. Here are some bits of the interview which IMO are especially interesting:

"[There were] multiple levels of secrecy -- so that some people didn't know anything about the true direction of research. Some people knew just the so-called "closed legend," which was specially prepared information for those people and for the outside world."

Hmmmmm. Is the science published by Steere, Barbour, Klempner et al (all of whom have elite military background in Infectious Disease), and endorsed by the bioweapons men at NIH (McSweegan, Baker) and CDC just a "closed legend" for us?

Popov describes how scientists who were involved in a research project THEMSELVES would have no idea of the true goal of the research. We can imagine men and women working away on studying the virulence determinants of a particular microbe, believeing they are doing research to protect people, when in fact the results of their research are intended to be used to make weapons of mass destruction that will kill young and old alike (or mass incapacitation).

Look at this bit:
"Initially I was involved in the production of synthetic genes. That means we created in tubes, in vitro, [gene] constructs that did not exist in nature.

"The hope was, making those constructs, it would be possible to provide bacterial agents and viruses completely new properties which they did not have in natural conditions.

"So, for example, a virus could produce something absolutely difficult to imagine in natural circumstances, like peptides which destroy the immune system in a very special way."

I'm not sure I even want to think about what that means. And I'm sure it was not only the Soviets who were working on these things.

"My most successful research was the finding that a bacteria called Legionella could be modified in such a way that it could induce severe nervous system disease. And the symptoms of nervous disorders [similar to those of multiple sclerosis] would appear several days after the bacterial disease was completely "cured." So there would be no bacterial agent, but symptoms -- new and unusual symptoms -- would appear several days later.

NOVA: What would be the point of that?

Popov: Imagine a new weapon which is difficult to diagnose initially and then which is impossible to treat with conventional antibiotics. That would be [a good weapon] from the point of view of [masking] who originated the problem."

Or a weapon which can be treated with conventional antibiotics, but only if these are administered immediately after the tickbite, and in a strong enough dose and duration.

But the Steere camp have always been resistant to treating on tick attachment, and some of them have gone to extraordinary lengths to convince us not to.


Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Greatcod
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Brave New World of recombinant biowarfare offers the posibility of not just killing folks, but of blinding, deafening, sterilizing, cripling and incapacitating them mentally..and not just with the big hitters like anthrax and ebola,
but by modifying the common cold viruses and everyday bacteria..the work Popov refers to was in the Soviet Union 20 years ago. What might the biowarriors have now?

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
daniella
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6753

Icon 12 posted      Profile for daniella     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Wow, that was twenty years ago......and in Russia......makes you really wonder...

You guys have a wealth of info on this stuff. Very interesting to read...

daniella


Posts: 968 | From private | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Greatcod
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Anything I know is in the public domain. Popov was on Nova, on PBS, and on the same program was this Bill Patrick, who is an old Ft. Detrick guy. He was smiling as he tossed make believe bio-chem weapons into the air, pointing out how important the wind strenght was in geting results. He was the guy who first pointed out how effective a litle anthrax could be if delievered thru the mail (he was in no way implicated in the actual release)..A reasonable guy, doing his job. All this recombinant and genomic biology has its good side, but its very, very complex, way beyond me. If you're doing biowar, you really don't have to be concerned about side effects, which is a big problem in making medically useful stuff. It is all sort of like Stephen King gets his own BSL4 lab, and going from there.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paisley
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6502

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Paisley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Does anyone ever wonder....

is lyme disease (and other "new" chronic debilitating illnesses) part of population control?


Out of 11 people in our family 8 of us are very ill...coincidence? My sister and I used to kind of joke around ...wondering how many handicap car plates one family can have.

I had a few laughs back then because we had always made fun of ourselves and our dysfunctional family, as a way to cope with the pain, but it seemed so odd that one family could get so many illnesses.

that was before I knew I had chronic lyme and had unknowingly passed it on to my children.

...that was before I knew what I know now.

since my re-diagnosis I have followed the bread crumb trails.

the CDC told me I was CURED back in '85.

I started to ask my self...how is that all of the drs. that I saw for 20 years missed this ? How could all of the endocrinologists, infectious disease drs, rheumatologists, neurologists, orthopedics, general practioners NEVER diagnosis me with this glaring cluster of symptoms?

I feel like the stupid head now. I put all of my faith in the wrong place.


Posts: 298 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:
Does anyone ever wonder....

is lyme disease (and other "new" chronic debilitating illnesses) part of population control?


Lyme, dislike AIDS, is rarely fatal. in fact the opposite unintended consequences fall here.

a population that is ill can not work hence it is not a taxable source of income (the pre-eminant reason for the state institution).

furthermore an ill population, or minority there of, is a human capital (comprosing economic, military and civil) drain on society as a whole.

quote:
Out of 11 people in our family 8 of us are very ill...coincidence?

that is unfortunate, my condolenses, but that is surely not the norm.

while we have many new diseases in our advanced, evolved world human kind has also eradicated, or come close to eradicating, many petulant diseases that were not controllable before, i.e. polio.

we have also extended by major leaps both the world birth expentancy and death rates (in the great majority of countries anyhow).

a century ago if you had 11 people in your family a quarter of them probably would not have lived to see 25 and the oldest probably wouldn't have passed 70.

life exptancy in the 1900 US census was 47.3 years, the 2000 US census had it at 76.9 years.

that increase is with the population tripling in the 20th century despite the included calculating in of two world wars worth of casualties, Vietnam, the toll of AIDS, rising coronary disease (often dependent on lifestyle), cancer (age & industrialized atmosphere) and automobile deaths.

to wax philosophic and anthropologic...

... the fact that human beings exist at all in a world made up of billions of particles of bacteria, viruses and fungi is in fact the greatest evolutionary achievement of all.

in a perfect world not only would humans exist, but they/we would all exist both healthy and happy. unfortunately we are far from a utopian universe.

but to argue that we are more ill as a world population today than yesteryear, the centuries or millenia before now is ludicrous.

there are much more simple explanations than far reaching conspiracy theories, not that there isn't nefarous and dubious ongoings often a foot but they can neither be quantified or qualified.

to do otherwise is like counting your chickens before they hatch without ever even having seen a chickencoop.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 04 April 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Corinne E
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 4670

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Corinne E     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Have a gander at these two sites:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25220+
http://nucnews.net/nucnews/2002nn/0210nn/021007nn.htm#305

A very interesting read.

Corinne


Posts: 461 | From Abbotsford, BC, Canada | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
by the way i hope you guys aren't getting your 'reliable' info from the same intelligence sources that have claimed for a decade that Iraq had nuclear and chemical weapons beyond any reasonable doubt.

"a slam dunk!" george tenet whispered with enthusiasm.

even Iraqi insiders and ex-nationals said that in addition to the Americans, British, Dutch, Spanish, Italians, Isrealis, Jordanians, Saudis...........

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 04 April 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Paisley
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6502

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Paisley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Zip,

Based on experience, I have to vehemently disagree with your first statement that lyme is rarely fatal. Having had three life-threatening brain infections due to lyme, with the last being a near-death experience, no one will ever be able to tell me that lyme isn't fatal. I know it is. I lived it, died it, and lived it again.

The word that one could use to sidetrack others from this truth would be RARE. But, how is anyone who really has lyme and dilivers that message helping the cause. Basically, you are saying, ``oh, it's not that seriouse.'' Are you kidding me. My sister-in-law, who has HIV and was close to death is doing better than I am. She is living a full life. The research dollars have gone to her cause.

There are more casualties due to lyme complications than anyone is even aware of, because no one has been tracking this...perhaps because no one cares about these statistics? How many deaths from cardiovascular disease are actually due to lyme? I wonder how many suicides, especially the teen population since the numbers are so staggering, actually had lyme disease. The suicide rates for teens parallels the increase in lyme disease - the fastests growing infectious disease in the world. I'm sure there could be many other factors for the suicides, however, until someone recognizes this hidden gem, the statistics won't be available. Since lyme hits so many organ systems - how does any one know that John Doe's kidney failure wasn't really due to lyme.

WE have been denied the truth. I won't hear otherwise. The CDC personally delivered my original diagnosis and told me I was cured after my recommended treatment. They have known these past 20 years that I have had lyme. If they were going to contact me because they were afraid I might have Hep. C because of a blood transfusion, why not mention that by the way, you might still have lyme based on what we know to date.


You mentioned philosophy

Well my thoughts reflect certain philosophical, spiritual and theologian stances as well. However, my opinion just comes from woman's intuition and experience. I can tell you with the utmost confidence that I didn't go to more than 100 doctors and world-renowned specialists in the country for 20 years...and they just all happened to MISS the fact that I had lyme...even when I listed that I had lyme back in `85. No one will ever convince me that was an oops.

the fact that you don't want to look at any of this as conspiracy.....is a red flag for me. You seem a bit too casual about the whole thing.

Mark my words. We are going to see many more WHOLE families being devastated by this disease.

You can argue that this all this disease is doing is producing ``human capital societal drain'' While that fact is true, it still doesn't preclude people from dying from this disease. You can't deny that some people with this disease are not getting the treatment they need to make them well. Honestly, we both know these individuals aren't going to just get better without proper threatment. So what direction do you think they are going to go in?

It's like those with HIV or AIDs....they are not just worried about the virus, they need to be cautious about the opportunistic infections.

You mentioned that a century ago a quarter of my family would be gone. That statement has no merit here. Again, are you kidding me? Who are you trying to persuade of what with this kind of argument. These are SUDDEN influences affecting our health in the past 20-30 years. AND, we know that the governments have the patents on these.


From another post of mine: I think that anyone who has truly suffered with lyme disease would say that SOMETHING JUST ISN'T RIGHT. That something is a COVER-UP. To think otherwise would be one just one more insult to our intelligence.

The whole process stinks and it just doesn't make sense. From diagnosis to Treatment to Politics to Ignorance. LD/West Nile/AIDS all hitting so hard in the past 30+ years...coincidental? These are not just bacterias and viruses - they are SMART....as though they have been evolutionized (probably not a real word).


Whatever.



Posts: 298 | Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Greatcod
Unregistered


Icon 1 posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The reality, of course, is that physicians and scientists are just like everybody else,
and can use their knowledge in healthy or destructive ways. Most commonly these days,
they withhold information that would allow consumers to make informed decisions, or refuse to stand up to govermental and cooperate abuses of public health. Many are gutless careerests--read Sinclair Lewis's
"Arrowsmith" --its been going on for a while now.
Perhaps Popov, Alibek and Patrick are liars;
murderous and maiming medical science doesn't exist. On the other hand, the Soviets covered up their antrax getaway in 1979. Agent Orange was "all in their heads". The truth is I don't know, and that you don't know. The Lyme biowar hypothesis
is unproven-so is much of what Steere has claimed as a "medical scientist". The idea is to validate or invalidate theories; to be simply dismissive is moronic however well it plays in graduate school.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:

The word that one could use to sidetrack others from this truth would be RARE. But, how is anyone who really has lyme and dilivers that message helping the cause

the cause?

you don't help any cause by exaggerating the truth. i have heard of at least 4 to 5 people who's spouses believed they have family members that died from cardiovascular problems from Lyme disease.

of course it's serious, of course it happens. but to put Lyme disease on the same level as AIDS is ridiculous.

there are tens of millions of people dying globally from AIDS. and you think Lyme is equatable on the mortality level as that?

furthermore Lyme, in the chronic in addition to the acute stage can be treatable, though there are many failures. AIDS, though some people do fairly well, is an uphill battle to the grave for 95%.

quote:
WE have been denied the truth. I won't hear otherwise.

in otherwords your mind is made up and you are going to believe what you want to believe regardless of anything said by anyone (unless of course they agree with you).

so i have no point in advancing a dead conversation then.

by the way philosophy is never intutition.

and as far as smart viruses there is no reason to believe that they are more likely to be made in lab than by nature itself.

nature is in a constant battle, as our weapons against disease get stronger, the diseases in turn get stronger so that they can live and flourish as well.

that is evolution.

quote:
The whole process stinks and it just doesn't make sense. From diagnosis to Treatment to Politics to Ignorance.

that we can easily agree upon.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 04 April 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:
[B]Does anyone ever wonder....

is lyme disease (and other "new" chronic debilitating illnesses) part of population control?
..B]


I don't really think Lyme was worked on by the bioweaponeers for population control, although it's true that some of the culprits have roots that trace back to eugenicist organisations, and of course the Nazis like Traub were all about eliminating "bad" races.

IMO it was more likely they were interested in its properties as an incapacitant.

Producing a huge range of symptoms, not showing up on routine tests, evading the immune system and possible combining with co-infections - what could be better for totally baffling the doctors of the target group?

Borrelia aside, tick-borne disease has ALWAYS been of great interest to the military (tularemia, Q fever, Crimean-congo haemorrhagic fever etc etc)

Lisa

Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It is terrible to hear that your whole family has been affected in this way, but also not really surprising.

A LLMD told me that he personally knew at least 100 families where multiple members had come down with Lyme.

The Steere camp are STILL playing down and even denying altogether the risk of passing Lyme to the unborn child even today!

For instance that deranged Dr McSweegan with his "Quackwatch" disinformation site.

And despite the fact that Steere himself once admitted that Lyme can be acquired congenitally in a published paper, and Dr Wilske (Steere camp leading lady in Europe) autopsied a stillborn baby of a Lyme mother and found borrelia.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by Paisley:

Out of 11 people in our family 8 of us are very ill...coincidence? My sister and I used to kind of joke around ...wondering how many handicap car plates one family can have.

I had a few laughs back then because we had always made fun of ourselves and our dysfunctional family, as a way to cope with the pain, but it seemed so odd that one family could get so many illnesses.

that was before I knew I had chronic lyme and had unknowingly passed it on to my children.

...that was before I knew what I know now.

since my re-diagnosis I have followed the bread crumb trails.

the CDC told me I was CURED back in '85.

I started to ask my self...how is that all of the drs. that I saw for 20 years missed this ? How could all of the endocrinologists, infectious disease drs, rheumatologists, neurologists, orthopedics, general practioners NEVER diagnosis me with this glaring cluster of symptoms?

I feel like the stupid head now. I put all of my faith in the wrong place.



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually, I think we should stay away from those sites you mentioned, because if you take a closer look, the people involved in them are basically some kind of crazy racist extremists.


The article about anthrax contains some true information, but also mixes in some complete nonsense, eg it states that Germany had almost no biological/chemical programme (?) in WW2 because Hitler couldn't bear to use gases???!!!!

Oh common, what the hell was Auschwitz?

Also, we now know, thanks to the leaks from the intelligence community that John Loftus got hold of, that Hitler very much DID have a biowar programme, and its head ,Erich Traub, was recruited by the US to train up staff in OPEN AIR experiments on Plum Island with tick pathogens.

No disrespect to you, but we do have to be very careful and critical in where we look for our sources of information. If you go on the homepage of the worldnet site, you'll see it's all about blaming immigrants for the problems of America and setting up vigilante groups against them.

This is racist crap. After all, the whole of America is immigrants except for the Native Americans, and the same with the "indigenous" foreigner-hating British who forget they themselves are all descended from Scandinavians, Frenchmen and other foreign ethnic groups.

But seriously, we do need to beware. There IS a lot of crap out there, and the neo-nazis and some bizarre extremist cult groups are out there trying to jump on the bandwagon, talking about Lyme and biowarfare too.


IMO we have to use only watertight evidence from the most reliable, and verifiable sources, otherwise we will be laughed as conspiracy theorists.

And in fact Greatcod is right, much of the information proving the biowar, insurance and other corrupt corporate connections of the Steere camp are right out there in the public domain, where anyone can find it, because they've never hidden it very well. There's no need for us to consult any of these crazy neonazi or cultist groups.

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by Corinne E:
Have a gander at these two sites:

Corinne


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Look zipzap, this wonderful rosy picture of progess you're painting is false.

Yes, we have raised longevity and got rid of many old infectious scourges in the west, but we have turned the ex Soviet Union, which used to have a life expectancy like the west's, into a semi-third-world environment where men live to 56. (And that's not a plug for the old Soviet regime, just a statement of fact.)

In 1918 a terrible flu strain killed more people than the First World War, now a crazy NIH ex-Lyme program officer and biowarman wants to dig up the corpses to isolate the strain.

We could probably sort out the problems of the Third World easily but instead we (or rather, our multinational big Pharma corporations), make them pay through the nose for AIDS drugs they cannot afford so any progress in the west passes them by.

Same for the unnecessary millions of deaths from preventable disease, starvation and malnutrition. Our great genetic advances are used to develop sterile strains of grain that cross-pollinate and wipe out natural strains, so that subsistence farmers have to spend their last penny to buy more seed each year, till they owe their soul and their mother to the company store.

What I'm saying is that greed and the obsession with profit has often perverted science into something used to destroy life rather than improve it, and its worse than ever today, because molecular genetics has opened up so many new and horrifying possibiities.

You may feel it's a great achievement that humans exist at all in a world of billions of microbes, but only humans are daft enough to engineer those microbes to create forms that NEVER existed in nature, that could extinguish every human on earth.

Even those microbes that parasitise and kill humans, don't really want to wipe out us all out, as they would then lose their host. We are the only species daft enough to do it to ourselves.

Or rather, we have among us evil individuals who would mess with genetically engineered bioweapons and imagine they could control them. They would even kid us that it for "defense", and that the ability to wipe out or incapacitate millions of civilians is part of "defense".

If the rest of us are daft enough to sit back and do nothing, then we will make ourselves extinct.

No Zipzup, you can keep repeating that we should ignore "conspiracy theories" as much as you like, but when people present verifiable facts and solid eveidence, that is no longer "conspiracy theories" , but a scandal that will be exposed.

Sooner rather than later. In England a Conservative politician (and I am NOT plugging that part at all) had a flood of doctors and nurses ringing him up, after his name appeared in a Lyme article in the press, to tell him that they have long had reason to believe there is a Lyme coverup, but were too frightened to talk about it.

No Zippy, the genie is further and further out of the bottle every day, and you can tell that to your ILADS-hating and LymeNet-hating friend Weisman on sci-med too.

Would you like to re-instate Richard Nixon as President, Zippy?

After all, Watergate was just a "conspiracy theory", right?

Lisa

quote:
Originally posted by zipzip:
...
while we have many new diseases in our advanced, evolved world human kind has also eradicated, or come close to eradicating, many petulant diseases that were not controllable before, i.e. polio.

we have also extended by major leaps both the world birth expentancy and death rates (in the great majority of countries anyhow).

a century ago if you had 11 people in your family a quarter of them probably would not have lived to see 25 and the oldest probably wouldn't have passed 70.

life exptancy in the 1900 US census was 47.3 years, the 2000 US census had it at 76.9 years.

that increase is with the population tripling in the 20th century despite the included calculating in of two world wars worth of casualties, Vietnam, the toll of AIDS, rising coronary disease (often dependent on lifestyle), cancer (age & industrialized atmosphere) and automobile deaths.

to wax philosophic and anthropologic...

... the fact that human beings exist at all in a world made up of billions of particles of bacteria, viruses and fungi is in fact the greatest evolutionary achievement of all.

in a perfect world not only would humans exist, but they/we would all exist both healthy and happy. unfortunately we are far from a utopian universe.

but to argue that we are more ill as a world population today than yesteryear, the centuries or millenia before now is ludicrous.

there are much more simple explanations than far reaching conspiracy theories, not that there isn't nefarous and dubious ongoings often a foot but they can neither be quantified or qualified.

to do otherwise is like counting your chickens before they hatch without ever even having seen a chickencoop.

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 04 April 2005).]



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
zipzip
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6226

Icon 1 posted      Profile for zipzip     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Originally posted by Lymerayja:
quote:
Yes, we have raised longevity and got rid of many old infectious scourges in the west, but we have turned the ex Soviet Union, which used to have a life expectancy like the west's, into a semi-third-world environment where men live to 56. (And that's not a plug for the old Soviet regime, just a statement of fact.)

russia has no one to blame but its own oligarchy.

quote:
We could probably sort out the problems of the Third World easily but instead we (or rather, our multinational big Pharma corporations), make them pay through the nose for AIDS drugs they cannot afford so any progress in the west passes them by....

while that is mostly true it is nearsighted to suggest that the lack of progressive work on part of the African Union, and the clientalism of its shady governments don't share a very large part of the blame.

Africa on the most part is a feudel kingdom.

quote:
What I'm saying is that greed and the obsession with profit has often perverted science into something used to destroy life rather than improve it, and its worse than ever today, because molecular genetics has opened up so many new and horrifying possibiities.

do you want to take on Lyme disease or completey reform the entire way of modern life including the current form of governmental institutions and pro-growth private capitalism?

i'm all for sustainability and a more equitable distribution of wealth and services but it would take a multitude of decades to even put in the parternship for the framework.

the world is not rosy, and it is not as equally vile.

it is dependent on individual human actions and subsequent to centuries of developing norms, human habits and differing philosophies.

equality has been a fight ongoing for centuries, it will not change in a fortnight.

still, with all our problems and discrepancies amongst each other, humans have more personal freedom today that any other time since the beginning of modern civilization more than 2000 years ago.

your over simplification of geo-politics is mired in a naive romanticism.

quote:
If the rest of us are daft enough to sit back and do nothing, then we will make ourselves extinct.
.

and why is that such a bad thing? if humans were gone life on earth would flourish like it hasn't in millenia.

but i have never said do nothing.

on the contrary, i have said if you are going to do something, do it with thought, prudency, respect and probably most importantly, do it coherently.

... not with wild eyed fancy and illusory.

say someone "blew the lid off" of Lyme disease and it was common knowlegde that it was created as a bio-terror weapon.

would people still be diagnosed quicker?

would the serology of the tests be better? would it be commonly accepted amongst doctors that chronic nueroborreliosis exist?

would insurance companies start covering IV antibiotics without hinderance.

most assuredly no, no and no.

the first, borrelia as a concerted bioweapon, and the second, borrelia as a persistant and easily acquired disease, are not mutually inclusive.

quote:
Would you like to re-instate Richard Nixon as President, Zippy?

After all, Watergate was just a "conspiracy theory", right?


watergate, unlike plum island, et all, has been corroborated & proven beyond any doubt, so it is hardly a theory. hence it is hardly a conspiracy in the sense that it is uncertifiable.

rather watergate (which is an ugly hotel) was a conspiracy in the sense that it was a conspired scheme.

... not that i can even see how watergate is apropos of parallel reasoning to purport the argument for bioterror weapons and their involvement in the rise in population of borrelia infection in the human host.

so obviously any reference to richard nixon in this discussion is a distraction meant to be an ad hominem attack.

to get back to the discussion at hand.... i have never said unequivocally that there is no conspiracies involving Lyme...

but they are concerning gross misrepresentation of the proliferation and manifestation of the disease (which is apparent) than development of governmental-military bioterror weapons that have never been seen (as per my Iraq example given previously).

again it comes back to corroboration, credibility and logical analysis.

as liegner wrote the fight for Lyme is "the sensible pursuit of answers", with emphasis certainly on 'sensible'.

http://www.lymeinfo.net/sensiblepursuit.html

[This message has been edited by zipzip (edited 04 April 2005).]


Posts: 795 | From nyc | Registered: Sep 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Corinne E
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 4670

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Corinne E     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lisa,

I didn't fully read the 2 web sites I posted, just a line about Grosse Isle and biowarfare tests. I can't read much or clearly anything much right now. Had cataract removed in right eye 2 weeks ago, and will have cataract in left removed eye sometime in summer. Not only is my brain and head in a fog right, but my body is not cooperating either. I also have low-angle glaucoma in both eyes, all caused by lyme, or so my LLMD says.

I will be more careful in the future about what I post.

Corinne


Posts: 461 | From Abbotsford, BC, Canada | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Corinne, it's ok, I wasn't accusing you of anything. I was just issuing a general warning, as it is very easy to be fooled by some of these sites.

I would not be surprised if some of those crazy neonazi sites were actually set up by the military intelligence top brass themselves, to discredit serious people who want to expose this thing with facts, and to divert blame for the evil they have done on to traditional scapegoats like Jews, Latinos etc.

Lisa


quote:
Originally posted by Corinne E:
Lisa,

I didn't fully read the 2 web sites I posted, just a line about Grosse Isle and biowarfare tests. I can't read much or clearly anything much right now. Had cataract removed in right eye 2 weeks ago, and will have cataract in left removed eye sometime in summer. Not only is my brain and head in a fog right, but my body is not cooperating either. I also have low-angle glaucoma in both eyes, all caused by lyme, or so my LLMD says.

I will be more careful in the future about what I post.

Corinne



Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Lymerayja
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 6839

Icon 8 posted      Profile for Lymerayja     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Zippy, given that we are discussing bioweapons on this thread, I don't find your jokes about life being better on earth without the human race very funny.

Or maybe you were not joking?

Look zippy, I don't want to get all off-topic and start a big debate about Russia and Africa. So I'll just say yes, I'm aware that there are vicious, greedy homegrown regimes that oppress their populations in both places, but in the latter case many were
installed and/or backed by the west and as for the case of the Russian oligarchs, all were. Now back to Lyme.

You say we should do things with prudence coherence, and "respect" etc. Fine.

But respect for whom? Not for the Steere camp, I hope?

You say, if the lid was blown off the biowarfare side of the Lyme conspiracy, how would it help people get diagnosis?

Well, with the lid blown off, we discredit all those who have been an OBSTACLE to diagnosis for an unknown, but likely STAGGERING number of people, who have been left to suffer needlessly and agonisingly for years.

Over-represented among that number: children.

You see, if it can be demonstrated that the majority of the Steere camp have known conflicts of interest with military biowarfare goals and/or greedy corporations (and you bet your momma it can), then we can demonstrate that the opinion of these researchers should be flushed down the toilet.

Along with the researchers themselves. (Ideally in those designer toilets Tincup suggested, each with the portrait of a leading Steere camp member etched on the bowl).

Unseat that corrupt Steere crew, and you give breathing space to genuine doctors and scientists who are studying borrelia because they want to ALLEVIATE SUFFERING, not create the world's most effective incapacitant, give value for money to insurance companies that pay them, or satisfy a paymaster trying to launch an unsafe vaccine etc etc.

And just out of interest, did you ever take the Lymerix vaccine Zip?

Unseat the Steere gangsters, and you open the door to REAL SCIENCE and hence to proper diagnosis, better testing, and effective treatment.

Yes we most certainly CAN force insurance companies to pay for needed treatment if our legislative efforts are accompanied by a mass political campaign.

And by that I DO NOT mean backing this or that party, because they're all up to their necks in it. I mean by our own patient protest actions, to accompany published exposes of the facts.

My point about Watergate, and asking you if you felt Nixon should be re-instated, was to show you that at some point, Watergate was also, technically, a "conspiracy theory". If people had shut their minds off in a knee-jerk response as you are doing, it would never have been exposed.

Yes Watergate has been proven by fact, but much of what we're saying has too.

For example, Klempner HAS been a biowarfare man for years, and much of the Steere camp roll-call reads like a Who's who in the Epidemic Intelligence Service (elite military Infectious Disease unit originally set up by the biowarmen in the McCarthy period, when it was legal, OFFICIAL POLICY to create offensive bioweapons.)

That's all easy to prove with material that's long been publicly available, often without even needing to do FOIA requests.

In the UK the military stuff has been leaking like a sieve.

You talk about "bioweapons that have never been seen". How do you "see" a bioweapon?

How do you know when you walk into a room where a 12 year old child has a PICC line in because he can no longer remember his ABC, is too tired to stand up, is screaming from a headache that can't be relieved by painkillers etc, how do you know that it's NOT a bioweapon you're looking at?

Especially when you see it reduce a 250 pound ex-wrestler to the same state?

Ken Alibek (former top Soviet biowarfareman, later recruited by the US), said some interesting things. He said that the biggest problem with preventing an escape or attack involving bioweapons, is that:

"We don't know whether or not we've already had one".

Hmmmmmm.

Lisa


Posts: 284 | From UK | Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.