posted
Wouldn't that be good for the economy for all those people to be on long term antibiotics? Or are the recommended antibiotics now generic, and not helpful to big pharma anymore?
Is the medical community worried about super bugs becoming more common if a lot of people go on long term antibiotic therapy?21`
It really seems like a conspiracy to me but I'd like to know the possible motivations.
Posts: 311 | From CA | Registered: Jul 2008
| IP: Logged |
bettyg
Unregistered
posted
JANICE,
go to my newbie package link below, and click on it.
read over my table of contents...
read tincups CAMP A VS. CAMP B,
village magazine article...33 pages from beginning of lyme up to present situation...
there may be others there, but those are the ones coming to my neuro mind right now. believe they are at the beginning of it all!!
IP: Logged |
adamm
Unregistered
posted
If I posted some of mine, I'd come off to a lot of people as
posted
A lot made sense to me after reading "Cure Unknown" by Pam Weintraub - she discusses it in a very sane way that makes sense.
Posts: 81 | From Iowa | Registered: May 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Cancer, auto-immune conditions
Posts: 13 | From U.S of A | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
charlie
Frequent Contributor (1K+ posts)
Member # 25
posted
....more profitable to push anti-depressants which are often used forever, than a year or so worth of usually cheap(except for mepron)anti-infectives.
the 'societal implications' of antibiotic overuse have nothing whatever to do with it...it's just a ploy to emotionalize the argument.
follow the money
my cynical .02
Charlie
Posts: 2804 | From Texas | Registered: Oct 2000
| IP: Logged |
The Lyme Disease Network is a non-profit organization funded by individual donations. If you would like to support the Network and the LymeNet system of Web services, please send your donations to:
The
Lyme Disease Network of New Jersey 907 Pebble Creek Court,
Pennington,
NJ08534USA http://www.lymenet.org/