LymeNet Home LymeNet Home Page LymeNet Flash Discussion LymeNet Support Group Database LymeNet Literature Library LymeNet Legal Resources LymeNet Medical & Scientific Abstract Database LymeNet Newsletter Home Page LymeNet Recommended Books LymeNet Tick Pictures Search The LymeNet Site LymeNet Links LymeNet Frequently Asked Questions About The Lyme Disease Network LymeNet Menu

LymeNet on Facebook

LymeNet on Twitter




The Lyme Disease Network receives a commission from Amazon.com for each purchase originating from this site.

When purchasing from Amazon.com, please
click here first.

Thank you.

LymeNet Flash Discussion
Dedicated to the Bachmann Family

LymeNet needs your help:
LymeNet 2020 fund drive


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations.

LymeNet Flash Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» LymeNet Flash » Questions and Discussion » Medical Questions » Provoked heavy metal test accuracy ?

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Provoked heavy metal test accuracy ?
big lenny
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3048

Icon 1 posted      Profile for big lenny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I recently did a 6 hr provoked heavy metal test and it showed high levels of mercury and lead - of course when I did a web search on the topic I found and article claiming the lab I used to be fraudulent ! I'm not concerned about the money wasted on test ... I am hopeful that heavy metals may be part of my problems and once corrected I will finally feel better! But of course if test is misleading then once again I am lost !
Posts: 259 | From new york | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Summer3
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 35286

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Summer3   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I did the provoked test with DMSA through Dr's Data. Mine showed unusually low levels of everything. So not everyone tests high if that is your concern (it was a concern of mine too).

--------------------
http://www.lymepie.blogspot.com

Posts: 1129 | From USA | Registered: Dec 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
GretaM
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 40917

Icon 1 posted      Profile for GretaM     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Mine was a 6 hour thru doctors data also.

My doc was surprised, (pleasantly), as only 3 metals were above range "high".

(we were expecting worse given past chemical exposure and neuro issues).

The graph my LL showed me was for the 24 hour non provoked, I guess it extrapolates it? So heavy metals are not a concern for me as the ranges are for 24 hours non provoked.

Neff mentioned something about this also.
I think Neff's doc opted to do chelation anyways (?). (Correct me if I am remembering wrong, Neff!)

Basically, were your results being compared to 24 hour non provoked ranges?

If so, they can't really be compared. Like apples and oranges.

I have a feeling this doesn't help...just confuses the issue. Sorry [Frown]

Posts: 4358 | From British Columbia, Canada | Registered: Jun 2013  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Abxnomore
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 18936

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Abxnomore     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
What company did you use to test?

There are few people walking the earth that don't have elevated levels of heavy metals in there body. There is probably a very good chance that the test is accurate. Sites such as quack watch and other mainstream organizations take delight in bashing chelation and the accumulation of heavy metals in the body.

Chelating out heavy metals is a necessary part of Lyme recovery.

Posts: 5191 | From Lyme Zone | Registered: Jan 2009  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Catgirl
Frequent Contributor (5K+ posts)
Member # 31149

Icon 1 posted      Profile for Catgirl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
IMO, Doctors data IS accurate. The best lyme docs use it, so I am not concerned about any report that says otherwise. Look at how inaccurate the idsa is about lyme. I don't believe half the crap we're fed. IMO, heavy metals keep us down and must be addressed.

Also for others who see this, some people cannot excrete heavy metals very well (genetic reasons), so their tests turn out low, so there could still be a problem. There is info here if you do a search.

For anyone killing parasites, these bugs are often protected by biofilms, and we all know how tough it is to get anything through, much less out of them. The bugs release heavy metals when they die, so it is still a possible to have heavy metals even though the test indicates otherwise.

Gigi's posts have all the info on heavy metals and are worth the search.

--------------------
--Keep an open mind about everything. Also, remember to visit ACTIVISM (we can change things together).

Posts: 5418 | From earth | Registered: Mar 2011  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
big lenny
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3048

Icon 1 posted      Profile for big lenny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you all for the helpful insight ! Yes test was done by doctors data lab - I know by now I should not question what I know is wrong with me , but I can't help but to question when it has been takining me almost a decade to start on the hopefully road to recovery
Posts: 259 | From new york | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
big lenny
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3048

Icon 1 posted      Profile for big lenny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you all for the helpful insight ! Yes test was done by doctors data lab - I know by now I should not question what I know is wrong with me , but I can't help but to question when it has been takining me almost a decade to start on the hopefully road to recovery
Posts: 259 | From new york | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
big lenny
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3048

Icon 1 posted      Profile for big lenny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thank you all for the helpful insight ! Yes test was done by doctors data lab - I know by now I should not question what I know is wrong with me , but I can't help but to question when it has been takining me almost a decade to start on the hopefully road to recovery
Posts: 259 | From new york | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
big lenny
LymeNet Contributor
Member # 3048

Icon 1 posted      Profile for big lenny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Damn I phone !
Posts: 259 | From new york | Registered: Sep 2002  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code� is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  New Poll  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | LymeNet home page | Privacy Statement

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3


The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:

The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey
907 Pebble Creek Court, Pennington, NJ 08534 USA


| Flash Discussion | Support Groups | On-Line Library
Legal Resources | Medical Abstracts | Newsletter | Books
Pictures | Site Search | Links | Help/Questions
About LymeNet | Contact Us

© 1993-2020 The Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Use of the LymeNet Site is subject to Terms and Conditions.